Re: Packaging automation - separation of 'debian/' directory

2006-09-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's what I do for releases as well. For normal testing builds though > (that's to see if the package builds and works without planning a > release), creating a tarball and unpacking it first is too much work > IMO. So I wrote a script to do these thing

Re: Packaging automation - separation of 'debian/' directory

2006-09-06 Thread Panu Kalliokoski
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 02:03:28PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > So that leads to the question: What "best practices" are there for > creating the Debian sources ('foo_X.Y.orig.tar.gz', 'foo_X.Y-Z.dsc', > 'foo_X.Y-Z.diff.gz') automatically from a source working tree that > already contains the 'debian

Re: Packaging automation - separation of 'debian/' directory

2006-09-06 Thread Ben Finney
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 02:03:28PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > I've seen many recommendations that the 'debian/' directory should not > > be part of the 'foo_X.Y.orig.tar.gz' tarball but should always be > > added by the 'foo_X.Y-Z.diff.gz', even

Re: Packaging automation - separation of 'debian/' directory

2006-09-06 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 07 September 2006 08:14, Bas Wijnen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:48:42PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've seen many recommendations that the 'debian/' directory should not > > > be part of the 'foo_X.Y.orig.tar.gz' tarball but shoul

Re: Packaging automation - separation of 'debian/' directory

2006-09-06 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 02:03:28PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Howdy all, > > I've seen many recommendations that the 'debian/' directory should not > be part of the 'foo_X.Y.orig.tar.gz' tarball but should always be > added by the 'foo_X.Y-Z.diff.gz', even in the case of "I *am* the > upstream and

Re: Packaging automation - separation of 'debian/' directory

2006-09-06 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:48:42PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've seen many recommendations that the 'debian/' directory should not > > be part of the 'foo_X.Y.orig.tar.gz' tarball but should always be added > > by the 'foo_X.Y-Z.diff.gz', even in th

Re: Packaging automation - separation of 'debian/' directory

2006-09-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've seen many recommendations that the 'debian/' directory should not > be part of the 'foo_X.Y.orig.tar.gz' tarball but should always be added > by the 'foo_X.Y-Z.diff.gz', even in the case of "I *am* the upstream and > I prefer to track the 'debian/' dir

Packaging automation - separation of 'debian/' directory

2006-09-06 Thread Ben Finney
Howdy all, I've seen many recommendations that the 'debian/' directory should not be part of the 'foo_X.Y.orig.tar.gz' tarball but should always be added by the 'foo_X.Y-Z.diff.gz', even in the case of "I *am* the upstream and I prefer to track the 'debian/' directory as part of the source tree in

Re: RFS: qsa-x11-free

2006-09-06 Thread Rubén Darío Ponticelli
El Miércoles, 6 de Septiembre de 2006 18:03, Adam Cecile escribió: > Ok some stuff to fix : > > Clean debian/rules, remove unused lines, useless comments... > Clean debian/copyright (2 last lines). OK, I'll do that > Could you build examples ? I'll post my package, I did some work to get > them bu

RFS: personalbackup

2006-09-06 Thread Kim Kuylen
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "personalbackup". * Package name: personalbackup Version : 1.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Kim Kuylen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.personalbackup.org * License : GPL Section : utils It buil

Re: RFS: personalbackup

2006-09-06 Thread Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
> Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "personalbackup". IANADD, so I can't sponsor. But my comments, anyways: You should not depend in postgresql, since that is just a transitional package. Depend on an specific version, or on several. In a related note, should you depend

Re: RFS: qsa-x11-free

2006-09-06 Thread Le_Vert
Ok some stuff to fix : Clean debian/rules, remove unused lines, useless comments... Clean debian/copyright (2 last lines). Could you build examples ? I'll post my package, I did some work to get them built. Binaries are not built with -O2, I never managed to get CFLAGS working... On Wed, 6 Sep 2

Re: RFS: qsa-x11-free

2006-09-06 Thread Le_Vert
Nice! I tried to package it a few monthes ago but I haven't finished it... I'll have a look at the packaging right now :-) On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:32:14 -0300, Rubén Darío Ponticelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qsa-x11-free". > > *

RFS: qsa-x11-free

2006-09-06 Thread Rubén Darío Ponticelli
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qsa-x11-free". * Package name: qsa-x11-free Version : 1.1.4-1 Upstream Author : Trolltech AS. * URL : http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/addon/qsa * License : GPL Section : libs It builds the

RFS: xml-im-exporter

2006-09-06 Thread Marcus Better
Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xml-im-exporter". This is part of the JBoss packaging effort. * Package name: xml-im-exporter Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Oliver Zeigermann * URL or Web page : http://xml-im-exporter.sourceforge.net * License : custom B

RFS: cobalt-panel-utils (updated package)

2006-09-06 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.2-2 of my package "cobalt-panel-utils". It builds these binary packages: cobalt-panel-utils - System utilities for Sun Cobalt's LCD and LEDs This new version fix a lots of build warnings and add uscan support through debian/watch.

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-09-06 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:24:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > > do you have a documentation explaining how to set up a patch-system like > dpatch Dear Frédéric, I wrote the following paragraphs in a never released web page:

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-09-06 Thread picca
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 23:32:21 +0200 "Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Frédéric, > I'm not a DD (so I can't upload, and for sure I'll miss some notes), > but I gave a look at your package and found some issues: > > * lintian errors: > E: lisaac-doc: copyright-should-refer-to-common-licen