Re: RFS: tellico

2006-09-10 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:16:41PM +0100, Régis Boudin wrote: >I am looking for someone who could sponsor the new release of tellico, >and possibly do it on a regular basis until I become a DD (maybe, some >day...). I could help with that. >- dget >http://www.imalip.info/tellico/pool/main/t/telli

RFS: tellico

2006-09-10 Thread Régis Boudin
Hi debian-mentors, I am looking for someone who could sponsor the new release of tellico, and possibly do it on a regular basis until I become a DD (maybe, some day...). The package is lintian and linda clean, and AFAIK, around 200 people downloaded it from my repository without an issue reported

Re: Relibtoolize

2006-09-10 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006, Michael Biebl wrote: > You could use "autoreconf -vfi" in the future. It should do the right > thing automatically. It doesn't use the same version as upstream does, and hence creates big diffs. Besides, it calls all auto* tools, not just the one needed for relibtoolizing

Re: RFS: anymeal

2006-09-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
So it seems that the photos are GFDLed: how can I check if they are acceptable in Debian? I've checked, and even in the application is stated that photos are under GFDL licence and are taken from [1], in the page [2] I can read: "Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this docu

Re: Relibtoolize

2006-09-10 Thread Michael Biebl
You could use "autoreconf -vfi" in the future. It should do the right thing automatically. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: jlha-utils -- command-line lzh archiver written in Java

2006-09-10 Thread Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
James Westby wrote: >> > > This is reasonable. > > You can file a wishlist bug against the lha package asking them to use > alternatives. You can discuss with them about priorities. > > I'm not sure that you need a bug against policy. > > James Thanks. And there's a procedure in /usr/share/d

Re: Relibtoolize

2006-09-10 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Sun, Sep 10, 2006, Julien Valroff wrote: > That was it! I had tried looking for the package containing the macros > but couldn't find a good way to do it... and hadn't thought it could > simply be intltool :-( Ok, in this case, it might not be an upstream bug as you're expected to

Re: Relibtoolize

2006-09-10 Thread Julien Valroff
Le dimanche 10 septembre 2006 à 11:11 +0200, Loïc Minier a écrit : > Hi, > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006, Julien Valroff wrote: > > ... > > /tmp/buildd/fast-user-switch-applet-2.16.0/./configure: line 2488: syntax > > error near unexpected token `0.35.0' > > /tmp/buildd/fast-user-switch-applet-2

Re: RFS: jlha-utils -- command-line lzh archiver written in Java

2006-09-10 Thread James Westby
[Moving back on list as more people will be able to help] On (10/09/06 10:57), Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > James Westby wrote: > > * Please add a full stop to the Initial release line of you > > debian/changelog. > > Sorry, what is a full stop? This one doesn't matter. The next packag

Re: Relibtoolize

2006-09-10 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Sun, Sep 10, 2006, Julien Valroff wrote: > ... > /tmp/buildd/fast-user-switch-applet-2.16.0/./configure: line 2488: syntax > error near unexpected token `0.35.0' > /tmp/buildd/fast-user-switch-applet-2.16.0/./configure: line 2488: > `IT_PROG_INTLTOOL(0.35.0)' > ... When updating

Relibtoolize

2006-09-10 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi, I am trying to update the fast-user-switch-applet package[1] to the latest release for GNOME 2.16. My sponsor asked me to relibtoolize the package, and until now, I got no problems using these[2] links[3] as guidelines. With the 2.16.0 release, however, I have some errors when running config