Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, Updated packages at: http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/dvipng/dvipng_1.8-0.4.diff.gz http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/dvipng/dvipng_1.8-0.4.dsc http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/dvipng/dvipng_1.8.orig.tar.gz and http://mentors.debian.net/debian/p

Re: Can a package using a cow-shell be cow-builded?

2006-09-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > I am preparing the package of a software which provides regression tests > in a separate directory, for which there is no "make clean" available. > For the moment, I copy the directory somewhere else, perform the tests > in (it generates many files), and delete the directory in debian/rules

RFS: anymeal (take two)

2006-09-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "anymeal". This is the second RFS about this package: the first sponsorship got rejected by ftpmaster due to missing license note about images (this pkg should solve this issue). * Package name: anymeal Version : 0.29-3-2 Upstr

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 05:16:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote: > On (16/09/06 21:34), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote: > > > * The debian/copyright file is lacking. There is no copyright > > > information, what is referred to as Copyright is in fact a Li

Re: RFS: frown

2006-09-16 Thread James Westby
On (16/09/06 09:12), Arjan Oosting wrote: > Op za, 16-09-2006 te 00:13 +0100, schreef James Westby: > > * debian/dirs is redundant here. > Huh? Why is it redundant? The upstream Makefile does not create > $(bindir) so I debian/dirs to make sure usr/bin exists. > Sorry. debian/dirs is not redund

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > >> On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: >> >> >>> Christoph Haas wrote: >>> >>> On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > I am look

Re: RFS: haskell-uulib

2006-09-16 Thread Arjan Oosting
Hi James, Op za, 16-09-2006 te 00:35 +0100, schreef James Westby: > Hi, > > Again I cannot sponsor, but I have some comments on the package. > > * Also there is some boilerplate in files under debian/ that could be > removed (debian/rules and debian/watch specifically). Fixed in svn, wil

Re: RFS: frown

2006-09-16 Thread Arjan Oosting
Op za, 16-09-2006 te 00:13 +0100, schreef James Westby: > On (15/09/06 23:21), Arjan Oosting wrote: > > Hi potential sponsors, > > > > As I am still in the NM queue I am searching for a sponsor for "frown". > > > > * Package name: from > > Hi, package looks pretty cool. Thanks for packaging

License DData (was Re: RFS: haskell-uulib)

2006-09-16 Thread Arjan Oosting
[ cc-ed Daan Leijen as he is the author of the DData library and Alexey Rodriguez as he is the upstream maintainer of uulib ] Hi Daan and Alexey, I am trying to get the uulib Haskell library (formarly known as uust) of the Utrecht University into the Debian archive. As you probably know this l

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread James Westby
On (16/09/06 21:34), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote: > > * The debian/copyright file is lacking. There is no copyright > > information, what is referred to as Copyright is in fact a License, > > and not a copy of a license header from the package. >

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote: > On (16/09/06 15:40), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > Hi, package looks good. I just have a couple of points. > > * Why 1.8-0.3? Why not -0.1? I already uploaded 1.8-0.[12] earlier to various public places for people to check earlier so I wanted t

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Christoph Haas wrote: > On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > >> Christoph Haas wrote: >> >>> On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: >>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+". >>> I don't know w

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Christoph Haas
On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+". > > > > I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from > > http

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread James Westby
On (16/09/06 15:40), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > Hello, > > Updated packages at: > > http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/dvipng/dvipng_1.8-0.3.diff.gz > http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/dvipng/dvipng_1.8-0.3.dsc > http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/dvipng/dvipng_1.8.ori

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Christoph Haas wrote: > On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+". >> > > I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from > http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/museek-plus/museek+-0.1

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Christoph Haas
On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+". I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/museek-plus/museek+-0.1.11.tar.bz2 differs in several places from

RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+". This is the third post of this RFS, please consider checking and sponsoring museek+. It's really a great software. Thanks in advance. * Package name : museek+ Version : 0.1.11-1 Upstream Author : "Hyriand

Re: RFS: isomd5sum (formerly anaconda) [uploaded]

2006-09-16 Thread Christoph Haas
On Friday 15 September 2006 18:11, James Westby wrote: > On (14/09/06 15:15), Ryan Finnie wrote: > > isomd5sum_11.1.0.95-1 has been updated in-place. Removed .cvsignore, > > added md5.c information to debian/copyright, removed unnecessary > > current maintainer line from debian/copyright. James,

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, George Danchev wrote: > Just a comment: your debian/rules clean target calls top-level Makefile's > distclean target which depends on dvipng.1 target which calls unknown program > of texi2pod.pl (probably a hack for local usage by the upstream authors, > which is not

Re: binNMU safe and ${binary:Version} or ${source:Version}

2006-09-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 09:47:34AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > The BIG problem is how to get the next-version. Say you have version > > > 1.2-3. A binNMU would be 1.2-3+b1, a security release would be > > > 1.2-3etch1 (unless there wa

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 16 September 2006 09:58, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, George Danchev wrote: > > > Just to let you know that these are 'Not Found'. Why don't you upload > > > to mentors.debian.net instead ? > > > > Regarding ment