On Tuesday 19 September 2006 11:38, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> The current version in unstable may creates files in /etc/. I filled an
> RC bug to avoid migration in testing.
>
> The new package is available, could you upload it Christoph ?
Alright, done.
Christoph
--
~
~
".signature" [Modi
On (20/09/06 01:02), Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "filezilla3".
>
> * Package name: filezilla3
Hi Adam,
I'm sure you know the drill by now, I cannot sponsor etc.
On to the comments.
* multi-platforms should be multi-platform
Le mercredi 20 septembre 2006 01:02, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "filezilla3".
>
> * Package name: filezilla3
> Version : 2.9.4+cvs20060919-1
> Upstream Author : Tim Kosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Project Leader)
> * URL
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "filezilla3".
* Package name: filezilla3
Version : 2.9.4+cvs20060919-1
Upstream Author : Tim Kosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Project Leader)
* URL : http://filezilla-project.org/
* License : GPL
Section
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:48:08AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> This is up to you; I've done it both ways in the past. If the bug is
> affects the usability of the package, and it could take a while to fix it,
> go ahead and report the bug to the BTS. That will let other users know that
> the mai
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:19:04PM +, Rodrigo Tavares wrote:
>> My debian/control
>> Package: script
>> Priority: low
>> Version: 1.0
>> Architecture: i386
>> Maintainer: xxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Depends : {shlibs:Depends} ${misc:Depends} debcon
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 00:40, Neil Williams wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote:
>
> Turns out that (answering my own question):
>
> > Does every package in the virtual man-browser package need to provide
> > the 'man' command or can some require a different command (without a
> > symlink)?
>
> No
Neil Williams wrote:
Turns out that (answering my own question):
> Does every package in the virtual man-browser package need to provide
> the 'man' command or can some require a different command (without a
> symlink)?
No - several packages in man-browser don't even accept a file on the
command
Neil Williams wrote:
(and several others also)
Ho-hum, the easy answers always get replies just as I hit Send!
:-(
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signat
Henrique Haas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to adopt rpl, a newcomer package in WNPP. Must I be a DD the
> adopt this package? Or I pack it and look for a sponsor?
Retitle #388131 from O: to ITA: using the 'bts' program or direct email.
Package rlp and call dch --closes 388131. Then look for a sponsor.
On (19/09/06 17:26), Henrique Haas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to adopt rpl, a newcomer package in WNPP. Must I be a DD the adopt
> this package? Or I pack it and look for a sponsor?
>
No, you do not need to be a DD. If you are not you would need to find a
sponsor to upload the package for you.
Ho
On (19/09/06 19:36), Frank S. Thomas wrote:
> retitle 338949 ITA: euler -- an interactive mathematical program
> owner 338949 !
> thanks
>
> Hi!
>
> I intend to adopt euler and since I'm not a DD I'm also looking for a sponsor
> for my updated package which is available at:
> http://frank.thoma
Hi Henrique!
On 9/19/06, Henrique Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to adopt rpl, a newcomer package in WNPP. Must I be a DD the adopt this
package? Or I pack it and look for a sponsor?
You don't need to be a DD! Everybody can create a package for Debian.
But it looks that someone alrea
Hi,
I want to adopt rpl, a newcomer package in WNPP. Must I be a DD the adopt this
package? Or I pack it and look for a sponsor?
Thank you!
--
Henrique Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG: 0x5CC596AF at pgp.mit.edu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Hello,
I add the fisrt line the field :
Source : missing
But the error continue the same.
Thanks
Faria
--- Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> This is really a question for -mentors, rather than
> -devel. Cc set,
> please send follow-ups (if any) only there.
>
> On Tue, Sep 19
Does every package in the virtual man-browser package need to provide
the 'man' command or can some require a different command (without a
symlink)?
i.e. if I spawn a process with the command line:
man path/to/file
will it always work?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
This is really a question for -mentors, rather than -devel. Cc set,
please send follow-ups (if any) only there.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:19:04PM +, Rodrigo Tavares wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I run the command below, come this error message:
>
>
> mypc:~/script-1.4# dh_gencontrol
> dh_gencon
retitle 338949 ITA: euler -- an interactive mathematical program
owner 338949 !
thanks
Hi!
I intend to adopt euler and since I'm not a DD I'm also looking for a sponsor
for my updated package which is available at:
http://frank.thomas-alfeld.de/download/debian/euler/
http://frank.thomas-alfeld.
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:46:35 +0100
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your suggestions.
>
> * Please use ${binary:Version} and ${source:Version} in preference to
> ${Source-Version} in debian/control.
> * I would like some more "meat" in the descriptions.
> * Lose
On (19/09/06 19:30), Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 19/09/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A Debian native package is a program written specifically to Debian,
>
> A package is not a program. s/to/for/ =>
>
> "A Debian native package is a package of a program written
> specifically f
[A question at the end for all list members...]
On (19/09/06 17:33), Philipp Benner wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cunit".
>
> * Package name: cunit
Hi,
I can't sponsor the package, but I have a few comments.
* Please use ${binary:Version} and ${so
On 19/09/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting your site:
>
> "A Debian native package is a package that is specific to Debian, and
> would not be of interest to say Fedora. Godd examples are dpkg and apt
> tools."
>
> Actually, apt and dpkg are used by at least one project outsid
On (19/09/06 22:56), Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 01:01:15PM +0100, James Westby a écrit :
> >
> > See http://jameswestby.net/mentors/glossary/native.html
>
> Hi James,
>
> Quoting your site:
>
> "A Debian native package is a package that is specific to Debian, and
> would no
[-devel and Wouter Verhelst excluded.]
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 16:30, Rodrigo Tavares wrote:
> > Tavares wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > When I run the command below, come this error
> >
> > message:
> > > mypc:~/script-1.4# dh_gencontrol
Avoid working as root for no good reasons. Work as m
Dear mentors,
I am packaging a program which depends on xterm because it opens a
window to start a command line program. I am considering patching it to
use x-terminal-emulator.
But alternatives have a bad tendency to represent the latest program
installed in the category, instead of the most wan
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cunit".
* Package name: cunit
Version : 2.1-0-1
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://cunit.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
Section : libs
It builds these binary packages:
libcuni
Le Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 01:01:15PM +0100, James Westby a écrit :
>
> See http://jameswestby.net/mentors/glossary/native.html
Hi James,
Quoting your site:
"A Debian native package is a package that is specific to Debian, and
would not be of interest to say Fedora. Godd examples are dpkg and apt
Hi,
On Tue, 19.09.2006 at 00:16:37 +0200, Frits Daalmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 17 September 2006 23:01, Toni Mueller wrote:
> did you try RCS?
>
> man 1 ident
thanks - I think this is what I was after.
To Matthew: I hoped to avoid using strings + something - that was what
I wa
On (19/09/06 12:27), Neil Williams wrote:
> Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 September 2006 03:44, James Westby wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, I can't sponsor as I am not a DD, but I have some comments,
> >>
> >> * I don't think the package should be Debian native.
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understan
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 13:27, Neil Williams wrote:
> AFAICT, the ITP claims 0.6-1 (which is not a Debian native package
> version) but your link to the "package" (the .tar.bz2 a tarball of built
> packages) uses version number 0.6 (which WOULD indicate a Debian native
> package.)
>
> http://
Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 03:44, James Westby wrote:
>
>> Hi, I can't sponsor as I am not a DD, but I have some comments,
>>
>> * I don't think the package should be Debian native.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Could you please explain what you
> mean
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 03:44, James Westby wrote:
> Hi, I can't sponsor as I am not a DD, but I have some comments,
>
> * I don't think the package should be Debian native.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Could you please explain what you
mean?
> * The debian/copyright file n
Le dimanche 3 septembre 2006 08:01, Christoph Haas a écrit :
> On Sunday 03 September 2006 01:29, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> > Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > Your package is already uploaded.
> >
> > I didn't get any email from debian ftp-master and this package doesn't
> > appear on my QA page. A
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:46:22 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> This is of course true, but leads to the following question: is the
> Adobe PDF format more open than MS doc format, and why ?
Adobe has published the specs for the PDF format, and it is well
supported by many f
34 matches
Mail list logo
