Hi all,
My question is in the last paragraph of this email.
Progress note:
I am working on a port of gnome-app-install to Debian. This utility,
made by the folks at Canonical Inc. and Ubuntu, is like Synaptic, but
ten times easier to use.
It currently does the job but does not always quit after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:57:58 +0100, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On (25/09/06 19:01), holoturoide wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.6-3
>> of my package "gtksee".
>>
>
> Hi, I cannot sponso
Le Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:20:43AM +0200, Arjan Oosting a écrit :
>
> And also see a mail on devel-announce:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/07/msg8.html
>
Thank you, this is what I was looking for.
So If I understand correctly, although one could maybe consider that
Op do, 28-09-2006 te 10:06 +0900, schreef Charles Plessy:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> As I am preparing the upload a package which fixes a versioning mistake
> (1.x uploaded as 2.0), I was wondering if it would make sense to set an
> urgency higher than "low" so that the package migrates faster to
> testi
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:33:46AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:20:15PM -0300, Leo Antunes a écrit :
> > If that's done then you're job's simple, repackage with the new version
> > and that's it. Make it as fast as possible though, since your users are
> > probably a bi
Dear Mentors,
As I am preparing the upload a package which fixes a versioning mistake
(1.x uploaded as 2.0), I was wondering if it would make sense to set an
urgency higher than "low" so that the package migrates faster to
testing.
The package is very simple (one binary), and provides a functiona
Le Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:20:15PM -0300, Leo Antunes a écrit :
> If that's done then you're job's simple, repackage with the new version
> and that's it. Make it as fast as possible though, since your users are
> probably a bit confused by now... and if upstream takes a while to
> release official
Hi,
I hereby renew my request for sponsorship.
I have update the package after some remarks of James Westby and
Stephane Bortzmeyer and hope that someone is willing to upload it,
* Package name: frown
Version : 0.6.1-3
Upstream Author : Ralf Hinze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL
Daniel Baumann wrote:
>
> I think he will offer you co-maintainership, and if so, I'll sponsor the
> upload if you want.
He already offered me (although not documented on a public ML/buglog),
and he's aware that I've been working with Sergey Golovin for the new
Pantomime stuff.
Gürkan, could you
Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-1
> of the package "lusernet.app".
This package is maintained by Gurkan, and since he didn't orphan the
package, it would normally not be considered for an upload unless
there's an RC bug or as long as he is not MIA.
I'm
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 06:26 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> What's upstream doing about it now? Are they releasing a 2.0.1 or 2.1 or 3
> or something to replace that one, or are they just sticking with the V2
> package? Again, what are upstream's plans? That will have a massive
> bearing on what
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-1
of the package "lusernet.app".
It builds these binary packages:
lusernet.app - News Reader for GNUstep
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 350435, 356531
It would also help the completion of the ongo
Please consider joining [EMAIL PROTECTED]
where most pkg-voip related packages are maintained on a team basis.
The DDs on that list will happily sponsor the uploads for your package.
Regards.
El mié, 27-09-2006 a las 21:47 +0200, Lionel Porcheron escribió:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gastman".
* Package name: gastman
Version : 1.0~rc1-1
Upstream Author : Mark Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ftp.digium.com/pub/gastman/
* License : GPLv2
Section : comm
It builds th
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:41:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > > > If copyright has been asserted on the file t
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php-xdebug".
* Package name: php-xdebug
Version : 1.99+2.0.0beta6-1
Upstream Author : Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.xdebug.org
* License : The Xdebug License, version 1.01 (Based on
Sponsored.
Cheers,
tony
Willi Mann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm searching for a temporary sponsor for logwatch 7.3.1-2. It's
> available from
>
> http://pkg-logwatch.alioth.debian.org/apt/pool/main/l/logwatch/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi!
I'm searching for a temporary sponsor for logwatch 7.3.1-2. It's
available from
http://pkg-logwatch.alioth.debian.org/apt/pool/main/l/logwatch/
I want to get 7.3.1 into etch, because the current 7.3-2 doesn't
properly support postfix 2.3 any more and reports some other lines
concerning logs
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:10:34AM +0100, Jon Dowland a écrit :
> > At 1158313616 past the epoch, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > EMBOSS is shipped and built with its own copy of libpcre.
> > > As a result, the EMBOSS Debian package contains some fil
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:34:11 +0200
Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.50-1 of my package
> "libapp-info-perl".
Sponsored, thanks to Ricardo Mones.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Le Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:10:34AM +0100, Jon Dowland a écrit :
> At 1158313616 past the epoch, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > EMBOSS is shipped and built with its own copy of libpcre.
> > As a result, the EMBOSS Debian package contains some files
> > wich are also in the libpcre Debian package, and the
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Right. But soikko/voikko are sufficiently similar (and soikko is unmaintained
upstream afaik
and non-free) so that it doesn't really make sense to install both soikko and
voikko?
[ and soikko could be removed if voikko is in the archive if no one obje
At 1158313616 past the epoch, Charles Plessy wrote:
> EMBOSS is shipped and built with its own copy of libpcre.
> As a result, the EMBOSS Debian package contains some files
> wich are also in the libpcre Debian package, and they
> conflict together.
Argh. Reading the -devel mesg you linked to, I t
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2006 08:22 schrieben Sie:
> I did the change to 1.1-2 yesterday evening. I soon got a few notices that
> multiple spellcheckers work in OOo just fine. What do you think? Of course
Right.
> it's not maybe that wise to use more than one spellchecker for a language,
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:41:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > > If copyright has been asserted on the file then it must be mentioned in
> > > debian/rules, along with its distributio
25 matches
Mail list logo
