Re: RFS: harminv

2006-11-12 Thread Székelyi Szabolcs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Loic Le Guyader wrote: > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz nul-unu.com> writes: >> I: harminv: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/harminv.1.gz:180 > > I don't have that problem ! My lintian don't report anything like that ! Run lintian with -I :

Re: RFC: ipw3945

2006-11-12 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006, Daniel Baumann wrote: > I don't want to have ipw* build with kernel-headers, but with iee80211 > extra package. Argh! > There are basically two reasons for this: > 0. Currently the ieee80211 headers in mainline are recent enough to > allow ipw* compiled against it. T

Re: RFC: ipw3945

2006-11-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
Andreas Barth wrote: > Eh, that doesn't sound really useful. One never knows for sure what the > future brings. We are speaking only about the time where ipw3945 is not in mainline. I don't see any practical gain in using mainline headers now, dealing with problems there, and reverting to the extr

Re: RFC: ipw3945

2006-11-12 Thread Kel Modderman
On Sunday 12 November 2006 20:46, Daniel Baumann wrote: > I don't want to have ipw* build with kernel-headers, but with iee80211 > extra package. > > There are basically two reasons for this: > > 0. Currently the ieee80211 headers in mainline are recent enough to > allow ipw* compiled agains

Re: RFC: ipw3945

2006-11-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* Daniel Baumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061112 11:46]: > 0. Currently the ieee80211 headers in mainline are recent enough to > allow ipw* compiled against it. This may change again in > future, hence I compile them all the time against ieee80211. Eh, that doesn't sound really useful. One

Re: RFC: ipw3945

2006-11-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
Loïc Minier wrote: > To add my $0.02 to the table, I'm willing to sponsor Kel's packages, > and even uploading them right now if Daniel sees no objection. I have > ipw3945 hardware myself, am running the packages prepared by Kel (which > have a very useful patch to build against vanilla linux-

Re: Help with updating nco package?

2006-11-12 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 13:26 -0800, Charlie Zender wrote: > Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > nco is currently maintained by Debian QA Group. Are you willing to take > > over? If so, you should tell them. > > Yes, I would like to take over nco maintainance, if it's OK with them. > I'm not a debian developer

Re: RFS: harminv

2006-11-12 Thread Loic Le Guyader
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz nul-unu.com> writes: > You need to move the libharmin.so symlink to the -dev package, as it > is only used when developing with the library and not at runtime. done. > Those files belong in the -dev package, too. And, unless you know > there's specific reason, you sho

Re: RFC: ipw3945

2006-11-12 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, To add my $0.02 to the table, I'm willing to sponsor Kel's packages, and even uploading them right now if Daniel sees no objection. I have ipw3945 hardware myself, am running the packages prepared by Kel (which have a very useful patch to build against vanilla linux-headers), and

RFS: libctl (updated package)

2006-11-12 Thread Lo�c Le Guyader
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0.2-1 of my package "libctl". It builds these binary packages: libctl-dev - Library for flexible control files, development version libctl-doc - libctl documentation in HTML format libctl3- Library for flexible control files The