DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
SEND RESUMES TO jobs@
Thank you for your interest in a position
advertised by .
We are unable to process your application because
you did not include the Job ID# in the subject
line of your email.
Please apply online at http://www./
or follow these instructions for
I'll see how does similar packages deals with it but I really vote for
the lintian override.
I was wrong. This issue was discussed at #368792 :
[...]the general consensus [...] is that such scripts should either be
marked
executable or have that line removed if they really can't be
Hi,
Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The requirement for #! / was documented in 4.1BSD but the
implementation never really required it - compare
http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shebang/exec.2.html and
http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shebang/sys1.c.html
(Found via
Hi !
I build my first debian package and want to add it in debian
(unstable, of course).
Can help my anybody ?
Project:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/silentbob
(lyrics, all other docs in package).
In short - ctags/cscope/ctree etc. alternative.
Oleg.
Sorry for everything, I am first year
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 15:38, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Luca Bedogni wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libinstrudeo/
* you did modify Makefile.in and configure, this is not noted in the
changelog. was it done on purpose?
Nope, i restored them
* README.Debian is
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 20:27 +0600, Oleg Puchinin wrote:
Hi !
I build my first debian package and want to add it in debian
(unstable, of course).
Can help my anybody ?
Project:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/silentbob
(lyrics, all other docs in package).
In short - ctags/cscope/ctree etc.
Marcus,
Thanks for your comments, which I have applied to my packaging.
Regarding your comment:
I don't think the repackaging of the upstream zip file into a tarball
warrants a README.Debian-source file, so I would remove that.
I put this in because of section 6.7.8.2 in the Developers'
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:46:37PM +0100, Andreas Bresser wrote:
Hi,
so is it enought when I update my package manually using uupdate and
create a watch file that looks like you suggested?
(because that line does not work):
Well, until uscan gets fixed, or an upload to sf.net is made, it
Luca Bedogni wrote:
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 15:38, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Luca Bedogni wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libinstrudeo/
* you did modify Makefile.in and configure, this is not noted in the
changelog. was it done on purpose?
Nope, i restored them
Kees Cook wrote:
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
just two things:
* debian/control has a useless empty line at the end.
* mpg321|mpg123 should be mpg312 | mpg123
if you adjust it, i'll sponsor it.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562
Luca Bedogni wrote:
Restored to the original ones :)
good.
according to debian/control, you have a libstrudeo0 package.
in debian directory, there is libstrudeo1.install and
libstrudeo.install. please fix it.
Fixed now
libinstrudeo.install is still there.
remove the useless, commented
well, and remove also debian/postinst.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Kees Cook wrote:
Ah-ha! Thanks for the catches. I've adjusted the control file and
re-uploaded it to mentors.d.n.
well done, just uploaded.
if you want/need further sponsoring, write me off-list:
http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/sponsoring.html#contact
--
Address:Daniel
Loic Le Guyader wrote:
I tried to build the package in a sid chroot and everything went find. And the
configure script found the libhdf5 and the libgsl.
tried again, doesn't build for the same reason.
to make sure we have the same system, can you try up2date sid and use
the missing
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, just for being a bit nitpicker, it's not really lintian clean:
N: Processing binary package fvwm-icons (version 2001.08.13-5) ...
I: fvwm-icons: possible-non-posix-code-in-maintainer-script
I'm looking for sponsor. I'd like to keep this in Debian for the Old
PCs. Program requires very little memory.
Package name: dlume
Version : 0.2.4-4
ITA/ITP URL : http://bugs.debian.org/391423
* Package bugs URL: http://bugs.debian.org/dlume
Mentors URL :
James Westby wrote:
On (22/11/06 15:31), Paul Cager wrote:
I don't think the repackaging of the upstream zip file into a tarball
warrants a README.Debian-source file, so I would remove that.
I put this in because of section 6.7.8.2 in the Developers' Reference
seemed to require it. Is this
Jari Aalto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh no. Please leep it since it will make script more portable.
Hm. I suppose I can leave in the warning for portability to System V, but
the systems with the old precendence problem with -a and -o are getting
rarer and rarer now. This is quickly becoming
On 23 Nov 2006 00:55:46 +0200
Jari Aalto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for sponsor. I'd like to keep this in Debian for the Old
PCs. Program requires very little memory.
I'm willing to take a look at it tomorrow and If it checks out, I'll
gladly sponsor. A bit late to look at it
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 12:43:33PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 11:21:45AM +0100, Andreas Bresser wrote:
Hello,
The upstream-author of my package spe uploaded a new release on
berlios.de (on sourceforge is still the old version), so I changed the
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:27:58PM +0600, Oleg Puchinin wrote:
Hi !
I build my first debian package and want to add it in debian
(unstable, of course).
Can help my anybody ?
Project:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/silentbob
(lyrics, all other docs in package).
In short -
21 matches
Mail list logo
