Hi Daniel,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
but now, you've added additional stuff which you have successfully
removed previously:
* useless commented docbook-to-man call in rules
Okay!! Fixed.
* not required dh_* calls
I don't know which dh_ call you're pointing to. I've not changed any of those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you are able to help me with some problems I am having packaging an
application with some shared objects (.so libraries), I would be very
grateful. I know very little about SOs, and even after a bit of research
on the web I'm still not sure of the
Hi Paul,
you should definitely read
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
It should answer most of your questions, including package layout and
the role of -dev packages.
Regarding the install location: does your package use autoconf?
You then probably simply
During a recent upgrade of my Debian Sid box, I noticed the
following changelog entry:
f-spot (0.2.2-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
* Update to 0.2.2 upstream
Perhaps I've already missed a discussion on this. If so, I'd
appreciate a link/pointer so that I can read up. But if not, then
are
Hi Warren,
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 10:55, Warren Turkal wrote:
I think that we should just go for it. W00T!
OK, you've convinced me that compiling with gfortran shouldn't be a
problem. (But please try to make sure that maintainers of any new
packages introduced
On 12/14/06, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the Lintian issua an information message of any kinf for the
Homepage: field? If it would, the maintainers could possibly pay more
attention. Not many are aware of the spcae or two space reason for
long URLs.
No. There's a proposed
Kevin Coyner wrote:
During a recent upgrade of my Debian Sid box, I noticed the
following changelog entry:
f-spot (0.2.2-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
* Update to 0.2.2 upstream
Perhaps I've already missed a discussion on this. If so, I'd
appreciate a link/pointer so that I can
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:13:19 -0500
Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During a recent upgrade of my Debian Sid box, I noticed the
following changelog entry:
f-spot (0.2.2-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
* Update to 0.2.2 upstream
Perhaps I've already missed a discussion on this. If
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In some ways, the Ubuntu changes become a bit like an NMU and you need
to acknowledge any changes that you integrate into the Debian package.
Yes, I saw a 'Patch from ubuntu' against my package 'flexbackup' (it
didn't come in as a bug, but it's on the
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:17:26 -0500
Kurt B. Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In some ways, the Ubuntu changes become a bit like an NMU and you need
to acknowledge any changes that you integrate into the Debian package.
Yes, I saw a 'Patch from ubuntu' against my package 'flexbackup' (it
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:13:19AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
During a recent upgrade of my Debian Sid box, I noticed the
following changelog entry:
f-spot (0.2.2-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
* Update to 0.2.2 upstream
Perhaps I've already missed a discussion on this. If so,
I wanted to reply to the two parts of your mail separately, so please check
out this one and the next one.
On Thursday 14 December 2006 11:09, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
think it must have at least been built with the new g++:
benjo (sid)[2]:~% apt-cache show libnetcdf++3| grep Depends
On Thursday 14 December 2006 11:09, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
1) Why did you make the libnetcdf++3 package into a dummy package and
move the C++ bindings into the libnetcdf3 package? If the soname of the
C++ package needs to evolve faster than that of the C/FORTRAN bindings,
as I speculated
13 matches
Mail list logo
