RFS: cwiid -- Linux interface to the Wiimote

Hi mentors ! I'm looking for a sponsor for this package: * Package name    : cwiid   Version         : 0.3.51   Upstream Author : L. Donnie Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL             : http://www.wiili.org/index.php/CWiid * License         : GPL

RFS: network-manager-openvpn

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package network-manager-openvpn. * Package name: network-manager-openvpn Version : 0.6.4svn2242-1 Upstream Author : RedHat Inc. * URL : http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/NetworkManager/trunk/vpn-daemons/openvpn * License

RFS: network-manager-vpnc

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package network-manager-vpnc. * Package name: network-manager-vpnc Version : 0.6.4svn2242-1 Upstream Author : RedHat Inc. * URL : http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/NetworkManager/trunk/vpn-daemons/vpnc * License :

Re: RFS: gexec

On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:52:03PM +0100, Johann Rudloff wrote: Hi, Chris Bannister wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package gexec. Hi, is this still the case? I didn't write that. -- Chris. == ... the official version cannot be abandoned because the implication

Re: RFS: network-manager-openvpn

On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 03:30:56PM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote.. I am looking for a sponsor for my package network-manager-openvpn. * Package name: network-manager-openvpn Version : 0.6.4svn2242-1 Upstream Author : RedHat Inc. * URL :

Re: RFS: network-manager-openvpn

Soren Hansen wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package network-manager-openvpn. * Package name: network-manager-openvpn Version : 0.6.4svn2242-1 Upstream Author : RedHat Inc. * URL :

Removing self-managed conffiles?

Hi, I have a package with a bunch of configuration files that are managed by my maintainer scripts and not by dpkg. I now need one of them (a.conf) to vanish. How do I do this in a clean way? I am thinking about the following: (1) Let the new package version know about the md5sum of the last

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Marc Haber wrote: Hi, I have a package with a bunch of configuration files that are managed by my maintainer scripts and not by dpkg. I now need one of them (a.conf) to vanish. How do I do this in a clean way? I am thinking about the following: (1) Let the new

Re: Removing self-managed configuration files?

Hi, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a package with a bunch of configuration files that are managed by my maintainer scripts and not by dpkg. Therefore, these configuration files are *not* conffiles. Your Subject line was misleading (especially considering we are on -mentors). (1)

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Instead of 1,2,3 you could do 1,2,3 only when upgrading from a version previous than the one not having a.conf anymore Sure. and in case that (3) happens, keep a.conf untouched, instead of renaming it (assuming the program will not read a.conf

RFS: whitedune : Graphical VRML97 viewer, editor, 3D modeller and animation tool

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package whitedune. * Package name: whitedune Version : 0.28pl11-1 Upstream Author : Stephen F. White (and others) swhite(a)Discreet.COM * URL : http://www.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de/vrml/dune/ * License : GPL v2

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 09:34:28AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: Hi, I have a package with a bunch of configuration files that are managed by my maintainer scripts and not by dpkg. I now need one of them (a.conf) to vanish. How do I do this in a clean way? I am thinking about the following:

What to do if my package doesn't build on some architecture

Dear Mentors, I have come across an unexpected (serious), bug in my package libitpp, that it doesn't build on s390. Check http://bugs.debian.org/407555 Now, I would like to know how to bail the package out of this situation. Do I try to fix the problem, referring it to upstream, or is it that I