Klinky Blond Ldong Lkegged TRANSOEXUAL Sbhows Haairy Dmick

2007-01-20 Thread Willie Schultz
There lives more faith in honest doubt, Believe me, than in half the creeds. Cplassy Suexy TRMANSEXUAL Smhowing Her Btooty In Bvedroom http://only.lakapaj.com/ Know-how will surpass guess-how.Genius is an infinite capacity for taking pains.Falling out of love is chiefly a matter of forgetting h

Re: RFS: sshproxy

2007-01-20 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du samedi 20 janvier 2007, vers 22:47, Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> But I get the point and fixed this problem by not using dh_installinit >> and invoking rc.d "by hand". > Strange. dh_installinit works for me every time. I don't use cdbs, >

Re: Why are the buildds able to find a Build-Dep on their own?

2007-01-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 11:54:28AM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > > > And isn't it a good idea to declare a build-dep even in this case? > > > > proftpd would FTBS if libacl1-dev would drop its dependency on libattr1-dev. > > > > Is there a commonly accepted rule on these particular cases? > >

Re: RFS: sshproxy

2007-01-20 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -=| Vincent Bernat, 20.01.2007 21:23 |=- > But I get the point and fixed this problem by not using dh_installinit > and invoking rc.d "by hand". Strange. dh_installinit works for me every time. I don't use cdbs, however so I guess my case is not the

Re: RFS: libphp-phpmailer (updated package)

2007-01-20 Thread Daniel Baumann
uploaded. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT

RFS: libphp-phpmailer (updated package)

2007-01-20 Thread Kevin Coyner
Dear fellow mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.73-3 of my package "libphp-phpmailer". This package is already in the archives. I am simply taking over maintainer responsibilities. It builds these binary packages: libphp-phpmailer - full featured email transfer class for

Re: RFS: sshproxy

2007-01-20 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 20 janvier 2007, vers 18:53, Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > -=| Vincent Bernat, 20.01.2007 15:38 |=- >> It builds these binary packages: >> sshproxy - ssh gateway to apply ACLs on ssh connections >> sshproxy-backend-mysql - ssh gateway to ap

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

2007-01-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:46:20 +0100, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 11:38:39AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:17:27 +0100, Marc Haber >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> There is no need to fork ucf to create a command that provides >> functio

Re: Removing self-managed configuration files?

2007-01-20 Thread Florent Rougon
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The file is under ucf control (I omitted that to lessen complexity), Hey! We are doctors. You have to tell us _everything_. :-) > but ucf does not know about the file any more if it is not in the new > package and will therefore not handle it. Uh, if you

Re: RFS: sshproxy

2007-01-20 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Vinvent, Kust a tiny little comment: - -=| Vincent Bernat, 20.01.2007 15:38 |=- > It builds these binary packages: > sshproxy - ssh gateway to apply ACLs on ssh connections > sshproxy-backend-mysql - ssh gateway to apply ACLs on ssh connections

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

2007-01-20 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 11:38:39AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:17:27 +0100, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:31:11AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> This is the beauty of fre software. If you find it so frustrating, > >> write up a

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

2007-01-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:17:27 +0100, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:31:11AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> This is the beauty of fre software. If you find it so frustrating, >> write up a generic tool, and contribute it. And that would follow >> the grand old

Re: What to do if my package doesn't build on some architecture

2007-01-20 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote: I have come across an unexpected (serious), bug in my package libitpp, that it doesn't build on s390. Check http://bugs.debian.org/407555 [snip] Besides, I don't have access to such a machine! You can emulate an s390 using the package Hercules. Se

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

2007-01-20 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:31:11AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > This is the beauty of fre software. If you find it so > frustrating, write up a generic tool, and contribute it. And that > would follow the grand old UNIX tradition of each command doing one > thing well. The task at h

Re: RFS: sshproxy

2007-01-20 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du samedi 20 janvier 2007, vers 14:52, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> The package is almost lintian free. I have put an override for INSTALL >> which contains post-setup instructions. > Maybe it makes sense to move these instructions to a fil

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

2007-01-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:47:16 +0100, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Yes, that sounds sensible. It is, however, frustrating that there is > no method (for example, offered by ucf) to do this without that much > coding in maintainer scripts. This is the beauty of fre software. If y

Re: RFS: sshproxy

2007-01-20 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Bernat, On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 14:38 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sshproxy". > There is currently one bug in the package due to a problem in cdbs : > bug #386970. I don't know wthat the correct work around is. I'm sorry, I can't help you with this.

RFS: sshproxy

2007-01-20 Thread Vincent Bernat
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sshproxy". * Package name: sshproxy Version : 0.5.1 Upstream Author : David Guerizec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://penguin.fr/sshproxy/ * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang: Python Description

Re: What to do if my package doesn't build on some architecture

2007-01-20 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 12:52:29PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > So, check whether upstream can solve it and/or tag the bug 'help' and > send a mail to the relevant porters list. Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I shall act accordingly. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Insti

Re: What to do if my package doesn't build on some architecture

2007-01-20 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Kumar, On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 20:47 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Now, I would like to know how to bail the package out of this > situation. Do I try to fix the problem, referring it to upstream, or > is it that I should somehow block this architecture now and keep my > fingers crossed hoping it

Re: RFS: whitedune : Graphical VRML97 viewer, editor, 3D modeller and animation tool

2007-01-20 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Philippe, On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 00:35 +0100, Philippe Coval wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "whitedune". Thank you for your work. I've taken a look. I've got the following comments: debian/changelog: * The changelog mentions two previous versions from 2002, but I can't f

Re: Why are the buildds able to find a Build-Dep on their own?

2007-01-20 Thread Benjamin Mesing
> And isn't it a good idea to declare a build-dep even in this case? > > proftpd would FTBS if libacl1-dev would drop its dependency on libattr1-dev. > > Is there a commonly accepted rule on these particular cases? There is. If the package directly depends on libattr1-dev (this usually means it

Re: Why are the buildds able to find a Build-Dep on their own?

2007-01-20 Thread Julien Valroff
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:05:55AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:58:33AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > > while working on proftpd backport I've been stumbling about the fact > > that the proftpd package did not declare a build-dep on the libattr1-dev > > package. The p

Re: Why are the buildds able to find a Build-Dep on their own?

2007-01-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:58:33AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > while working on proftpd backport I've been stumbling about the fact > that the proftpd package did not declare a build-dep on the libattr1-dev > package. The package is clearly needed if you're going to build it by > hand. I've been

Why are the buildds able to find a Build-Dep on their own?

2007-01-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
Hi all, while working on proftpd backport I've been stumbling about the fact that the proftpd package did not declare a build-dep on the libattr1-dev package. The package is clearly needed if you're going to build it by hand. I've been expecting the package to FTBFS on the buildds but the opposite

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

2007-01-20 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:28:41PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > You will have to test with both sarge and etch dpkg (until after etch > releases). Colin Watson recently wrote [0] about one of the ssh bugs > and how this was complicated for him. > > You have to include the logic in the preinst, s

Re: Removing self-managed configuration files?

2007-01-20 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:26:45PM +0100, Florent Rougon wrote: > Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is that acceptable? Or is there anything easier, more elegant, more > > policy compliant? > > I think it's the usual, and correct way (sometimes actually performed by > ucf, but since you're

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

2007-01-20 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 09:43:04PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Marc Haber wrote: > > I have a package with a bunch of configuration files that are managed > > by my maintainer scripts and not by dpkg. I now need one of them > > (a.conf) to vanish. > > > > How do I do this in

Re: Removing self-managed conffiles?

2007-01-20 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Justin Pryzby wrote: > You will have to test with both sarge and etch dpkg (until after etch > releases). Colin Watson recently wrote [0] about one of the ssh bugs > and how this was complicated for him. > > You have to include the logic in the preinst, since the prerm is fo