Hello Paul,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:40:01 + (GMT)
Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm packaging myserver (http://www.myserverproject.net). It uses OpenSSL
> to serve HTTPS requests, and contains the following in its license:
>
> "MyServer is released under the terms of the GNU Gene
I'm packaging myserver (http://www.myserverproject.net). It uses OpenSSL
to serve HTTPS requests, and contains the following in its license:
"MyServer is released under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL)
with the additional exception that compiling, linking, and using OpenSSL
is all
Dear Moriyoshi:
What a coincidence! Maybe it is just because the number of sbml users
is larger and larger. :-)
I have try to use gcj-4.1 and free-java-sdk, but It always fail to
build. The potential cause may be the swig version or anything else, but
I didn't try to patch it. In t
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've written a tool that enable you to extract the information from
>> configuration files, check the data and write it back.
> Can you just extract the data too?
With a little modif of the main program, yes.
Now, the question is what you want to do w
Hi,
I've opened bug #394590 for about 100 days now and got no answer from
the maintainer (Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). The maintainer is
known to be MIA. I have sent him an email today to explain my intent to
do a NMU. Upstream has already applied the patch in his svn.
There is actually no
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 01:54, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A
> brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one
> called ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes made to the
> various source fil
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Dumb question: How this? debian/package.NEWS is (from man-page reading)
> just a different form for debian/NEWS and this file is installed
> as /usr/share/doc/package/NEWS.Debian.gz, which is not intended to
> contain the upstream NEWS file. Am I wrong?
Dear Moriyoshi,
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 08:37:55 Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Just a side note: I'm a full-time scientific programmer at the Keio
> University, working specifically on the E-Cell project
> (http://www.e-cell.org/ ) that aims to create a versatile in-silico
> simulator and related
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:06:19PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is the beauty of free software. If you find it so
> > frustrating, write up a generic tool, and contribute it. And that
> > would follow the grand old UNIX traditio
Am Dienstag, den 30.01.2007, 00:35 -0500 schrieb Justin Pryzby:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 30.01.2007, 01:54 +0100 schrieb Magnus Holmgren:
> > > I better ask this once and for all...
> > >
> > > I maintain a package where the upstream au
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>> This is common with Java packages built with Maven, where a detailed
>> commit log is automatically generated and included in the sources. In
>> that case I prefer to leave out the commit log altogether
> But what if Changes says "see ChangeLog for details"?
Mention of t
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is the beauty of free software. If you find it so
> frustrating, write up a generic tool, and contribute it. And that
> would follow the grand old UNIX tradition of each command doing one
> thing well.
I may be of some help here.
I'
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 08:52, Marcus Better wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A
> > brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one
> > called ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes mad
13 matches
Mail list logo
