gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:27:26 -0200, Fernando M.M. wrote:
Althought i have already seen some old discussion about packing the
webmail Roundcube (1) i have not found the package using the
package search (2).
[..]
Is someone working on it?
Seems so:
Hi, Andrew, Daniel and other mentors.
On Feb 21 2007, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
On 2/21/07, Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rarewares.org implies, that there is something wrong with these
packages. do they break copyrights or patents? Maybe they are a
candidate for
On Jan 14 2007, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I think Daniel's quality standards are not exceptionally high, or low,
compared to other sponsors. That is, if you don't consider a newline
in a textfile a quality measure of course.
But the other comments he makes, regarding: proper attribution of
Le samedi 24 février 2007 10:40, Krzysztof Burghardt a écrit :
Dear mentors,
Hi !
I am looking for a sponsor for my package clamfs.
Some remarks concerning your package:
* debian/Makefile.{am,in}, native pakage and .orig.tar.gz
Why do you ship thos files inside the debian/ directory.
OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du samedi 17 février 2007, vers
09:37, sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
imho, instead of explicitly setting it to en, you should try to
determine what the current language is (and fail back to en if you
can't). this is somewhat related to the
Michael Pobega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's GREATLY increasing the noise:signal
ratio for people who don't know about ignore thread or other such things.
It doesn't bother me personally (like I said I've found some of the messages
in this thread quite interesting... and if I don't feel
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who gives a shit about politics, and what the hell has it it got to do with
the debian mailing list???
It's the Debian *USER* list, not the *DEBIAN* User list. As has been
discussed several times every time a long thread comes up the list is for the
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Are you suggesting that instead of creating a debian off topic mailing
list, we should create a debian-help list instead, specifically mandated on
the topic of getting and giving help with debian?
Nope. Because such a list would then have to pull the people who
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:37:29PM -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Are you suggesting that instead of creating a debian off topic mailing
list, we should create a debian-help list instead, specifically mandated on
the topic of getting and giving help with debian?
debian-user's
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use mutt in non-threaded mode so I have no idea. :-)
So the list should adjust itself to how you read mail?
A list that the debian organization reccomends for new debian users to go
to seek help should be as accomodating to that goal as possible,
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
A list that the debian organization reccomends for new debian users to go
to seek help should be as accomodating to that goal as possible, including,
yes, adjusting it self to how everybody reads mail.
Nope. It should help people figure out a more efficient way of
On 2/26/07, Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, this proves the value of having a designated OT list signficantly
guys: Here is someone subscribed to the very mailing list that supposed to
help him learn more about debian, who is currently powerless to avoid the OT
spam that's
12 matches
Mail list logo
