Re: adding dirs to be ignored

2007-03-04 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:26:29 +0800 "Monty Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a sensible way to the list of -I options passed to > dpkg-source? > > My tree has SCCS dirs and I would like to exclude them, but I'd like > to do it in the most sensible way I can... Any kind of so

adding dirs to be ignored

2007-03-04 Thread Monty Taylor
Hi all, Is there a sensible way to the list of -I options passed to dpkg-source? My tree has SCCS dirs and I would like to exclude them, but I'd like to do it in the most sensible way I can... Thanks! Monty -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

2007-03-04 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:51:47AM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: > On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 12:15 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > > > Shouldn't the source package name reflect that it has been re-packaged? > > Something like "legends-0.4.1.42.ds.1" ? > > It should be documented in debian/README.Debian-

Re: Few questions

2007-03-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 16:08 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi! > > I have few questions that would help me to solve things in my package. I > have package1 and package2 being same but with different dependencies, > so the user can choose between them. > > First, if my package produces many binary

Re: RFS: chessdb (new version)

2007-03-04 Thread Christian Pinedo Zamalloa
Dear mentors, I have update the package chessdb to the new version released by the upstreamer, * Package name: chessdb Version : 3.6.15-1 Upstream Author : David Kirkby * URL : http://chessdb.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Section : games ChessDB

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

2007-03-04 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 12:15 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > - -=| Bart Martens, 4.03.2007 01:11 |=- > > Related to what Roberto wrote above about the shared libraries, here is > > how I would create the .orig.tar.gz : > > > > sh legends_linux-0.4

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

2007-03-04 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -=| Bart Martens, 4.03.2007 01:11 |=- > Related to what Roberto wrote above about the shared libraries, here is > how I would create the .orig.tar.gz : > > sh legends_linux-0.4.1.42.run --noexec --keep --nox11 \ > --target legends-0.4.1.42/legends

Re: Where to mention, when several tarballs are merged into one .orig.tar.gz

2007-03-04 Thread Florent Rougon
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still think that debian/copyright is a more natural location for this > information. debian/copyright is where we're required to specify the > source of the upstream tarball. Any customizations to the upstream > tarball seem to me to be part and parcel

Re: Where to mention, when several tarballs are merged into one .orig.tar.gz

2007-03-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Definitely README.Debian; probably a good idea in "copyright", where you >>> mention the download location. > The Developers Reference gives several useful hints for this situation > and suggests[1] to use

Re: Where to mention, when several tarballs are merged into one .orig.tar.gz

2007-03-04 Thread Florent Rougon
Hi, Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Definitely README.Debian; probably a good idea in "copyright", where you >> mention the download location. The Developers Reference gives several useful hints for this situation and suggests[1] to use a more specific file: README.Debian-source.