The package itself looks very good for me. I can also
sponsor the upload but what about Gustavo Noronha, I saw
that he sponsored the last uploads? I aks since my last
sponsoree told me that his sponsor is busy which was rather
not true :)
hi Nico,
Gustavo Noronha is one of my best friends, but h
Warren Turkal wrote:
> Kevin and other interested parties,
>
> New netcdf packages are up at [1]. All issues are fixed other than the
> netcdf-doc related issue.
>
> [1]http://www.penguintechs.org/~wt/debian/netcdf/
Hi Warren,
Let me preface this email by saying that all the comments below are
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:32:41AM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le jeudi 29 mars 2007 18:37, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> Hmm. I don't actually blindly apply .diff.gz to new upstream versions. I
>> usually just copy the debian/ directory across from my old one, inspect
>> the .diff.gz for any
Le jeudi 29 mars 2007 18:37, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> Hmm. I don't actually blindly apply .diff.gz to new upstream versions. I
> usually just copy the debian/ directory across from my old one, inspect
> the .diff.gz for any changes outside the debian/ directory, and consider
> whether they ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -=| Paul TBBle Hampson, 29.03.2007 19:37 |=-
> And
> although I haven't done it in a while, I don't recall dpatch-edit-patch
> being particularly fun to use on a non-applying patch...
My experience exactly. This is why I use quilt instead :)
Hi,
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-29 21:36]:
> * Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-29 21:06]:
> > I prepared a new upload for scim-uim, fixing an RC bug (#402869) about
> > missing dependency. However my co-maintainer and usual sponsor, Osamu
> > Aoki, is currently unable to do the
Hi!
* Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070329 20:48]:
> As I really want this fix to enter etch, I am asking for a one-time
> sponsor for scim-uim 0.1.4-2.
Done.
Greet Osamu for me,
Alexander
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
* Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-29 21:06]:
> I prepared a new upload for scim-uim, fixing an RC bug (#402869) about
> missing dependency. However my co-maintainer and usual sponsor, Osamu
> Aoki, is currently unable to do the sponsor work.
[...]
> diff -u scim-uim-0.1.4/debian/changel
Hello,
I prepared a new upload for scim-uim, fixing an RC bug (#402869) about
missing dependency. However my co-maintainer and usual sponsor, Osamu
Aoki, is currently unable to do the sponsor work.
As I really want this fix to enter etch, I am asking for a one-time
sponsor for scim-uim 0.1.4-2.
Michel Barret schreef:
> My name is Michel. I want help Debian and as I'm computer studen maybe can
> developpe for Debian!
[cut]
> You can see that my english is not good
No problem, my english is also bad ;-)
> So can I help anybody? What can I make to Debian?
The "Debian New Maintainers' Gu
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le jeudi 29 mars 2007 16:18, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> And again, if I was going to keep the debian/ directory in an external
>> version-control system, dpatch would be the way to go.
>> Since I'm not going to, the Debian arch
I'd like to add a point:
On Thursday 29 March 2007 17:33, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> A more general approach:
> * Check if any open source project you like is already in Debian
* If it's not, check if there is a request for it already
(http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/prospective), and if so,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:09:12AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:18:23AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> Again, I question the idea that a dpatch is _easier_ to parse than the
>> .diff.gz.
> Actually, I am sorry to critisize general problems of diff.gz in a
> di
Michel Barret wrote:
Hello everybody!
Hello Michel,
[snip]
So can I help anybody? What can I make to Debian?
A more general approach:
* Check if any open source project you like is already in Debian
* If it's not: File an ITP and create a package of that project
* Ask one of the DDs here t
2007/3/29, gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:31:28 +0200, Michel Barret wrote:
Bonjour Michel,
> My name is Michel. I want help Debian and as I'm computer studen maybe
can
> developpe for Debian!
[..]
> So can I help anybody? What can I make to Debian?
Thanks for yo
Le Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:18:23AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> Again, I question the idea that a dpatch is _easier_ to parse than the
> .diff.gz.
Hi,
Actually, I am sorry to critisize general problems of diff.gz in a
discussion about the particular one of your package, without having
l
Le Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 04:31:28PM +0200, Michel Barret a écrit :
>
>Hello everybody!
>My name is Michel. I want help Debian and as I'm computer studen maybe can
>developpe for Debian!
Bonjour Michel,
I do not know what is your field of study, but you may be intersted by
debian-scien
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:31:28 +0200, Michel Barret wrote:
Bonjour Michel,
> My name is Michel. I want help Debian and as I'm computer studen maybe can
> developpe for Debian!
[..]
> So can I help anybody? What can I make to Debian?
Thanks for your offer!
For getting ideas about how to get invo
Hello everybody!
My name is Michel. I want help Debian and as I'm computer studen maybe can
developpe for Debian!
My predilection langage is C/C++, but others lanages like python, perle or
java don't affraid me.
I know a bite the network but I can learn quickly if I know what learn (I'm
studen).
Le jeudi 29 mars 2007 16:18, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> And again, if I was going to keep the debian/ directory in an external
> version-control system, dpatch would be the way to go.
>
> Since I'm not going to, the Debian archive already has a system for
> storing such trivial patches, in the
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:13:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:41:40PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 04:54:52PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> >> * Any other user/DD may then see precisly what changes you are doing to
> >> upstream so
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2007, 20:41 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Le Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:30:02PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
> > > - If there are multiple upstream authors, it may look like that I am
> > > part of their team as there is no clear separator.
> >
> > Where is the problem?
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2007, 20:41 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Le Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:30:02PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
> > > - If there are multiple upstream authors, it may look like that I am
> > > part of their team as there is no clear separator.
> >
> > Where is the problem?
Le Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:30:02PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
> > - If there are multiple upstream authors, it may look like that I am
> > part of their team as there is no clear separator.
>
> Where is the problem? You can use
>
>
> Charles
> Plessy
> whatever
> Wro
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2007, 11:00 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
[docbook-xml/xsl for writing manpages]
> - The copyright statements are grouped together, so it its not obvious
> which one is for the manpage and which one is for the software.
I opened a feature request. I think about something
Le Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:41:40PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 04:54:52PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>
> > * Any other user/DD may then see precisly what changes you are doing to
> > upstream sources. You will also be able to seperate the changes that
> > perf
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 05:01:56PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> So what other alternatives are there, not counting help2man and pod2man?
I just recently tried txt2man.
The manpages were quite easy to produce, but the options in formatting
are limited and I'm not convinced it's produced particu
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 04:54:52PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> However, I see you have made significant changes to the makefile system, in
> order to create a shared object with the correct name and to link dynamically
> the utilities to the shared library, great !
These are not significant
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:06:10PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtk-vim-syntax".
Sorry for not seeing the initial ITP, but I object the package name. Can
you please rename it to "vim-syntax-gtk"? Even though we (Debian Vim
maintainers) haven't yet f
29 matches
Mail list logo
