On Monday 07 May 2007, John Stamp wrote:
> But will gconf have problems if 2 schema files are referencing the
> same url-handler?
Answering my own question: "Yes."
Let's say I have 2 packages 'a' and 'b' that want to register the same
keys but in different schema files.
Install a, gconf registe
Hello,
On 07/05/07, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors as well.
"Raphael Geissert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Build dependencies are ok now (I tested with pbuilder).
> Af
I maintain the package rpl, which today received an RC bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422604
because it FTBFS in an autobuild on Lucas.
The reason it failed is due to the use of unicode for the author's
name in the setup.py file.
distutils (for the setup.py file) is part
On 5/7/07, John Stamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Options:
>
> - give each package a unique schemas filename so that no conflict
> is needed
> - have one of the packages depend on the other (doesn't
> sound like a correct solution here)
> - have b
On Monday 07 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Options:
>
> - give each package a unique schemas filename so that no conflict
> is needed
> - have one of the packages depend on the other (doesn't
> sound like a correct solution here)
> - have both packages depend on a common file providing th
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:51:26PM -0700, John Stamp wrote:
> In my previous upload of lastfm I removed gconf/defaults/10_lastfm and
> used a gconf/schemas/lastfm.schemas file instead. This closed the
> following bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369907
> Unfortunately,
Hi all,
In my previous upload of lastfm I removed gconf/defaults/10_lastfm and
used a gconf/schemas/lastfm.schemas file instead. This closed the
following bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369907
Unfortunately, that conflicts with last-exit which also installs a
lastfm.s
Hi,
* Marvin Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-07 18:04]:
> On Monday 07 May 2007 17:49, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:12:33 +0200, Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D. wrote:
> > > I really enjoyed svn-buildpackage. Is there a similar system for hg /
> > > Mercurial?
> >
> > $ apt-cache sea
LOL. :) Why didn't I think of that? hahahaha Thanks! -r.
On 5/7/07, gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:12:33 +0200, Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D. wrote:
> I really enjoyed svn-buildpackage. Is there a similar system for hg /
> Mercurial?
$ apt-cache search --names-onl
On Monday 07 May 2007 17:49, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:12:33 +0200, Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D. wrote:
> > I really enjoyed svn-buildpackage. Is there a similar system for hg /
> > Mercurial?
>
> $ apt-cache search --names-only "\-buildpackage"
> [..]
> hg-buildpackage - Suite to h
On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:12:33 +0200, Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D. wrote:
> I really enjoyed svn-buildpackage. Is there a similar system for hg /
> Mercurial?
$ apt-cache search --names-only "\-buildpackage"
[..]
hg-buildpackage - Suite to help with Debian packages in Mercurial archives
(Never used it.
Hi everybody,
I am a recent hg ("Mercurial") revision control system convert. I came from
Subversion.
I really enjoyed svn-buildpackage. Is there a similar system for hg /
Mercurial?
Best regards,
Rudi
--
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-a
"Raphael Geissert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Build dependencies are ok now (I tested with pbuilder).
> After testing under a clean chroot I noticed that it doesn't depend at
> all on ffmpeg.
How that? are you shipping (yet another) private copy of the ffmpeg
source?
Please don't do that. Sup
On Mon, 7 May 2007 13:21:48 +0100
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While waiting to be assigned an AM I am still looking for sponsors to
> upload a variety of packages for me. Signed source and binary packages
> for them all can be found at
> http://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/debian-upload/$
While waiting to be assigned an AM I am still looking for sponsors to
upload a variety of packages for me. Signed source and binary packages
for them all can be found at
http://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/debian-upload/$package/ and details of each
package are below:
dbus-java
- new upstream release t
-=| Evgeni Golov, 6.05.2007 01:39 |=-
> On Sat, 05 May 2007 20:52:33 +0300 Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
>>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/revoco/revoco_0.3-1.dsc
>> SUID binary... this is scaring me. Is it really necessary?
>
> Well, it is not necessary, but helps $USER to control the m
16 matches
Mail list logo