Re: RFS: codeblocks

2007-06-15 Thread Erick Mattos
Helo Damyan, I've been working on the package lately and I think I've addressed all the issues you set. Let me know if it is ok to upload or if it needs any further changes. Thanks for your time. Best Regards, Erick Mattos. On Wednesday 13 June 2007 07:57, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > I am con

Re: RFS: codeblocks

2007-06-15 Thread Erick Mattos
Hello Damyan, I've been working on the package lately and I think I've addressed all the issues you set. Let me know if it is ok to upload or if it needs any further changes. Thanks for your time. Best Regards, Erick Mattos. On Wednesday 13 June 2007 07:57, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > I am co

Re: RFS: kicad (updated package)

2007-06-15 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 10:31:01AM +0100, Richard A Burton wrote: > On 15/06/07, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >A drive-by diff review: > Do I need to increment the Debian part of the version number to upload > to the mentors site? I'd assume it'd be happy with another upload of > -1 sinc

Re: RFS: kicad (updated package)

2007-06-15 Thread Richard Burton
> > No problem, thanks for your time. If you know anyone that would be > > able to help please point them in my direction. > There are some tips for this sort of thing in the mentors FAQ. Perhaps > someone on debian-science might be interested. Sponsor now found, should be uploading next week. T

Re: RFS: kicad (updated package)

2007-06-15 Thread Paul Wise
On 6/15/07, Richard Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No problem, thanks for your time. If you know anyone that would be able to help please point them in my direction. There are some tips for this sort of thing in the mentors FAQ. Perhaps someone on debian-science might be interested. -- bye

Re: RFS: kicad (updated package)

2007-06-15 Thread Richard Burton
> Hmmm, ok. BTW, I suggest you don't add this phrase to the English docs > package: > > 'Documentation varies by language. Where the main help files are not > available in your language English will be used instead.' > > I'd also suggest removing it from all the other doc package > descriptions ex

Re: RFS: crosstex

2007-06-15 Thread Robert Burgess
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 18:21 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Why don't you use http://mentors.debian.net ? > It's an easy way to upload and track your packages, not to mention the > fact that the upload system is similar to the one used in ftp-master. I will; thank you for the advice. Robert

Re: RFS: kicad (updated package)

2007-06-15 Thread Paul Wise
On 6/15/07, Richard A Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As of last week I now have write access to the kicad dev svn repository (in fact it's only as of about 2 weeks ago that there was an upstream dev repo at all). So patches have gone upstream, except the debpatchs one (see below). Excellent

Re: RFS: kicad (updated package)

2007-06-15 Thread Richard A Burton
On 15/06/07, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A drive-by diff review: Thanks for taking a look. Perhaps add descriptions and your name to the dpatches. Done. Have you sent the patches and the .desktop file upstream? As of last week I now have write access to the kicad dev svn reposi

Re: Adopting boa

2007-06-15 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi François-Denis, > I'm looking into adopting the small webserver boa. The package has > received a number of NMU over the years and has recently been uploaded by > Debian-QA. I > know the proper procedure if I adopt boa would be to close the bugs fixed > by NMU, but that seem as simple to me a