RFS: hwinfo (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread William Vera
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 13.35-2 of my package "hwinfo". It builds these binary packages: hwinfo - Hardware identification system libhd13- Hardware identification system library libhd13-dev - Hardware identification system library and headers libhd13-do

Re: ampache sponsor

2007-07-03 Thread Paul Wise
On 7/1/07, Charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ampache- A web based audio file management system written in PHP I attended the debian-security talk at debconf. Lets just say that PHP isn't popular with them :) Have you audited the code so that the security team don't have to do it when you

Re: RFS: command-not-found

2007-07-03 Thread Michael Vogt
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:46:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > >> Dear mentors, [..] > >> It builds these binary packages: > >> command-not-found - Suggest installation of packages in interactiv

Re: RFS: alien-arena - First person online deathmatch shooter

2007-07-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:11:33AM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > On 6/29/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I have looked at your package. It looks good and is working. I would > >just suggest you shorten the texts in debian/copyright and > >debian/control to less than 80 characters pe

RFS: tclodbc

2007-07-03 Thread Daniel Rus Morales
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tclodbc". * Package name: tclodbc Version : 2.5-1 Upstream Author : Roy Nurmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/tclodbc * License : BSD Section : devel It builds the

Re: RFS: hwinfo (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi, On Tuesday 3 July 2007 10:11, William Vera wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 13.35-2 > of my package "hwinfo". Thanks for taking the time to adopt an orphaned package. I've checked it out and found: * You're adding a file .pc/.version, probably by accident? * There se

Licensing problems for mpeg2vidcodec

2007-07-03 Thread François Févotte
Dear Mentors, I would like to package mpeg2vidcodec, which the reference implementation of the MPEG2 codec provided by the MPEG Software Simulation Group[1]. It provides two binaries (mpeg2encode and mpeg2decode), which are needed by ImageMagick to handle MPEG files. However, the authors of this

Re: Licensing problems for mpeg2vidcodec

2007-07-03 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:49:36 +0200 "François Févotte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > I would like to package mpeg2vidcodec, which the reference > implementation of the MPEG2 codec provided by the MPEG Software > Simulation Group[1]. > > However, the authors of this software seem t

Re: Licensing problems for mpeg2vidcodec

2007-07-03 Thread Thomas Jollans
On Tuesday 03 July 2007, François Févotte wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > I would like to package mpeg2vidcodec, which the reference > implementation of the MPEG2 codec provided by the MPEG Software > Simulation Group[1]. It provides two binaries (mpeg2encode and > mpeg2decode), which are needed by Imag

Re: RFS: alien-arena - First person online deathmatch shooter

2007-07-03 Thread Andres Mejia
On 7/3/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The README.Debian still contains very long lines. Perhaps that can be fixed in a next revision. Other than that the package looks good to me and I'm currently uploading it. Will probably take a while through my 384 kbps uplink. Cheers Christ

RFS: secpanel (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Bruno Costacurta
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-1 of my package "secpanel". It builds these binary packages: secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 317063 The package can be found on m

Re: ITS: libitpp (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:26:34 +0530 Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'll look into this. What is the alternative to lapack? > > > > I'm not sure there is one - lapack isn't the same kind of problem as > > OK, so here's the plan. I keep the dependency on lapack as it is, and > keep c

Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Zack Weinberg
The Debian packages of monotone have not been updated in some time, and are currently both unbuildable and uninstallable, due to the Boost 1.34 transition. I am one of the upstream developers, and use Debian myself; I asked the maintainer (Shaun Jackman) if he needed help and he said yes, would I

Re: ITS: libitpp (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:08:36 +0100 Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now, the updated package is at: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-1.dsc > > Checking it now. If it builds OK, I'll upload. I've checked with pbuilder, installed, uninstalled, purg

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Shaun Jackman
Hello Zack, I unexpectedly have access to a Debian box all this week. I'm on contract and have other commitments, but I should be able to upload monotone for you at some point. My only question is whether the unusual -0.2 version will bungle anything -- although I understand the version number is

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 7/3/07, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I unexpectedly have access to a Debian box all this week. I'm on contract and have other commitments, but I should be able to upload monotone for you at some point. My only question is whether the unusual -0.2 version will bungle anything -- alt

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 7/3/07, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I *think* dupload should do the Right Thing if applied to the changes file as is (well, re-signed). As a sponsored upload, I'd normally have to rebuild the binaries and the changes file as well. What magic debuild command line did you use? I s

ampache security audit

2007-07-03 Thread Charlie
Paul Wise wrote: > > On 7/1/07, Charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> >> ampache- A web based audio file management system written in PHP >> > > > > I attended the debian-security talk at debconf. Lets just say that PHP > > isn't popular with them :) Have you audited the code s

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Jan C. Nordholz
Hi Shaun, > As a sponsored upload, I'd normally have to rebuild the binaries and > the changes file as well. What magic debuild command line did you use? > I see the .orig.tar.gz file is included in the `Files' section of the > .changes file. debuild -sa should do the trick (-sa is passed through

Re: ampache security audit

2007-07-03 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, > You can look at ampaches Code Philosophy at > https://ampache.bountysource.com/wiki/Code_Philosophy > > and ampaches Coding Standards at > https://ampache.bountysource.com/wiki/Coding_Standards that's nice to read, but people who write the code should not audit it imho. It's like reading

RE: ampache security audit

2007-07-03 Thread Charlie
Dear Mr. Bernd Zeimetz Thank you for your comments > > You can look at ampaches Code Philosophy at > > https://ampache.bountysource.com/wiki/Code_Philosophy > > > > and ampaches Coding Standards at > > https://ampache.bountysource.com/wiki/Coding_Standards > that's nice to read, but people

Re: ITS: libitpp (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:30:48PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > > Now, the updated package is at: > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-1.dsc > > > > Checking it now. If it builds OK, I'll upload. > > I've checked with pbuilder, installed, uninstalled, purge

Re: ITS: libitpp (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:45:43 +0530 Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, not just for the upload, but for the hints which made me > become a wiser maintainer! :-) > Will you be in a position to sponsor future uploads as well? The > package receives updates once every month or so. Ye