Re: RFS: ninja

2007-07-09 Thread William Vera
Hello El sáb, 07-07-2007 a las 21:57 +1000, Paul Wise escribió: > On 7/5/07, William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ninja/ninja_0.1.2-1.diff.gz > > No time for sponsoring, some comments: > I see the security issues mentioned in the ITP have bee

Bug#432472: RFP: galaxy -- interactive web tool for comparative genomics

2007-07-09 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: galaxy Version : Revision 1715 Upstream Author : The Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics at Penn State URL : http://g2.trac.bx.psu.edu/ License : MIT Programming Lang: mostly python Descrip

Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)

2007-07-09 Thread Paul Wise
On 7/10/07, Bruno Costacurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm a newbie as maintainer : I suppose I can close this bug #305135 once this package is uploaded to Debian repos by a mentor ? Usually one would put something like this in the changelog: * New upstream release (Closes: #305135) If it

RFS: hwb (Closing ITA.)

2007-07-09 Thread Robert James Clay
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:040412-3 of the Debian package "hwb", which I am adopting. It builds this binary (all) package: hwb- The Hardware Book The package is lintian clean. The upload would close this bug: 363504 (ITA for hwb). There are no ot

Re: RFS: syck

2007-07-09 Thread Thomas Jollans
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 00:05 +0200, Thomas Jollans wrote: > The upload would fix these bugs: 324316, 359245, 378440, 415217, 418308 The new FTBTS bug #432416 would also be fixed by this upload. (I've re-uploaded the package with the changelog accordingly adapted) I am still looking for a sponsor,

RFS: secpanel (updated package)

2007-07-09 Thread Bruno Costacurta
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-1 of my package "secpanel". It builds these binary packages: secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The upload would fix these bugs: 317063 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.d

Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)

2007-07-09 Thread Bruno Costacurta
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:15, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > Otherwise it looks fine. > > One more thing: there's some bugs open against the package, including a > wishlist bug regarding a new upstream version. Perhaps you want to take a > look at t

Re: RFS: secpanel (updated package)

2007-07-09 Thread Bruno Costacurta
On Sunday 08 July 2007 13:05, Paul Wise wrote: > On 7/8/07, Bruno Costacurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Any reason for using debhelper 4 instead of 5? > > > > I used dpkg-buildpackage to build package secpanel 0.5.2-1 > > Should I avoid dpkg-xxx and prefer debhelper tools ? > > By debhelper 5

Re: OpenBook (O'Reilly) packing or Debian

2007-07-09 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:12:27 -0700 Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> For example: > >> > >> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba2/book/toc.html > >> > >> has the GFDL appended to the book, b

Re: OpenBook (O'Reilly) packing or Debian

2007-07-09 Thread Russ Allbery
Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> For example: >> >> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba2/book/toc.html >> >> has the GFDL appended to the book, but I see no explicit statement that >> the book is actually under the GFDL and, if so, what

Re: RFS: libtie-cache-perl (updated package)

2007-07-09 Thread Bart Martens
Hi list, I'm already sponsoring this package. I'll answer to the packager via private e-mail. Hi Deepak, no need to post a RFS on debian-mentors if you already have a sponsor. Unless you want to get rid of me. :) On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 18:27 +, Deepak Tripathi wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I

Re: OpenBook (O'Reilly) packing or Debian

2007-07-09 Thread Ricardo Mones
Hi, On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:17:11 -0700 Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > For some time I have downloaded the entired OpenBook folder of O'Reilly > > and packed if to my own use and my friends. > > > Since the O'Reilly License permit

RFS: libperlmenu-perl (updated package)

2007-07-09 Thread Deepak Tripathi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0-5 of my package "libperlmenu-perl". It builds these binary packages: libperlmenu-perl - Menu and Template (curses-based) UI for Perl The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 411104 The package ca

Re: OpenBook (O'Reilly) packing or Debian

2007-07-09 Thread Russ Allbery
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For some time I have downloaded the entired OpenBook folder of O'Reilly > and packed if to my own use and my friends. > Since the O'Reilly License permit redistribution I now ask here, whether > it is worth to file an ITP/RFS for those Documentations

RFS: libtie-cache-perl (updated package)

2007-07-09 Thread Deepak Tripathi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.17-3 of my package "libtie-cache-perl". It builds these binary packages: libtie-cache-perl - LRU Cache in Memory The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 279807 The package can be found on mentors.

OpenBook (O'Reilly) packing or Debian

2007-07-09 Thread Michelle Konzack
# ATTENTION: I am currently NOT in Strasbourg because# # haveing the last 4 weeks of my military # # service and can not reply in short delays. # ###