Re: Auto-building many manpages: redundant work for the buildds ?

2007-07-20 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:05:45PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit : > > This would violate the Debian Policy section 12.1, reading "[..] Each > program, utility, and function should have an associated manual page > included in the same package. [..]". Hi Daniel, Since it is not a MUST, but just a

Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems

2007-07-20 Thread Paul Wise
On 7/20/07, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It is quite nice that you have shown some interest in hfsprogs. I will explain what you have asked. I don't really have any interest in them (don't interact with Macs at the moment), my motivation for the question was to perhaps get those th

to use upstream scons or not

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
When you have a upstream package that are using scons, is there a good way to incorperate that into a debian package, or should a new build script be written? I was mostly thinking about http://www.imagemagick.org/download/python/ as it's script is rather platform-specific. /Carl -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: Nagios version

2007-07-20 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Friday 20 July 2007 22:53, Christoph Haas wrote: > David, > > please use your real email address. workaround.org is a domain hosted by > myself and I'm pretty positive I didn't give you a freedotfr hostname in > that domain. "Dudu" obviously sent a mail with an unqualified address in the From:

Package removals: when are "Documents" removed:?

2007-07-20 Thread Robert James Clay
All, When are 'documents' removed during the removal or purge of a package? I am working on re-packaging Fidogate (dropped from Debian after sarge) & the following errors come up during a package removal or purge in a test install (under Etch): Removing fidogate ... Document `fidog

Re: Nagios version

2007-07-20 Thread Christoph Haas
David, please use your real email address. workaround.org is a domain hosted by myself and I'm pretty positive I didn't give you a freedotfr hostname in that domain. Christoph -- Peer review means that you can feel better because someone else missed the problem, too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

[uploaded] RFS: dot2tex (updated package)

2007-07-20 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * Peter Collingbourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070717 18:40]: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.5.0-1 [..] > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Uploaded. Minor remark: in debian/copyright you have "Debian packaging is (C) 2006". Obviously you did somethi

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
Have updated the package now, and I think it's only the licensing issue still in need of taking care about. See: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-plastex/ /Carl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: NMU for gidentd

2007-07-20 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Hi, Could some one review and upload my NMU for gidentd. Packages available at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gidentd/gidentd_0.4.5+dfsg1-0.1.dsc Regards Laurent Bigonville pgpw7awovT3Mb.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Nagios version

2007-07-20 Thread The Fungi
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 05:23:20PM +0200, David Dumortier wrote: [...] > But I'm a bit confused about the version of the Debian package. Is > there a licence problem about the version upload ? [...] > so I might help for a new release more recent of nagios. [...] What version are you looking for?

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 7/20/07, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Probably reading the New Maintainer's reference and the other documents linked on http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#maint-guide could be useful for you. Best regards, Bernd Zeimetz Hehe, have read that million of times :) I mostly

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > On 7/20/07, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > how do you mean by "provide a way to repackage the upstream tarball"? >> >> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-origtargz >> > > I would need some help in

Nagios version

2007-07-20 Thread David Dumortier
Hello, First I'm not fluently in english, I hope my thought will be clear, it's an asking mail. :-) I currently deploy nagios and nagiosgraph. So I decide to package nagiosgraph. But I'm a bit confused about the version of the Debian package. Is there a licence problem about the version upload ?

(no subject)

2007-07-20 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
subscribe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 7/20/07, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how do you mean by "provide a way to repackage the upstream tarball"? http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-origtargz I would need some help interpret that. 1. must contain detaile

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > How common is this? i.e. would it be time to implement something like > dh_pystrip debhelper thingi? imho you want to send a bugreport to upstream instead. Cheers, Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
How common is this? i.e. would it be time to implement something like dh_pystrip debhelper thingi? /Carl On 7/20/07, François Févotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, On 7/20/07, Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > lintian spits out warnings about -x flag on the py-files, as they al

RFS: nagiosgrapher

2007-07-20 Thread Hendrik Frenzel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nagiosgrapher". * Package name: nagiosgrapher Version : 1.6.1rc3-1 Upstream Author : Gerd Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.nagiosexchange.org/NagiosG

Re: OFF: centerim -- A text-mode multi-protocol instant messenger client

2007-07-20 Thread Anibal Avelar
I've got a couple of questions here :) : 1. Why has centerim been rejected in the previous upload? It was rejected due to license problems. I fixed together the upstreams. Just were details. 2. Were my patches included into new package or not? ;) No, they weren't (yet). this version is base

"Problem" with git while packaging

2007-07-20 Thread Manuel Prinz
[ I think this is not suited for -user, so asking here. ] Dear Mentors, I started using git for packaging because serveral people at DebConf where really enthusiastic about it. So far, I can totally understand why. It's just great! Nevertheless, a "problem" I run into is the following: I started

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread François Févotte
Hello, On 7/20/07, Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: lintian spits out warnings about -x flag on the py-files, as they all has a shebang, also the setup.py generates a cgpdfpng that only will work under OSX, but I don't know a good way to fix that. to remove unneeded shebang lines, I

Re: Auto-building many manpages: redundant work for the buildds ?

2007-07-20 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Freitag, den 20.07.2007, 12:16 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy: [EMBOSS manual pages] > Discussing with Nelson, the co-maintainer of emboss, we were wondering > if this mass-building was a bit a waste of buildd time since they are > all the same for all arches, and if we could build them offline a

Re: Auto-building many manpages: redundant work for the buildds ?

2007-07-20 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Freitag, den 20.07.2007, 11:37 +0200 schrieb David Paleino: > 2007/7/20, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > ... > > > > Discussing with Nelson, the co-maintainer of emboss, we were wondering > > if this mass-building was a bit a waste of buildd time since they are > > all the same for a

Re: Auto-building many manpages: redundant work for the buildds ?

2007-07-20 Thread David Paleino
2007/7/20, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ... Discussing with Nelson, the co-maintainer of emboss, we were wondering if this mass-building was a bit a waste of buildd time since they are all the same for all arches, and if we could build them offline and ship them in the diff instead. What

RFS: sbox-dtc (updated package with pending RC bugfix)

2007-07-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi there ! As Daniel Baumann do not sponsor packages anymore, im looking for someone who can sponsor and upload my package of sbox-dtc. Files are here: ftp://ftp.gplhost.com/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/sbox-dtc_1.11-1.dsc Thanks and bye, Thomas Goirand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

RFS: mxml (updated package)

2007-07-20 Thread Luis Uribe
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3-1 of my package "mxml". It builds these binary packages: libmxml-dev - development files for libmlxml libmxml1 - small XML parsing library The package appears to be lintian clean, but there is a problem with linda: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems

2007-07-20 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:40:52PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: > I made a package for creating and checking HFS(+) filesystems. The basic > information about this package is here Thanks for your quite well written explenation of the corelation of the packages. I take it that you have pretty well

RFS: typo3

2007-07-20 Thread Christian Welzel
Hi there ! As Daniel Baumann do not sponsor packages anymore, im looking for someone who can sponsor and upload my packages of typo3. You can find the neccessary files here: http://typo3.camlann.de/typo3-dummy_4.1.2-1.dsc http://typo3.camlann.de/typo3-src_4.1.2+debian-1.dsc I would be fine if