RFS: gnome-specimen

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-specimen". * Package name: gnome-specimen Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : Wouter Bolsterlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : * License : GPL Section

Re: List of (un)sponsored packages on Mentors (approximate)

Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, the list is a HTML page, with every package having a link. The > link points to the RFS message in the Debian Mentors archive. > > See it at: > http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/Mentors/output.html I fear there are some false positives. For examp

Re: [Pkg-nagios-devel] RFS: nagiosgrapher

hi hendrik, i found the following lintian warnings: W: nagiosgrapher: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/nagiosgrapher W: nagiosgrapher: file-in-unusual-dir var/log/nagiosgrapher/ngraph.log W: nagiosgrapher: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/nagiosgrapher/htdocs/images/logos/dot.png W: nagio

Re: RFS: php-file (updated package) [UPLOADED]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 06:12:47AM +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote: > > I am Gregory Colpart [http://wiki.debian.org/GregoryColpart] > and I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.0-1 > of my package "php-file". This package is being adopted. This package is now sponsored/uploaded. Regard

Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems

Dear Adam, On Jul 18 2007, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote: > There are several things that looks supicious: > * The patch that fix fsck -a switch has gone > * No more hack to build with -m32 on amd64 (won't probably work) Could you please address these issues in more detail, please? I'm in touch

Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems

Rogério Brito a écrit : Dear Adam, On Jul 18 2007, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote: There are several things that looks supicious: * The patch that fix fsck -a switch has gone * No more hack to build with -m32 on amd64 (won't probably work) Could you please address these issues in more

Re: Doubts about PHP

On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 02:47:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 07:12:47PM +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:06:14PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > That's exactly the reason why I recommend to Depend on php5. > > > $ apt-cache show php5

RFS: wotsap -- OpenPGP Web of Trust statistics and pathfinder

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wotsap". * Package name: wotsap Version : 0.6-2 Upstream Author : Jörgen Cederlöf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.lysator.liu.se/~jc/wotsap/index.html * License : GPL Section : misc It b

Re: RFS: wotsap -- OpenPGP Web of Trust statistics and pathfinder

Hi Giovanni, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wotsap". This page looks good. I've got a few small comments: General: * Have you checked that you conform with the Debian Python Policy? debian/rules: * Why do you run dh_clean -k in the install target? I don't quite understand that

Re: List of (un)sponsored packages on Mentors (approximate)

On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 09:30 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Also, the list is a HTML page, with every package having a link. The > > link points to the RFS message in the Debian Mentors archive. > > > > See it at: > > http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/M

Re: Nagios version

Le ven jui 20 2007 ? 05:07:24 +, The Fungi dit : > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 05:23:20PM +0200, David Dumortier wrote: > [...] > > But I'm a bit confused about the version of the Debian package. Is > > there a licence problem about the version upload ? > [...] > > so I might help for a new release

RFS: typo3-src and typo3-dummy (updated packages)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1.2+debian-1 of my packages "typo3-src" and "typo3-dummy". They build these binary packages: typo3 - Powerful content management framework (Meta package) typo3-src-4.1 - Powerful content management framework (Core) typo3-dummy -

Re: Nagios version

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 06:45:54PM +0200, David Dumortier wrote: [...] > - for installation I have perms on directories to set, must I put them > on nagiosgraph.postinst ? man dh_fixperms > - what about the version's number ? must I put a 0.9.0 as > nagiosgraph's version or must I take a 0.9.0-0.

Re: [Pkg-nagios-devel] RFS: nagiosgrapher

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, sean finney schrieb: > i found the following lintian warnings: Thanks for your notes. I fixed them all in my new packages which I already upladed to mentors.d.n. The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/m

Re: RFS: gnome-specimen

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:35:17PM +0530, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-specimen". > > * Package name: gnome-specimen > Version : 0.3-1 > Upstream Author : Wouter Bolsterlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL

Re: [Pkg-nagios-devel] RFS: nagiosgrapher

On Monday 23 July 2007 10:23:21 pm Hendrik Frenzel wrote: > > Thanks for your notes. > I fixed them all in my new packages which I already upladed to > mentors.d.n. > > The respective dsc file can be found at: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nagiosgrapher/nagiosgrapher_1. >6.1rc3-2.d

RFS: python-plastex

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-plastex". * Package name: python-plastex Version : 0.8.2-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section

Re: RFS: python-plastex

Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-plastex". again, a short review from me - although I can't sponsor you. * debian/changelog can be shortened, as it was never uploaded to Debian. The initial release entry is enough * debian/control: you probably want to stay with upstream'

Re: RFS: python-plastex

> * debian/docs: what about the documentation in Doc? You want to add it > to the pacakge, if the license allows it. Please note that latex2html is > in non-free. You may not use it or the results form it. But using latex > to create pdfs/ps files is fine. of course, that's not a problem here, as

Re: RFS: python-plastex

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:47:25PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > > * debian/docs: what about the documentation in Doc? You want to add it > > to the pacakge, if the license allows it. Please note that latex2html is > > in non-free. You may not use it or the results form it. But using latex > > t

Re: ITS: libitpp (minor update)

On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 20:14:00 +0100 Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:18:35 +0530 > Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > I am in need of another upload of IT++, the details of which are here: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentor

Re: RFS: python-plastex

Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:47:25PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >>> * debian/docs: what about the documentation in Doc? You want to add it >>> to the pacakge, if the license allows it. Please note that latex2html is >>> in non-free. You may not use it or the resul

Re: RFS: python-plastex

On 7/23/07, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > again, a short review from me - although I can't sponsor you. > > * debian/changelog can be shortened, as it was never uploaded to Debian. > The initial release entry is enough I shouldn't tell in the changelog that I've patched? > * d

Re: RFS: python-plastex

Have corrected most of the points you told me, but I really don't know how to build the documentation using the just built program, though I have uploaded a new one one, it's http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plastex/ now, as I changed back the source name. /Carl DSC: http://mentors.de

Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems

Hi, Adam. On Jul 23 2007, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote: > Rogério Brito a écrit : >> Dear Adam, >>> * The patch that fix fsck -a switch has gone This one I have included, as it is *really* trivial. >>> * No more hack to build with -m32 on amd64 (won't probably work) Indeed, it segfaults witho

Re: RFS: python-plastex

Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > Have corrected most of the points you told me, but I really don't know > how to build the documentation using the just built program, just use pdflatex, as described in Doc/README. I guess we can live without a html documentation, but if there's one, it should be shipped.

Re: RFS: python-plastex

On 7/24/07, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your debian/copyright file is still not complete. > First you have to mention which files are under a different > License/Copyright. To do this, and to make sure there's no > undistributeable stuff in there, you have to take a look at every fil

Re: RFS: python-plastex

> Gosh, I didn't know there was so many problems, I have forwarded your > mail to upstream, and awaits his response. Will do a more thorough > look also. then let's hope that upstream likes Debian :) Not every upstream is interested in removing/replacing stuff under CC - as it is a license that

Re: RFS: gnome-specimen

On 7/24/07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:35:17PM +0530, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-specimen". Hi Mike, First of all, thanks for looking at package! Just a few notes: - In

Re: ITS: libitpp (minor update)

Dear Neil, On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:54:09PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > One glitch, Kumar, have you tried to build with the alternative tex support? > > debian/control specifies: tetex-bin | texlive-base-bin [snip] > I suspect one of the packages brought in by tetex-bin is also needed > for t

Re: RFS: gnome-specimen

On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:22:02AM +0530, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/24/07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:35:17PM +0530, Kartik Mistry >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Dear mentors, >> > >> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "