Justin Pryzby schrieb:
It would be a pro to take this into the policy, wouldn't it?
It is 9.3.2:
| [...]
No, it isn't. This part of the policy just says that it should not kill
other processes, which are eventually named unfortunately, just because
the process it *should* kill does not
Policy 8.1 is clear - if the bug documents a crash in an application
that was not present before the library was updated and the library
has not changed the SONAME or package name, the library justifies an
RC bug.
Actually, Policy 8.1 doesn't say anything about when to change the
On 2007-09-12, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/09/2007, Francesco Cecconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2007, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On 10/09/2007, Francesco Cecconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear DD,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Other minor details:
* debian/copyright says Upstream Author but there are two authors listed.
Done.
Francesco
--
Francesco Cecconi ' |BrAnD| '
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key ID: 11F6E468 | Debian pkg Maintainer
Key fingerprint = A45A 59F0
2007/9/11, Jens Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:38:06PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
I uploaded the package. I still have some comments (see below), but
they weren't enough reason to not upload.
Thanks.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
Thierry Randrianiriana [EMAIL PROTECTED] (07/09/2007):
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.6+debian-1
of my package glchess.
Since this game is included in gnome-games, does it make sense to keep
it in a single package?
The upload would fix these bugs: 421694, 441156
I missed
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gpicview.
* Package name: gpicview
Version : 0.1.3-1
Upstream Author : PCMan (Hong Jen Yee) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://lxde.sourceforge.net/gpicview/
* License : GPL version 2
Section :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gbrainy.
* Package name: gbrainy
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Jordi Mas i Hernandez
* URL : http://live.gnome.org/gbrainy
* License : GPLv2+
Section : games
It builds these binary
Hi,
Il giorno mer, 12/09/2007 alle 18.23 +0200, Siegfried-Angel ha scritto:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gbrainy.
* Package name: gbrainy
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Jordi Mas i Hernandez
* URL : http://live.gnome.org/gbrainy
Hi,
Please merge changelog entries, it looks a bit strange to have -0 as
initial upload, as initial version in archive should be -1.
done.
W: ario source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.log
W: ario: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/ario
I: ario:
Greetings,
I've put a NMU of the opencity pacakge on mentors. I'm not looking to
hijack the package, just fix some serious policy violations.
The package was breaking FHS, so I rebuilt it for my own system after I
filed a bug. In doing so I noticed a couple of copyright problems and
filed
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package panelfm.
* Package name: panelfm
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream Author : M.K.Srikant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://panelfm.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Section : gnome
It builds these binary
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:10:25 -0700
Thanasis Kinias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The package was breaking FHS,
Details? Is the breakage RC?
so I rebuilt it for my own system after I
filed a bug.
Number?
In doing so I noticed a couple of copyright problems and
filed those bugs too.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package canorus.
* Package name: canorus
Version : 0.3.1-1
Upstream Author : [Matevž Jekovec - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : [http://www.canorus.org]
* License : [GPLv2]
Section : sound
It builds these
Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Justin Pryzby schrieb:
It would be a pro to take this into the policy, wouldn't it?
It is 9.3.2:
| [...]
No, it isn't.
Yes, it is. You can dissect the paragraph in 3 ideas:
- Behave sensibly when invoked with 'start' and already running
- Behave sensibly
On 9/13/07, Marc Pavot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
W: ario source: configure-generated-file-in-source
config.log
I have fixed all this warnings (but I'm not really sure of solution for the
first one).
A simple 'rm config.log' in the clean rule of debian/rules should do it.
--
bye,
pabs
I'm confused about the busybox package. I mean, I'm familiar with
busybox and it's applications. However, I'm wondering...
If there a reason why busybox should not be packaged in such a way as to
provide a mutually exclusive alternative with the packages that it
supplants such as coreutils?
K. Richard Pixley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there a reason why busybox should not be packaged in such a way as
to provide a mutually exclusive alternative with the packages that it
supplants such as coreutils?
It doesn't supplant them. The busybox package installs exactly one
executable:
Dear mentors,
This is an update to DrScheme which is already in Debian. It is basically the
upstream update plus some rather conservative changes, especially around the
web server.
I would be happy if someone could check this package. There are a few lintian
errors but none of them seemed
Hi
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:32:08 +0200
Marc Pavot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
W: ario source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.log
W: ario: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/ario
I: ario: desktop-entry-contains-encoding-key
./usr/share/applications/ario.desktop:2 Encoding
W: ario:
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/09/2007):
The package was breaking FHS,
Details? Is the breakage RC?
Two docs files outside /usr/share/doc. He probably couldn't read
“should” in Policy 12.3.
Number?
#442029
Please note that I didn't reach the retitle[1] when I answered.
1.
[ I bounced the two previous mails to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put the list back in the loop with this mail. ]
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (12/09/2007):
My questions about the exact content of the bug remains, because “FHS
violations” isn't self-explanatory.
For the sake of
22 matches
Mail list logo
