Hello Debian Mentors,
I have a few PHP packages which may be appropriate for inclusion in
the debian repositories.
http://www.docunext.com/2007/10/19/no-php5-readline-in-debian/
http://www.docunext.com/2007/10/26/nyt-xslcache/
Can someone advise me on what I'm doing right and wrong in preparing
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:07:52PM -0300, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "catfish".
IANADD so I cannot sponsor your upload. Anyway some comments:
* debian/rules:
- clean target does not work
- unneeded debhelper comments
- some unneeded sp
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.5.0.dfsg-1
of my package "cegui-mk2".
It builds these binary packages:
libcegui-mk2-1 - Crazy Eddie's GUI (libraries)
libcegui-mk2-1-dbg - Crazy Eddie's GUI (debugging libraries)
libcegui-mk2-dev - Crazy Eddie's GUI (development fil
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.2-1
of my package "yacas".
It builds these binary packages:
yacas - Computer Algebra System
yacas-doc - Documentation for Yacas
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 358401, 424878, 424889
James Antill wrote:
> Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> James Antill wrote:
>>> That code is basically:
>>>
>>> extern inline size_t ustr_xi__pow2(int use_big, unsigned char len)
>>> {
>>> static const unsigned char map_big_pow2[4] = {2, 4, 8, 16};
>>> static const unsigned char
On 02/11/07 at 10:39 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Has anyone written a utility for automatically testing the interaction
> between maintainer and init.d scripts? To verify that, for instance,
> package purge works no matter what debconf variables are set, or
> whether or not the daemon is running
hello!
I'm writing my first debian package and I've a question:
what copyright must I write in the copyright debian/copyright?
the package copyright or the software to be packaged copyright?
thanks!
--
David Arroyo Menéndez
http://www.davidam.com
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "kernel-patch-tomoyo", alternative
secure patch like SELinux, apparmor and SMACK but it is more easy than
others.
* Package name: kernel-patch-tomoyo
ITP: 449043
Version: 1.5.1-20071019
Upstream Author: Tetsuo Handa
David Arroyo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/11/2007):
> the package copyright or the software to be packaged copyright?
The software (and its data/whatever)'s license in extenso (and all
additional copyright holders, license terms, etc.), and usually a
quick note about the packaging itself.
Cheers,
--
Hi Cyril,
* Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-04 03:24]:
> David Arroyo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/11/2007):
> > the package copyright or the software to be packaged copyright?
>
> The software (and its data/whatever)'s license in extenso (and all
> additional copyright holders, license te
Thanks!
2007/11/4, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Cyril,
> * Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-04 03:24]:
> > David Arroyo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/11/2007):
> > > the package copyright or the software to be packaged copyright?
> >
> > The software (and its data/whatever)'s licen
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-1
of my package "smc".
It builds these binary packages:
smc- a Jump and Run game like Super Mario World written in C++
smc-data - levels and music for smc
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix the
Dear mentors,
That's my second try to search for a sponsor for these 2 packages
(libdbi 0.8.2-1 and libdbi-drivers 0.8.2-1-1). They are lintian clean,
and the upstream "make check" is running ok.
Please don't drop this lib in Debian, it's available everywhere else,
and there is no reason that nob
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the new version (0.8.1-2) of the swftools
package.
The package is linda/lintian clean.
Here is the changelog:
swftools (0.8.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed the python-rfxswf dependencies (Closes: #427834)
* Changed the python-rfxswf to comply
14 matches
Mail list logo
