Re: rpath issue on 64 bit architectures

2007-12-05 Thread Anibal Avelar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org iD8DBQFHV2tSzur584O2RlYRAsxcAJ99AUmHrFROoSmXsBqvS1akSZAETACeNOu+ BDVWCCwVC38y6NYe48YEGvw= =qv4G -END PGP SIGNATURE- On 12/5/07, Leo costela

dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol ... found in none of the libraries

2007-12-05 Thread Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
The new dpkg-shlibdeps is giving me tons of messages of the form dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol ui_node_remove_node used by debian/liferea/usr/lib/liferea/libliscrlua.so found in none of the libraries The .so in question is a plugin meant to be dlopened by the main program. The symbols reporte

Re: rpath issue on 64 bit architectures

2007-12-05 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
Leo "costela" Antunes wrote: > > The way I see it the options for dealing with RPATH are: > - And, of course, using 'chrpath' on debian/rules Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: rpath issue on 64 bit architectures

2007-12-05 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
Russ Allbery wrote: > Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Il giorno 04/dic/07, alle ore 01:23, Russ Allbery ha scritto: > >>> The problem is that libtool doesn't think that lib64 is on the regular >>> library search path and hence decides that it needs to add rpath, which >>> is broken

Re: RFS: mcl

2007-12-05 Thread Philipp Benner
Hi Patrick, thanks for the review. > - In some files are useless newlines at the end of the file, please remove > them. > - Could you please clear unneeded comments out of the debian/rules? > - debian/dirs isn't needed. > - Please add the Homepage field to the control file. there is one already.

Re: RFS: mcl

2007-12-05 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Philipp Benner schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mcl". * Package name: mcl Version : 1:06-058-1 Upstream Author : Stijn van Dongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://micans.org/mcl/ * License : GPL-2 Section : math T

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

2007-12-05 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Felipe Sateler > > So I am not the only "dump" man among the professionels in this area. Good to > know ! Meanwhile I managed to load up my package. I suppose, someone will > check this now (or not) and I have to wait, if there will be feedback. it's more easy if you post a RFS template on th

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

2007-12-05 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 schrieb Leo "costela" Antunes: > Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > >> If you don't want to be the maintainer for the package, and instead only > >> want to have it packaged, you can file a RFP (request for package) bug > >> to the package 'wnpp'. > >> Simply using 'reportbug wn

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

2007-12-05 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > Yes, I gave up. I had the feeling, no one was interested in new packages > > at all, so I gave up. And yes, I had no fun and the package worked on my > > system > > The first steps in the mentoring process are us

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

2007-12-05 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Yes, I gave up. I had the feeling, no one was interested in new packages > at all, so I gave up. And yes, I had no fun and the package worked on my > system The first steps in the mentoring process are usually the most frustrating ones: you post questins and/or packag

Re: New package "unicornscan" (a new try !)

2007-12-05 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
> You need to use ftp, rather than scp to upload to mentors > here is my dupload.conf. I think the default must be ftp, because I > don't see anything here to force ftp. Here is my .dupload.conf > > package config; > > $cfg{'mentors'} = > { >fqdn => 'mentors.debian.net', >incoming

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

2007-12-05 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: >> If you don't want to be the maintainer for the package, and instead only >> want to have it packaged, you can file a RFP (request for package) bug >> to the package 'wnpp'. >> Simply using 'reportbug wnpp' and filling in the proper fields should be >> enough. It should gui

Re: New package "unicornscan" (a new try !)

2007-12-05 Thread David Bremner
Hans-J> dupload -t mentors unicornscan_0.4.7-1_amd64.changes Hans-J> Uploading (scp) to mentors.debian.net:~ You need to use ftp, rather than scp to upload to mentors here is my dupload.conf. I think the default must be ftp, because I don't see anything here to force ftp. Here is my

Re: New package "unicornscan" (a new try !)

2007-12-05 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 schrieb Leo "costela" Antunes: > Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > I suppose, this is all to difficult and complicated for me. As the > > package is new, I get MD5-errors and more. So, as this process is too > > difficult for me, and is taking to much of long time, I give up.

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

2007-12-05 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 schrieb Leo "costela" Antunes: > Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > I suppose, this is all to difficult and complicated for me. As the > > package is new, I get MD5-errors and more. So, as this process is too > > difficult for me, and is taking to much of long time, I give up.

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

2007-12-05 Thread Basile STARYNKEVITCH
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: I was just intend to take part in the community, but it seem not to work. And please: Do not write me, "read here", "read there", "read somewhere!", really, for some few questions, I am not willing to read hours lots of stuff. Too bad! reading all this stuff (which has

RFS: ccontrol (updated package)

2007-12-05 Thread Ted Percival
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.1+20071204-1 of my package "ccontrol". My previous sponsor (Amaya) is currently AFK. It builds this binary package: ccontrol - Compilation controller The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix bug 447832. The package can be

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

2007-12-05 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > I suppose, this is all to difficult and complicated for me. As the package is > new, I get MD5-errors and more. So, as this process is too difficult for me, > and is taking to much of long time, I give up. Sorry to hear that. > Sorry, I am not willing to collect all the

New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

2007-12-05 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Dear mentors, I suppose, this is all to difficult and complicated for me. As the package is new, I get MD5-errors and more. So, as this process is too difficult for me, and is taking to much of long time, I give up. Sorry, I am not willing to collect all the different docs and reaqd, this is b

Re: Ubuntu-to-Debian packaging

2007-12-05 Thread Cesare Tirabassi
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 04:27:28 C.J. Adams-Collier wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to respond Cesare, No problem at all. > I asked for your input not for your association with a particular group, > but because of your first-hand experience with the subject matter. OK, it would hav

Re: Need help with new package

2007-12-05 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 schrieb Y Giridhar Appaji Nag: > Hi Hans, > > On 07/12/05 12:53 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich said ... > > > if someone would take a look to the package, if I soemthing forgot. > > This is my very first try, so maybe there are mistakes. > > > > The package is called "unicorns

Re: Need help with new package

2007-12-05 Thread Y Giridhar Appaji Nag
Hi Hans, On 07/12/05 12:53 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich said ... > if someone would take a look to the package, if I soemthing forgot. > This is my very first try, so maybe there are mistakes. > > The package is called "unicornscan". You should upload the package to mentors.debian.net and post a link

Re: Need help with new package

2007-12-05 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I have just built a new package for amd64, the package built fine, > installation went fine and the package itself is running fine, too. > > The code is licensed under the GPL. > > Now I want to release the package for the community, but I woulod be pl

Need help with new package

2007-12-05 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Dear mentors, I have just built a new package for amd64, the package built fine, installation went fine and the package itself is running fine, too. The code is licensed under the GPL. Now I want to release the package for the community, but I woulod be pleased, if someone would take a look to

Re: Orphaned clanlib package

2007-12-05 Thread Jon Dowland
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 07:30:02PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > I'm sorry, but I'm interested to see trophy work :) It's > nice to see, that someone is realy working on this > package. But for fucking sake, he has to take the > ownership of the WNPP bug and have to rename it to ITP: > *... I've

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-geoip (updated package)

2007-12-05 Thread Michael Mende
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:49:17PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Michael Mende schrieb: > >Dear mentors, > > > >I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.0-1 > >of my package "libapache2-mod-geoip". > > > >It builds these binary packages: > >libapache2-mod-geoip - GeoIP support for apach

Re: communication, friendlyness, DDs (Re: Ubuntu-to-Debian packaging)

2007-12-05 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
Hi, On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 01:46:49AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > > > Really, it may have sounded more rude to you, then it was meant to be. > > > > > > But I was really annoyed by such a statement, > > > > > > That rather implies you wer