steps i followed
1> apt-get source
2> cd -
3> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
above steps builds deb pkg with shared library while using "apt-get -b
source " don't.
bye
varun
Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:11:31PM -0800, iluvlinux wrote:
>> i am trying to build p
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:49:22PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > The new package is at the same place as before. It shouldn't have any
> > problems now.
>
> I'll check it tonight.
Good work.
I've uploaded the package. You should receive confirmations for the
upload shortly.
Plea
Holger Levsen wrote:
>> The packaging is now explicitly using GPL3 and the path to that version
>> has been added.
>>
>
> Actually, as you are both upstream and maintainer, why dont you use the same
> licence for both? It's definitly less "risky"...
>
>
> regards,
> Holger (a bit in a h
Title: Documento sin título
CURSO CORRETAJEINMOBILIARIO
Es un curso que le enseñará todo lo necesario para que Ud. Pueda comprar, vender o alquilar una propiedad o trabajar como un Agente In
Hi,
I'd like to set conditions on variables in a make file to do:
ifndef $(APP_DIR)
APP_DIR=/usr/share
endif
This works on Debian, however on FreeBSD, it doesn't work, and I have to
write this:
.ifndef $(APP_DIR)
APP_DIR=/usr/share
.endif
Is there something that is compatible with both that I
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 20:10, JackTheDipper wrote:
> The packaging is now explicitly using GPL3 and the path to that version
> has been added.
Actually, as you are both upstream and maintainer, why dont you use the same
licence for both? It's definitly less "risky"...
regards,
Hi! Thank you very much for your reply!
Holger Levsen wrote:
> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gnomecc/gnome-color-chooser-0.2.3.tar.gz?modtime=1196203255&big_mirror=0
>
> and
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-color-chooser/gnome-color-chooser_0.2.3.orig.tar.gz
>
> differ
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:19:05 -0600, Erick Vresnev Castellanos Hernández <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, I'm trying to package Ember[1], but in the way I found some
> dependencies for files like:
> tolua++.h
> CEGUILua.h
> When searching for those files in the Debian Package Contents Search
> (D
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:21:23PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
>
> On mar, 2007-12-11 at 08:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > (BTW. Always use the lintian from unstable to check your packages.)
>
> I do. I've just updated lintian but it won't give me those errors even
> with
On 11/12/2007, Erick Vresnev Castellanos Hernández wrote:
> When searching for those files in the Debian Package Contents Search
> (DPCS) at [2], for both entries the result was libcegui-mk2-dev
> package.
JFTR: Not found when using apt-file (update, then search).
> So I looked into the package p
On mar, 2007-12-11 at 08:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> Mmm. cdbs at work.
>
> Ok, if you can't get them to apply soon enough, it's ok to leave those
> (but just those) directly in the .diff.gz.
As I explain in my response to Neil, there shouldn't be any non-debian/
parts in the
Hi,
I'm trying to package Ember[1], but in the way I found some dependencies
for files like:
tolua++.h
CEGUILua.h
When searching for those files in the Debian Package Contents Search
(DPCS) at [2], for both entries the result was libcegui-mk2-dev package.
I continue to install the mentioned pac
Hi Werner,
On Thursday 06 December 2007 16:56, JackTheDipper wrote:
> any comments or the redemptive upload would be great ;-)
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gnomecc/gnome-color-chooser-0.2.3.tar.gz?modtime=1196203255&big_mirror=0
and
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-color-
Ming Hua wrote:
Scim package is already set up to handle all_ALL, it just doesn't set it
to default (and it shouldn't). I believe no packages that currently use
im-switch change all_ALL by default.
Can you explain what you mean by scim being set up to handle all_ALL? On
all the Debian and Ubunt
On mar, 2007-12-11 at 15:43 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:52:17 -0600
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 07:29:39PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
>
> > > I think the reason Makefile.{am,in} are patched directly is bec
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:52:17 -0600
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 07:29:39PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> > I think the reason Makefile.{am,in} are patched directly is because the
> > patches are applied too late in the process and by then
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 07:29:39PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
>
> On lun, 2007-12-10 at 11:35 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> > >
> > > On dom, 2007-12-09 at 16:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xulrunner-l10n".
I'll take care of this, you'll get an email from me this evening.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panther
Hi,
IANADD so I cannot sponsor your upload, but anyways some comments.
First of all:
You really should include the URL to the .dsc file of your package.
That way you make it a lot of easier for potential sponsors to find your
package and you higher the chances that a potential sponsor will have a
19 matches
Mail list logo
