Re: libdbi Debian packages

Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have received this from my upstream. > > Should I consider adding a /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libdbd.conf ? I would say no. Usually this is covering up some other problem. If the libraries in /usr/lib/dbd should be in the system library search path, why ar

libdbi Debian packages

Hi, I have received this from my upstream. Should I consider adding a /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libdbd.conf ? Thomas Original Message Subject: libdbi Debian packages Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:19:23 +0100 From: Markus Hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Thomas, I've

test

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: blimp

Hi. On 05/01/2008, Knut Arild Erstad wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "blimp". Blimp is a photo > editor which offers a unique workflow for photographers. Some of the > features are: I would understand if you were asking for a review instead of a sponsor because… > The packag

Re: iolanguage packaging

Bernhard R. Link wrote: - for a small amount of files I'd say it is normaly safe to ignore it (though that does not seem to be the case here) Unfortunately not, it's more than 6 megs of data. - put parts with architecture-independent data to /usr/share and symlink them. That is wha

Re: RFS: wicrawl

Wow that's quite a list. I'll have a shot at it, don't know if I'm up to handling some of those problems. I didn't realise how much work this package would need. Thanks for the help, David Newgas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

RFS: blimp

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "blimp". Blimp is a photo editor which offers a unique workflow for photographers. Some of the features are: * Support for many (if not all) camera raw formats through dcraw. * Full support for 16-bit color depth per channel (48-bit RGB de

Re: iolanguage packaging

Richard Laager wrote: 1. Some addons' shared libraries have dependencies to other addons. Do you have an example here?It seems like this is violating the addon abstraction, though I know nothing about this programming language. For example, I don't think I've ever seen a Perl or Python

Re: iolanguage packaging

I'm not a Debian developer, so take this all with a large grain of salt. On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 15:03 +0100, Jonas Eschenburg wrote: >1. Some addons' shared libraries have dependencies to other addons. Do you have an example here? It seems like this is violating the addon abstraction, though I

Re: iolanguage packaging

* Jonas Eschenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080105 15:03]: > 2. Flux, an OpenGL-based GUI addon, contains a lot of image and font > resources. Those, of course, end up in /usr/lib and produce > lintian warnings such as "image-file-in-usr-lib". What am I > supposed to do about it? The d

Re: RFS: wicrawl

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 23:25 +, David Newgas wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 13:14 +, Neil Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:46:11 + > > David Newgas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1. I cannot check your GnuPG signature on the .dsc because you do not appear to have sent your public

iolanguage packaging

Dear mentors, I am currently working (together with Danya Alexeyevsky) on Debian packages for a nice little programming language called Io (, ITP #454970). [*] This is the first set of packages which I intend to officially add to Debian. As it is also a rather big