Re: Using symbols files

On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 12:50 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:44:32AM +, Neil Williams wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 09:35 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 06:56:18PM +, Neil Williams wrote: > > Instead, the maintainer needs to work with

Re: Using symbols files

On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:28:46AM +, Neil Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 12:50 +, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:44:32AM +, Neil Williams wrote: > > Right, as you say the problems here are nothing to do with symbols > > files or symbol versioning. A poorly

RFS: mscore -- Full featured WYSIWYG score editor

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mscore", as detailed in the ITP at [0], which would of course be closed by any upload. * Package name: mscore Version : 0.8.0 Upstream Author : Werner Schweer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://mscore.sourceforge

Re: RFS: inkblot

Uploaded new version. It's based on the one that actually made it into the Ubuntu archive, so some of the comments have been addressed when passing REVU. Some comments: - CDBS is now used and debian/rules is very simple, so the comments about dh_make comments, configure call, DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE

Re: Using symbols files

Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure zlib is a good example - when I built the current sources > (which contained the symbols file), I got a lot of lintian warnings > about the symbols. The zlib symbol file warnings are because the current versioning wouldn't work well with ba

RFS: libsetproctitle

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsetproctitle". * Package name: libsetproctitle Version : 0.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Dmitry V. Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sisyphus.ru/srpm/Sisyphus/setproctitle/get * License : LGPL/BSD-sty

Re: RFS: libsetproctitle

On 16/01/2008, Max Lapan wrote: > It builds these binary packages: > libsetproctitle0 - A setproctitle implementation > libsetproctitle0-dev - A setproctitle implementation development files Do you think you'll have to manage libsetproctitleX-dev and libsetproctitleY-dev at the very same time? If

RFS: gitstats: statistics generator for git repositories

Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package 'gitstats'. Package name : gitstats Version : 0.0~git-20080116 Upstream author : Heikki Hokkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://gitstats.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL v2 Programmi

Re: RFS: libsetproctitle

On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:11:36AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 16/01/2008, Max Lapan wrote: > > It builds these binary packages: > > libsetproctitle0 - A setproctitle implementation > > libsetproctitle0-dev - A setproctitle implementation development files > > Do you think you'll have to ma

Re: RFS: gitstats: statistics generator for git repositories

On 16/01/2008, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > The package can be found at http://43-1.org/~ansgar/gitstats/. > > This is my first package, any feedback is welcome. Please install lintian (and make sure it is the latest version), and run it against both source and binary packages. Some work to do befor

RFS: pydict (Updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pydict". * Package name: pydict Version : 0.2.5.1-3.2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : text It bu

Re: RFS: falcon package (ITP:Bug#460591); source package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cyril Brulebois wrote: I have been able to create a package that should be much more Debian compliant. The package (containing the canonical source Debian package files) is in the same place as before: http://www.falconpl.org/downloads/0.8.7/falcon-0