Hi,
I've updated the package according to my previous answers,
with additional decisions for some points:
On Feb 5, 2008 5:21 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your shlibs says = 0.1.7 but the max version in your symbols file is 0.1.6.
The shlibdeps was bumped to 0.1.7
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. I'll have a look at these, hopefully today. If
anyone is faster, don't wait for me, though. ;-)
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:04:39PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.4.1-1
of my package qterm.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at
Hi,
I'm wondering how to use CFLAGS properly debian/rules. I guess it
really is a newbie question...
I read http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html . dh-
make currently does show how to set CFLAGS, but not how to pass it on.
In one of my packages, I do that (basically):
On Feb 5, 2008 9:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
blurbs-missing-in-licence
Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug.
Please revert that, sorry for the noise.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Feb 5, 2008 7:21 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's to be changed, I'd rather bump the versions in the
symbols file to 0.1.7 and ignore etch completely. Would
there be any drawback in doing so?
Sounds fine given the private symbols stuff.
For the standard This
On Feb 5, 2008 9:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
blurbs-missing-in-licence
Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug.
Please revert that, sorry for the noise.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Feb 6, 2008 6:07 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 7:21 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find this guideline for library description good, although
I don't see an example of such package yet.
warzone2100/warzone2100-data is one example of such
On Feb 6, 2008 6:27 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 9:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
blurbs-missing-in-licence
Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug.
Please revert that, sorry for the noise.
Done and uploaded:
On Feb 6, 2008 8:30 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
warzone2100/warzone2100-data is one example of such a pair of descriptions.
Thanks. I hope my similar modification is fine.
Yep, it is.
So, I'll upload once you remove the licence blurb I wrongly asked you to
On 06/02/2008, Paul Wise wrote:
Well, I just checked the Vcs-* links, they seem to point to upstream
rather than the Debian packaging. They also have a debian dir in
them that doesn't seem to be updated.
For the record, some reasons for asking upstream not to include a
debian/ directory in the
On Feb 6, 2008 4:15 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got another idea to solve this: just drop babel.sty from
thailatex, and copy it from texlive-latex-base with edition
on postinst. Also remove it on prerm.
Done, and updated with version unchanged:
On Feb 6, 2008 8:41 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done and uploaded:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swath/swath_0.3.2-1.dsc
Uploaded, please contact this list for future uploads.
Other changes left?
For next time:
Well, I just checked the Vcs-*
On Feb 6, 2008 8:28 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uploaded.
Thanks a lot.
BTW, something I missed until now, are you sure the libthai0 -
libthai-data is OK to leave unversioned?
Yes. The dictionary is independent part from the algorithm.
It will have versioned dependency if the
On Feb 6, 2008 9:20 PM, Cyril Brulebois
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the record, some reasons for asking upstream not to include a
debian/ directory in the released tarballs:
http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/on_debian_directories_in_upstream_tarballs/
It's not included. For swath,
On Feb 6, 2008 9:23 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not so sure if this is OK, what do the texlive Debian people say?
The change in the postinst looks fairly simple, perhaps it could be
integrated into texlive?
Again, I think that would cause kind of dangling pointer, and
would
On Feb 6, 2008 9:10 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uploaded, please contact this list for future uploads.
Thank you.
For next time:
Well, I just checked the Vcs-* links, they seem to point to upstream
rather than the Debian packaging. They also have a debian dir in them
that
On 06/02/2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
OK. Specifying a fixed subject.
And uploaded.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpH9PcddM6mO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the
following statements:
--
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
On 06/02/2008, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
software must display the following acknowledgement:
This product includes software developed at the University of
Tennessee, Knoxville, Innovative Computing Laboratories.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package zerofree.
Note that I have set the Dm-Upload-Allowed field. This package is
unrelated to the work I usually do with my sponsor Christoph Haas,
which is why I prefer to ask here rather than to him.
* Package name: zerofree
Hi Jean!
You wrote:
I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the
following statements:
--
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
This one time, at band camp, Cyril Brulebois said:
On 06/02/2008, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
software must display the following acknowledgement:
This product includes software developed at the University of
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 16:30 schrieb Jean Parpaillon:
Hi,
I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the
following statements:
--
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the
On 06/02/2008, Sebastian Harl wrote:
Just to make this clear […]
Yep, thank you (all) for clarifying that, sorry for the inconvenience.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpyGch4L5nAE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:46:23PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 06/02/2008, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
software must display the following acknowledgement:
This product includes software developed at the
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:25:15PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package zerofree.
I have several other packages waiting for me at the moment, so I'm
afraid I can't do that (at least not soon).
Note that I have set the Dm-Upload-Allowed field. This
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.99-2+ds1 of the package
libx86, which I want to adopt.
It builds these binary packages:
libx86-1 - x86 real-mode library
libx86-dbg - x86 real-mode library - debugging symbols
libx86-dev - x86 real-mode library - development files
Le 6 févr. 08 à 19:47, Bas Wijnen a écrit :
Note that I have set the Dm-Upload-Allowed field. This package is
unrelated to the work I usually do with my sponsor Christoph Haas,
which
is why I prefer to ask here rather than to him.
In that case, I think it is not appropriate to set the
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:46:31PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 16:30 schrieb Jean Parpaillon:
Hi,
I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the
following statements:
--
1. Redistributions of source code must
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package smplayer-themes.
* Package name : smplayer-themes
* Version : 0.1.15-1
* Upstream Author : Ricardo Villalba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://smplayer.sourceforge.net
* License : aggregation of independent
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.5-5
of my package acon.
It builds these binary packages:
acon - Text console arabization
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 464271
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
-
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Zerofree finds the unallocated, non-zeroed blocks in an ext2 or ext3
file-system and fills them with zeroes. This is useful if the device on
How does zerofree avoid race conditions of something trying to use a block
it wil zero in the time window
Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:01PM +0100, Jean Parpaillon a écrit :
3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
software must display the following acknowledgement:
This product
Hello,
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008, Barry deFreese wrote:
I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
someone has time to review/sponsor.
Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2008-02-05, Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This example is maybe a bit artificial, but the point is that with such
licences in main, redistributors who use advertisement should in theory
read all the copyright files to check who to acknowledge. For this
reason, I wouldn't recommend to include
Hello,
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.99-2+ds1 of the package
libx86, which I want to adopt.
Thanks for this work. This package is quite important for people with
laptops!
Some remarks:
1. The Ubuntu package seems to have
Hi
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:04:08 +0900
Hideki Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package failmalloc.
* Package name: failmalloc
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Yoshinori K. Okuji mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:44:38PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This example is maybe a bit artificial, but the point is that with such
licences in main, redistributors who use advertisement should in theory
read all the copyright files to check
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that it is a bit frivolous to distribute software with
advertisment clause in main and not properly warning the redistributors,
who are the most likely persons to infringe the clause. We should
remeber that for other aspects of licencing and
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think it's horribly credible that including software covered
by the 4-clause BSD license in Debian violates the principle of
least surprise when we specifically list it as one of our acceptable
licenses in the DFSG.
The 4-clause BSD license is
On Feb 4, 2008 7:45 PM, Kartik Mistry wrote:
My regular sponsors are busy at moment, so if anyone can help to
upload following package (or can comment on them for better quality) I
will be very thankful.
Hi all,
I am still looking for sponsor(s) for following packages! The long
list has
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 4-clause BSD license is not one that we list as an acceptable
license.
DFSG URL:http://www.debian.org/social_contract §10:
10. Example Licenses
The GPL, BSD, and Artistic licenses are examples of licenses that
we consider free.
Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:27:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
Am I missing something?
This ?
http://web.archive.org/web/19990210065944/http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
http://web.archive.org/web/20001205083200/http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
--
Charles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Il giorno Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:18:44 +0530
Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Hello,
Hi,
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.99-2+ds1 of the package
libx86, which I want to adopt.
Thanks for this work. This package is
44 matches
Mail list logo
