Re: tcltls & possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl

2008-04-19 Thread Muammar El Khatib
Hi Russ, Russ Allbery wrote: > > If you add the exception from upstream to the copyright file and it uses > one of the standard wordings that talks about an exception or exemption, > lintian will figure it out for itself without needing an override. > I will take care of it to avoid the use of

Re: tcltls & possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl

2008-04-19 Thread Muammar El Khatib
Hi Vincent, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du samedi 19 avril 2008, vers 20:35, > > You cannot just add yourself the exception in debian/copyright. You > should ask upstream about this issue and tell him to add the exception > which allows to link OpenSSL to h

Please reply to confirm(1208651002.2300_47320.lfmail) message and allow delivery

2008-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Friends system)
Message From Me Please read this carefully. To Get Around my new SPAM FILTER...please just REPLY without changing the subject. Here is the default message that my AntiSpam server puts out: Your email to "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the subject "All tabIets you possib

Re: RFS: alien-arena and alien-arena-data (updated packages)

2008-04-19 Thread Andres Mejia
On Saturday 19 April 2008 5:25:31 pm Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 04:35:08PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I'm looking for a sponsor for the updated packages of alien-arena (an > > online first person shooter) and alien-arena-data (holds the binary > > indep

Re: buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:28:14AM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > So again: [EMAIL PROTECTED], please for the sake of users of > (at least) sparc, ia64, i386 -- auto build the package libcwd. Now done. > If there is a problem and this cannot be done - MAIL me

RFS: alien-arena and alien-arena-data (updated packages)

2008-04-19 Thread Andres Mejia
Hello all, I'm looking for a sponsor for the updated packages of alien-arena (an online first person shooter) and alien-arena-data (holds the binary independent files needed for alien-arena). All packages built would be: alien-arena - the game client alien-arena-browser - browser to search for

Re: tcltls & possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl

2008-04-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When upstream fixes this copyright issue, you need to add a lintian > override as stated in the warning. A lintian override is a file that you > install in /usr/share/lintian/overrides/tcltls and that contains: > > tcltls: possible-gpl-code-linked-

Re: buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PS It might be that I'm "impatient", I only mailed them recently. >Then that is my fault (probably because I'm myself a very >fast response time guy; I read and answer mails many times >per day, seven days per week, every day (I haven't had a ho

Re: tcltls & possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl

2008-04-19 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du samedi 19 avril 2008, vers 20:35, Muammar El Khatib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am maintaining tcltls, and now I have to upload a new version. When I ran > lintian -iI I got this: > W: tcltls: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl > N: > N: This packag

tcltls & possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl

2008-04-19 Thread Muammar El Khatib
Hi *, I am maintaining tcltls, and now I have to upload a new version. When I ran lintian -iI I got this: W: tcltls: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl N: N: This package appears to be covered by the GNU GPL but depends on the N: OpenSSL libssl package and does not mention a license exempt

Re: buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 19 avril 2008, vers 18:02, Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > PS It might be that I'm "impatient", I only mailed them recently. >Then that is my fault (probably because I'm myself a very >fast response time guy; I read and answer mails ma

Re: buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Carlo Wood
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:28:14AM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > If you sent a request to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, requesting the > autobuild on the non-free buildd network, that should be enough. As long > as your justification for why it is legal to let it be autobuilt is > acceptable. I already

Re: buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Carlo Segre
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Neil McGovern wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.devel.mentors/browse_thread/thread/b0fc0de21553819f Actually that thread is a bit different since it is about building contrib packages when they require non-free dependencies. The post that relates to g

Re: buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Carlo Segre
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Carlo Wood wrote: I mailed about this before here. I was pointed to an old archived post that seemed to be the only data on how to do to get non-free to autobuild anyway (because there is no legal issue). I did what it said - and it's still not autobuilding. Why not? Sorry,

Re: buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Paul Wise
There is a simpler way this could be fixed: Pick a clearly-DFSG licence (GPL/BSD/etc) and just upload to main. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 04:30:35PM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:50:52PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > > libcwd is in non-free and non-free is not auto-built due to possible > > legal issue. > > > > The package is in the archive for amd64 because it was uploaded built > > on

Re: buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Carlo Wood
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:50:52PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > libcwd is in non-free and non-free is not auto-built due to possible > legal issue. > > The package is in the archive for amd64 because it was uploaded built > on amd64. I mailed about this before here. I was pointed to an old archiv

Re: buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:39:24PM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote: > Hi, I thought I did whatever needed to be done to > get buildd to build libcwd, but nothing has happened > so far... > > Can someone check why buildd is still not building > libcwd? There is a version for amd64 (and frankly > I have no

buildd is not building my package.

2008-04-19 Thread Carlo Wood
Hi, I thought I did whatever needed to be done to get buildd to build libcwd, but nothing has happened so far... Can someone check why buildd is still not building libcwd? There is a version for amd64 (and frankly I have no idea why THAT architecture and not another) but that is it. -- Carlo Woo

Re: RFS: xiterm+thai (updated package)

2008-04-19 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks like this in the upstream makefile: > > > > all allbin alldoc tags clean: > > @for I in ${subdirs}; do (cd $$I; ${M

Re: feedback on jcc package, please

2008-04-19 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 18:05 -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > Could I please get some feedback on the package "jcc" ? This is my first > time using cdbs. It might be an idea to say something about the package so that sponsors have some idea. This is a python package and I have no idea how to check