On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 6:15 PM, nico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is now the procedure to upload package on mentors.debian.net? (it's
only data packages, there is no .changes or .dsc files)
Currently there needs to be a source package to create the .deb from,
so you'll need to create an
Hello Mentors,
I am not sure whether this is the right place to ask this. I reported
a bug http://bugs.debian.org/480536 related to a new upstream release
package upgrade sometime back. I have also attached the diff and new
orig to the bug report. It would be nice if some mentor, reviews the
Hi Vincent!
I have re-uploaded the package with the changes mentioned below.
Thanks a lot for the time you took to review the package.
Package link:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/irsim
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, add an
On Saturday 24 May 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:46:59PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
Done, and re-uploaded to mentors.d.o
Hey, is there any chance someone could take another look at this please?
Hey Noah,
I'd rather reply with few questions ;-) -- it seems that the
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 01:53:33PM +0800, Vern Sun wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package vidalia.
Hi Vern,
I’m not a DD, some comments nonetheless.
* Package name: vidalia
Version : 0.1.2-2~b2
Upstream Author : Matt Edman [EMAIL PROTECTED], Justin Hipple [EMAIL
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has to be a new low for debian-mentors. Sigh.
So was this, please be a bit less abrasive towards potential contributors.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 12:54 +0530, Aanjhan R wrote:
Hello Mentors,
You appear to be using Hardy and filing to the Debian BTS - the version
reported in the BTS does not exist in Debian (fixed). Hardy has now been
released, I have no idea whether any new version will be available to
Hardy users (I
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Aanjhan R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure whether this is the right place to ask this. I reported
a bug http://bugs.debian.org/480536 related to a new upstream release
package upgrade sometime back. I have also attached the diff and new
orig to the bug
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Aanjhan R wrote:
Hi Neil!
Hi,
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian has systems that alert the maintainer to new releases, so Ernesto
will have had a reminder already from DEHS. Not every upstream release
needs a Package the
Hi Neil!
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian has systems that alert the maintainer to new releases, so Ernesto
will have had a reminder already from DEHS. Not every upstream release
needs a Package the new version bug report.
Why not if it contains
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 11:57 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Aanjhan R wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian has systems that alert the maintainer to new releases, so Ernesto
will have had a reminder already from DEHS. Not
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 14:05 +0530, Aanjhan R wrote:
Hi Neil!
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian has systems that alert the maintainer to new releases, so Ernesto
will have had a reminder already from DEHS. Not every upstream release
needs a
OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du dimanche 25 mai 2008, vers 09:12,
Aanjhan R [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Despite COPYRIGHT file at the root of the source code, this software
seems not licensed under GPL... It would be better if upstream included
a clearer statement about the
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to detail the improvements in the new release, or at least
link to the upstream page that details the improvements, in the bug
report itself. Wherever possible, the improvements that are specific or
especially
OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers
15:53, Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package uvccapture.
* Package name: uvccapture
Version : 0.4-1
Upstream Author : Gabriel A. Devenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du mardi 20 mai 2008, vers 20:55, أحمد
المحمودي [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0~a11.dfsg.1-1
of my package tkgate.
Hi Ahmed!
What about bug #474496? Is it fixed?
It builds these binary packages:
tkgate -
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
--cut--
Why not if it contains couple of important bugfixes?
Here I disagree with Neil. While DEHS will detect it, having upstream
visiting Debian BTS and emphasizing on new features/bugfixes is a good
thing!
Actually, I think we agree - the
Vern Sun wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package vidalia.
I'm interested in sponsoring this.
I agree with the comments from Michael Schutte, you need to fix those and
then I'll take a look.
regards,
Colin
--
Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1903 236872 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id
Debian
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:03:21PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:2.5.0~alpha3-2
of my package moc.
[...]
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Uploaded.
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL
on 日, 2008-05-25 at 15:57 +0800, Michael Schutte wrote:
I’m not a DD, some comments nonetheless.
Thank you for your reply.
* Put vidalia into the net section.
* Upstream’s repo has changed URL, Updated Vcs-* field.
* Move Homepage up to Sources stanza.
* Indicate why you close #405431 in
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 12:43:19PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
What about bug #474496? Is it fixed?
Yes it is indeed. I will put that in the changelog.
Is the fact that tkgate is using Tcl/Tk important enough to be included
in the short description? For an end-user software, this is usually
Hi *,
I am preparing a package for Yabause[1] and wondering what will be the
best practice for me.
Yabause has two frontends, one Qt and one Gtk. I would like to ship
both. Is there any recipe for debian/rules how to create two identical
packages but with one configure option changed?
Vern Sun wrote:
That's great. Updated from version 1.0.2-2~b2 to 1.0.2-2.
I've had a look and it mostly looks good.
However, as Ansgar said, you have misused the Vcs-* field.
Also, your debian/changelog has all of the upstream changelog in it. This is
incorrect, debian/changelog is the
Hi,
Vern Sun wrote:
* Upstream’s repo has changed URL, Updated Vcs-* field.
The Vcs-* fields should point to the repository used for the Debian
packaging work, not to upstream's repository (unless they happen to be
identical of course).
Regards,
Ansgar
--
PGP: 1024D/595FAD19 739E 2D09 0969
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:1.1.0-1
of my package gnurobots.
It builds these binary packages:
gnurobots - Program a robot to explore a world
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 374125 (ITA)
Changelog:
* New upstream
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
--cut--
Hello,
Finally, this is the first ever Debian package for vidalia so it should
have a Debian version of -1.
I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. 1) you kill history 2) even not
being officially published, this source package is in
On Sun, 25 May 2008 17:17:04 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. [..] 2) even
not being officially published, this source package is in the wild and it is
a bad idea to just reset its versioning (well unless using epoch which would
be compeltely
George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
Finally, this is the first ever Debian package for vidalia so it should
have a Debian version of -1.
I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. 1) you kill history 2) even not
being officially published,
Please go and
Hi, Evgeni...
On Sonntag, 25. Mai 2008, Evgeni Golov wrote:
I am preparing a package for Yabause[1] and wondering what will be the
best practice for me.
Yabause has two frontends, one Qt and one Gtk. I would like to ship
both. Is there any recipe for debian/rules how to create two identical
On Sunday 25 May 2008, David Paleino wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2008 17:17:04 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. [..] 2) even
not being officially published, this source package is in the wild and it
is a bad idea to just reset its versioning (well unless
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
Finally, this is the first ever Debian package for vidalia so it should
have a Debian version of -1.
I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. 1) you kill history 2) even
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 04:44:04PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
The user probably doesn't want to use yabause-gtk to start the program.
So I think they should conflict. Or you just decide on either library to
build the package and are done.
What about using update-alternatives?
Sven
--
If
Le Sunday 25 May 2008 17:04:32 George Danchev, vous avez écrit :
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
Finally, this is the first ever Debian package for vidalia so it
should have a Debian version of -1.
I
Frank S. Thomas wrote:
# Retrieve all build logs of the package hello.
$ getbuildlog.sh hello
# Retrieve mips and mipsel build logs of hello 2.2-{1,2}.
$ getbuildlog.sh hello '2\.2-.' 'mips(|el)'
Do you think this script would be a useful addition for devscripts?
Better ask at
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages swac-get and swac-explore.
(I wrote about them in my mail swac-tools - software for Audio Collections of
Words)
Swac-get:
=
* Package name: swac-get
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of
on 日, 2008-05-25 at 21:21 +0800, Colin Tuckley wrote:
However, as Ansgar said, you have misused the Vcs-* field.
Removed
I'm also getting the following lintian warning:
W: vidalia: postinst-does-not-load-confmodule
N:
N: Even if your postinst does not involve debconf, you currently need
Hi,
Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I updated the glest and glest-data packages to the latest upstream
release (3.1.2).
So far there has been no response. Anybody cares to take a look at the
updated package?
Regards,
Ansgar
The packages can be found on mentors.debian.net:
Vern Sun wrote:
The package can be found at:
- dget
http://people.openrays.org/~s5unty/debian/vidalia/0.1.2-1/vidalia_0.1.2-1.dsc
The packaging is now good!
However, vidalia doesn't work very nicely with the Debian package for Tor.
Are you aware of and have you read Item 6 of:
nico wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages swac-get and swac-explore.
(I wrote about them in my mail swac-tools - software for Audio
Collections of Words)
Swac-get:
=
* Package name: swac-get
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : [fill in
Dear mentors,
I'm sorry. I was so tired that i haven't seen that I had to fill the
blank...
Swac-get:
=
* Package name: swac-get
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Nicolas Vion
* URL : http://shtooka.net/soft/swac_tools/en/
* License : GPL v3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package daptup.
* Package name: daptup
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Eugene V. Lyubimkin
* URL : http://sf.net/projects/daptup
* License : GPLv3
Section
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filed ITP bug, closed it recent upload.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/daptup
- - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- -
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du dimanche 25 mai 2008, vers
14:22, أحمد المحمودي [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Is the fact that tkgate is using Tcl/Tk important enough to be included
in the short description? For an end-user software, this is usually not
the case: don't say that a
Neil Williams wrote:
Just re-reading what you said:
...
CC=cc
endif
That will cause troubles when using CC=gcc-4.3 dpkg-buildpackage (for
example in i386, where 4.3 is not the default gcc).
Something like CC=$(CC) should be used (the intention is to preserve the
original $(CC), but of
Noah Slater wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 10:54:56AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Please upload your key to a public keyserver.
Very strange, my key has been uploaded for months.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ $ gpg --recv-key 0x8FBFCFBF
gpg: requesting key 8FBFCFBF from hkp server
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 16:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
Just re-reading what you said:
ifneq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE))
CC=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-gcc
else
CC=cc
endif
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) lockrun.c -o lockrun
...
CC=cc
endif
That will cause
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 05:32 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 25/05/2008, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
The upload would fix these bugs: 443934
Reported by: Diego Escalante Urrelo [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Date: Tue, 25 Sep
2007 02:36:04 UTC.
Although I read:
Feel free to take over,
Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 16:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
$(OURCC) $(CFLAGS) lockrun.c -o lockrun
OUR is the wrong prefix, CROSSCC is probably better.
The thing is that it is not always used for cross compiling, so I don't
think CROSSCC is the best name either.
Hi,
I've fixed an RC bug of rapidsvn, only a missing build-dep on
libmysqlclient15-dev.
This is the only change I've made.
I hope that this 2 cents in solving RC-bugs are made in the right
way... :)
Cheers,
francesco
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
daptup - see changes in new upgradeable lists after aptitude update
That sounds like something that should be in aptitude and maybe
enabled by a configuration item. aptitude
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.06-5
of my package vfu.
It builds these binary packages:
vfu- A versatile text-based filemanager
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 470597, 470615
The package can be found on
Dear mentors,
Some days ago I filed and ITP on the orphaned package gerris [1], and
then I found I depends on the also orphaned gts [2], so I filed an ITP
for this too.
[1] http://gfs.sourceforge.net/
[2] http://gts.sourceforge.net/
I need *lots* of help here...
This two packages come from
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20071029-2
of the package libspiro which I'm adopting.
It builds these binary packages:
libspiro-dev - a library for curve design (development files)
libspiro0 - a library for curve design
The package appears to be lintian clean.
53 matches
Mail list logo
