Re: upstream has license which is an edited GPL

oops, the link to ITP forgotten: [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493593 -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

upstream has license which is an edited GPL

Hello, I was going to package CDDE [1] but noticed that upstream ships it with a license file which is GPL v.2 without the preamble and the appendix so it starts from GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION end ends with

Re: RFS: sqlline

Hi I have two comments on this package. 1) Please consider to name the package sqlline-java or similar. Not strictly necessary but it do not clutter the namespace as much. :) 2) Do not strip the .orig.tar.gz file unless strictly necessary. In this case I can not see that it is necessary. It

Re: RFS: daptup (new package, 3rd try)

"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It builds these binary packages: > daptup - see changes in new & upgradeable lists after aptitude update The package synopsis should be an appositive clause as described in http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices#

Re: RFS: gtkmm-utils

"Iulian Udrea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It builds these binary packages: > libglibmm-utils-dev - utility functions, classes and widgets written on top > of glibmm > libglibmm-utils2 - utility functions, classes and widgets written on top of > glibmm > libgtkmm-utils-dev - utility functions, c

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 03 August 2008 02:43:24 Ben Finney wrote: > > Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > So, Please put those cahnges in a series of patches in > > > debian/patches and build depend on quilt. > > > > Or use some other method (e.

Re: RFS: bluemindo

OoO Pendant le repas du dimanche 03 août 2008, vers 19:58, Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : >> I've added how to disable patches in README.source >> It seems to be the only way with simple-patchsys. > Uarg. Another reason not to like CDBS, but apart from this, this seems > to

Re: RFS: sqlline

Le Saturday 02 August 2008 01:54:23 Damien Raude-Morvan, vous avez écrit : > Le Saturday 02 August 2008 00:40:41 Matthew Johnson, vous avez écrit : > > I've also had a look at sqlline: > > > > - if (as README.Debian suggests) it is only useful with a jdbc driver > > it should probably depend (or

Re: RFS: pal (done)

On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 06:11:48PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.3-1 of my package "pal". I just found a sponsor, thanks! Carsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

Hey, sorry for beeing late with replying. Had been a bit busy the days when we where on this, and forgotten it over this. Mea culpa, but just as a hint for the future: Its not bad to send a reminder after some days. After all people in the project are just people, so things like this may happen ot

Re: RFS: bzr-cvsps-import

Hi Vincent, Am Sonntag, den 03.08.2008, 11:17 +0200 schrieb Vincent Bernat: > OoO Pendant le repas du mercredi 16 juillet 2008, vers 19:22, Jelmer > Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bzr-cvsps-import". > You can try to seek sponsorship insi

RFS: daptup (new package, 3rd try)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "daptup". * Package name: daptup Version : 0.4-1 Upstream Author : Eugene V. Lyubimkin * URL : http://sf.net/projects/daptup * License : GPLv3 Section : admin It builds these binary packages: da

Re: RFS : Mina

Hi, Le Saturday 02 August 2008 14:09:03 Matthew Johnson, vous avez écrit : > On Sat Aug 02 01:30, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > > - changelog: since it's not been uploaded to Debian yet, can you > > > combine the changelog entries into just one. Pretty much changelog > > > entries should corre

RFS: pal (updated package - new upstream bugfix release)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.3-1 of my package "pal". It builds these binary packages: pal- command-line calendar program that can keep track of events The package is lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: #492464 Changes: pal (0.4.3-1) uns

RFS: gtkmm-utils

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkmm-utils". gtkmm-utils is a C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm. Package name: gtkmm-utils Version: 0.3.2-1 Upstream Authors: Marko Anastasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Dodji Seketeli <[EMAI

Re: RFS: dagger

On Sun, 27. Jul 2008, Stephan Windmüller wrote: > > Putting any of the information which could be effectively described using > > tags in the short or long description is completely redundant, and as such > > should be avoided. > Okay, I updated the package once again: 0.3.2-3 In the last w

Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)

Hi Vincent, On 08/07/26 15:01 +0200, Vincent Bernat said ... > As noted Alexander, this one fails to build from source : > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "setup.py", line 22, in > from tests.common import TEST_DIR, TEST_DATA_DIR > File "tests/common.py", line 17, in > f

Re: RFS: salasaga

Vincent Bernat wrote: salasaga_keycapture is not shipped any more. Is it intentional? > Yes, we already ship salasaga_screencapture and keycapture is for taking screenshots using Control and Print Screen. -- Iulian

Re: RFS: protobuf

On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 11:52:05AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du dimanche 03 août 2008, vers > 11:37, Iustin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > > > I didn't know if you prefer re-upload with the same version or not, so I > > increased the version. Plea

Re: RFS: protobuf

OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du dimanche 03 août 2008, vers 11:37, Iustin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > I didn't know if you prefer re-upload with the same version or not, so I > increased the version. Please alter the changelog as you see fit (e.g. > make it so it is actually 2.

Re: RFS: salasaga

OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du vendredi 01 août 2008, vers 11:17, "Iulian Udrea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > You can download it from the same location: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/salasaga/ > salasaga_0.8.0~alpha3-1.dsc salasaga_keycapture is not shipped any m

Re: RFS: protobuf

On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 10:36:05AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 02 août 2008, vers 17:45, > Iustin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > > > Any other feedback is welcome! And of course, sponsoring would be double > > so :) > > I can sponsor, but with

Re: RFS: libenglab

OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du mardi 22 juillet 2008, vers 02:33, Harry Serenis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libenglab". Hi Harry! I don't find your GPG key. Did you put it on some public key server? On clean, you should remove Makefile,

Re: RFS: bzr-cvsps-import

OoO Pendant le repas du mercredi 16 juillet 2008, vers 19:22, Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bzr-cvsps-import". Hi Jelmer! You can try to seek sponsorship inside Debian Bazaar Maintainers team. -- BOFH excuse #174: Backbone adjustme

Re: RFS: rsplib

OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du mercredi 16 juillet 2008, vers 13:20, Thomas Dreibholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > We are looking for a sponsor for our package "rsplib", a lightweight > framework > for server pool management, load distribution and balancing. > * Package name: r

Re: RFS: wmmon 1.0b2-15

OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du mardi 15 juillet 2008, vers 11:42, "Paul Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > Again, all the packaging appears to be ok, there isn't much to it but maybe > the commented lines in the debian/rules file could be removed... I am > not sure. Yes, you sho

Re: RFS: wmtime 1.0b2-10

OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du mardi 15 juillet 2008, vers 11:32, "Paul Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > Package name: wmtime > Version:1.0b2-10 > License:GPLv2 > Section:x11 > URL:Now dead upstream > Upstream Authors:

Re: RFS: protobuf

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 02 août 2008, vers 17:45, Iustin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > Any other feedback is welcome! And of course, sponsoring would be double > so :) I can sponsor, but without DM-Upload-Allowed. :) -- Make sure every module hides something.

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

On Sunday 03 August 2008 02:43:24 Ben Finney wrote: > Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > All other upstream files should be modified with patches. > > Or by some other method that results in the Debian source package > format, with a pristine upstream tarball and all maintainer