Subject: RFS: swac-get (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4-1 of my package "swac-get". Swac-get is a great program that allows to fill and manage a SQLite3 database with information provided by index of audio collections of words and expressions (SWAC). SWAC audio collections are maintain

Re: RFS: pacpl (2nd attempt)

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:45:42AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:32:50 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: > > Fixed! > > Thanks, downloaded, checked and uploaded. > > Feel free to contact me via private mail for new uploads of this > package. Really thanks, Gregor! Cristian

Re: RFS: pacpl (2nd attempt)

On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:32:50 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: > > I found two last small issues: > Fixed! Thanks, downloaded, checked and uploaded. Feel free to contact me via private mail for new uploads of this package. > > PS: I think this package would be a good candidate for the > > applicatio

Re: RFS: pacpl (2nd attempt)

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:52:14PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:49:37 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: > > A new package is available on mentors: > > dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pacpl/pacpl_4.0.3-1.dsc > > I found two last small issues: > * I'd either r

Re: RFS: pacpl (2nd attempt)

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:49:37 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: > [ I apologize for the private mail to Gregor, it was an error of mine. ] [ No problem, actually I saw the one on -mentors before :) ] > > > I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me. > > Just a few remarks: >

Re: RFS: pacpl (2nd attempt)

[ I apologize for the private mail to Gregor, it was an error of mine. ] Hi Gregor! On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 03:44:09PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:55:44 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: > > I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me. > > Just a f

Re: Updated vsftpd (RC bug fix, QA upload)

Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have uploaded it to mentors.debian.org. I hope that I have not > introduced any bugs in the interim. Any comments about my changes are > also very welcome. I'm happy to sponsor this upload since I use vsftpd. However, this change is extraneous: *

RFS: usbmount (ITA'ed, updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.15 of my package "usbmount". It was orphaned and I have just adopted it. I fixed all the lintian warnings in this first iteration and I plan on addressing more bugs in the near future. It builds this binary package: usbmount - au

Re: RFS: avr-evtd (a heartbeat daemon for some embedded NASes)

Dear Mentors, I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. If more information is needed, please let me know. The ITP bug is at . I reproduce the long description here to ease the life of potential sponsors: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

RFS: vbrfix (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.24-2 of my package "vbrfix". I will be including more clean-ups to the packaging as an iterative process during this weekend. It builds these binary packages: vbrfix - corrects MP3 files that have incorrect VBR information The p

Re: Updated vsftpd (RC bug fix, QA upload)

Hi again, mentors. On Sep 26 2008, Rogério Brito wrote: > The Debian package for vsftpd has some *very* old bugs and two release > critical bugs (duplicates). It would be nice to have it uploaded to the > archive. (...) > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > It b

RFS: openl2tp

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openl2tp". * Package name: openl2tp Version : 1.6-1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.openl2tp.org * License : GPL Section : net It builds these binary packages: openl2tp

Re: No response from MIA

Hello, On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, W. van den Akker wrote: > I am trying to get the maintainership for a package (SCID, et al). Does this mean that you are: 1. Working on bugs in the package --- in which case please file patches to the relevant bug report. 2. Working on a newer upstream version ---

Updated vsftpd (RC bug fix, QA upload)

Hi. The Debian package for vsftpd has some *very* old bugs and two release critical bugs (duplicates). It would be nice to have it uploaded to the archive. The maintainer seems to not react to bugs for a long time (>= 6 months). I have uploaded it to mentors.debian.org. I hope that I have not in

Re: RFS: pacpl (2nd attempt)

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:55:44 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: > It builds these binary packages: > pacpl - a multi-purpose audio converter/ripper/tagger script > > Long Description: > Perl Audio Converter is a tool for converting multiple audio types from one > format to another using various exter

RFS: pacpl (2nd attempt)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pacpl". * Package name: pacpl Version : 4.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Philip Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://pacpl.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-3 Section : sound It builds these binary

Re: To maintaining a package....

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 05:16:36PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > ...well no, you got to user the BTS[1] control server[2] to rename the > current orphaned bug[3] in a ITP[3] and then start work on the > package. Shouldn't it be an ITA - Intent to Adopt? signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SCons.

Alessio Giovanni Baroni wrote: > Hi to all, > the drqueue package use SCons as build system. The drqueue package > actually on > Debian no. I must to reconfigure the packge to use standard build > system? (autoconf/automake) No, add scons to the Build-Depends:, and then in debian/rules call the ne

SCons.

Hi to all, the drqueue package use SCons as build system. The drqueue package actually on Debian no. I must to reconfigure the packge to use standard build system? (autoconf/automake) Thanks to all.

Re: RFS: scim-waitzar

"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > debian/changelog is missing an ITP Specifically, in case the maintainer isn't aware of what this means: The initial release in the 'debian/changelog' should contain mention that it "Closes: bug#NN", where NN is the bug number of the ITP bug report