Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for blam version 1.8.6. Blam is a GTK/GNOME
feed reader whose main features are theming support and a simple
interface. As of this version it runs completely in managed mode.
The package appears lintian-clean and builds the following binary
packages:
blam -
This page was sent to you by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HI FRIEND,
I AM MAGRET THE DAUGHTER OF JACKSON WIBDOSS WHO HOLD COMPANY OF CFWRC IN
CANADA,PLEASE I HARD FROM MY FATHER OF RECRUTEMENT OF WORKERS IN YEARS 2008 TO
2009,THREE MOUNTH VACANCE BEFORE CLOSING DATED,THE COMPANY NEED ABOUT 17 PEOPLE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dhcp-probe.
* Package name: dhcp-probe
* Version : 1.2.2-1
* Upstream Author : Irwin Tillman (irwin AT princeton DOT edu)
* URL :
Le Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 05:48:40PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
I'm looking for a sponsor for blam version 1.8.6. Blam is a GTK/GNOME
feed reader whose main features are theming support and a simple
interface. As of this version it runs completely in managed mode.
By the way, since you
Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dhcp-probe.
In the Subject field you say “(first release after Chris Taylor
recommendation)”, implying you also made at least one release
*before* that recommendation.
* Package name:
Le Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:13:41PM +0200, Carlos Martín Nieto a écrit :
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for blam version 1.8.6. Blam is a GTK/GNOME
feed reader whose main features are theming support and a simple
interface. As of this version it runs completely in managed mode.
The
Hi,
I would like to ask if a software that contains a file with this:
--
Copyright (C) 2005, XX
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could be in main? (so is dfsg)
Yes.
I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something unclear
to me. Something as the classical licenses are clear, but this custom makes
me crazy.
It is
On Thursday 16 October 2008 16:01:06 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
[...]
could be in main? (so is dfsg)
I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something
unclear to me. Something as the classical licenses are clear, but this
custom makes me crazy.
This isn't custom -
Hi,
Sure, this license is just Attribution (and Don't use our names to
promote derivate products), so there should be absolutely no problem
with it.
(Disclaimer: IANADD, IANAL, etc.)
Regards,
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor.
--
To
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:01:06PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
I would like to ask if a software that contains a file with this:
--
Copyright (C) 2005, XX
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and
Hello release team, hello mentors,
the Ubuntu folks discovered a bug [1] in cracklib-runtime that turned
out to be caused by a bashism in its update-cracklib script. Steve
Langasek fixed the issue in the Ubuntu package and forwarded me a link
to the debdiff [2].
Unfortunately a new upstream
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something
unclear to me.
You've received correct responses (the license is effectively the same
as the 3-clause BSD license, minus warranty disclaimer).
If you have future questions
Le mercredi 08 octobre 2008 à 02:01, Ben Finney a écrit :
Yes, your ‘debian/rules’ should contain only those commands that are
specific to your package, and not leave any unused examples. The same
goes for the entire contents of ‘debian/’, too.
OK, now I tried to fully customise the different
14 matches
Mail list logo
