Re: RFS: cppcheck (3rd attempt)

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Robert Wohlrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 06 November 2008 00:19:38 Reijo Tomperi wrote: >> Sounds like a good advice, I will need to investigate that later. I'm >> thinking about using git as it has pretty good support for branches. > There are many pr

Re: RFS: cppcheck (3rd attempt)

On Thursday 06 November 2008 00:19:38 Reijo Tomperi wrote: > >>> - Vcs-((Git|SVN|..)|Browser) is missing in control. If you use a vcs to > >>> manage your debian package - please add these. > >> > >> I'm not using, but I have submitted the man page to the upstream so it > >> can be found from there

Re: RFS: cppcheck (3rd attempt)

Robert Wohlrab wrote: On Wednesday 05 November 2008 22:45:38 Reijo Tomperi wrote: Robert Wohlrab wrote: - watch file is missing (see uscan man page for sourceforge examples) Added (I hope it is correct, at least uscan from program's folder did not give any errors. Looks good. You can test it

Re: RFS: cppcheck (2nd attempt)

On Wednesday 05 November 2008 22:45:38 Reijo Tomperi wrote: > Robert Wohlrab wrote: > > - watch file is missing (see uscan man page for sourceforge examples) > > Added (I hope it is correct, at least uscan from program's folder did > not give any errors. Looks good. You can test it by running `usca

Re: RFS: cppcheck (2nd attempt)

Robert Wohlrab wrote: On Tuesday 04 November 2008 23:56:11 Reijo Tomperi wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppcheck". * Package name: cppcheck Version : 1.25-1 Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reijo Tomperi

Re: RFS: gstm (updated package)

Hello Ryan, On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 08:30, Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-5 > of my package "gstm". Nice work, uploaded! My only suggestions are (for the next revision): - fix this lintian warning (run v2.0.0 with -iI

Re: RFS: fex (2nd attempt)

OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mercredi 05 novembre 2008, vers 00:30, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : >> This kind of service is really useful for users that keep sending large >> piece of data through mail servers and then complain that this does not >> work. They need an easy s

Re: RFS: courier-pythonfilter

On Monday 03 November 2008 15:15, Stephan Peijnik wrote: > > These .py files are not to be executed directly in any way, other > > than from within the pythonfilter apps itself. > > If those files are not to be executed directly in any way removing > the shebang might a.) be a good idea and b.) fix

Re: RFS: winff (updated package)

I found a sponsor. Thanks. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: fex (2nd attempt)

* Giuseppe Iuculano [Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:02:33 +0100]: > I installed this service about a month ago, and feedbacks from my users are > extremely positive. Anyway I respect your (authoritative) point of view and so > I'm going to drop my ITP. I don't think the opinion of a single DD qualifies as "