Thanks Jose
> 3-clausule BSD is DFSG-compatible [0], there may be infinite
> BSD-licenses versions, just check they're DFSG-compatible by checking
> each of these points with the license. What you see different are just
> clausules the author adds and they may be restrictive at times... So if
> you
Hi,
2008/11/23 Mathieu Parent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
>
> Thanks for all your help
>
> 2008/11/23 Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
>>
>>> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 6.0.7~)
>>
>> what is that tilde doing there? (lintian should probably warn about it)
> the tilde is for eventual b
Hi Sandro
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:33:57PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> ehm, I personally like to have all the changes in the revision =
> "current revision in debian"+1, so -6, and you have the opportunity to
> "fix" this since your package FTBFS if build twice in a row. what
> does this mea
FYI: python-uniconvertor 1.1.2-2 uploaded to testing-proposed-updates
pgpVX3N02iglF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi Sandro
>And thanks for the answer
>>>I am trying to package software that contains code with different BSD
>>> licenses. However, none of the licenses are similar to
>>> /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD
>> So simp
Hello Gudo,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 16:23, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Sandro,
>
> I'm a little confused about your suggestion with regards to README.source.
sorry about that, I'm attaching a sample file I use in some of my packages, HTH.
>
> Sandro Tosi schreef:
>>
>> ... and
Hello Jonathan,
thanks a lot for the fast reply.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 15:21, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:00:52AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> - no need to "[ ! -f configure-stamp ] || ..." since -stamp targets
>> are only executed is -stamp file is
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Nicolas Spalinger
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [..]
>>
>>> I will include your changes in
>>> the current pkg-fonts team-maintained packaging tomorrow.
>>
>> Theppitak's work
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Nicolas Spalinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [..]
>
>> I will include your changes in
>> the current pkg-fonts team-maintained packaging tomorrow.
>
> Theppitak's work is integrated in a updated package available on:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/
l/main/t/ttf-sil-gentium/ttf-sil-gentium_1.02-7.dsc
> (The work is also in our team svn).
H:
ttf-sil-gentium (20081126:1.02-7) unstable; urgency=low
* preinst: Clear obsolete conffile. (Closes: #455109). (Thanks to Theppitak
Karoonboonyanan)
Missing blank line somewhere...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hey Sandro,
I'm a little confused about your suggestion with regards to README.source.
Sandro Tosi schreef:
... and we expect to find in this file the
information to "use" the source package that *differs* from the normal
way; so, no need to say "use dpkg-source -x .dsc" to obtain the debian
pa
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:00:52AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> debian/compat
> - has 5 while you declare versioned build-dep on debhelper >=7
> debian/rules
> - don't export DH_VERBOSE
> - you can remove the commented header
Fixed
> - no need to "[ ! -f configure-stamp ] || ..." since -stamp targ
[..]
> I will include your changes in
> the current pkg-fonts team-maintained packaging tomorrow.
Theppitak's work is integrated in a updated package available on:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-sil-gentium/ttf-sil-gentium_1.02-7.dsc
(The work is also in our team svn).
I'm look
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 13:23:36 Michal Čihař wrote:
> On the other side, I would expect shared
> library package to exist, but there is none.
Ok, I decided to stop to try to create a debian packages of exactimage for now
because it does not fulfil his function as library and only provides b
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 13:23:36 Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
Thx for your response
> Dne Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:13:22 +0100
>
> Sven Eckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> > It builds these binary packages:
> > bardecode - command-line barcode decoder
> > e2mtiff- any to multi-page TIFF c
Hi Sandro
And thanks for the answer
> >I am trying to package software that contains code with different BSD
> > licenses. However, none of the licenses are similar to
> > /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD
>
> So simply include those licenses in debian/copyright along with the
> files they're a
Hi
Dne Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:13:22 +0100
Sven Eckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> It builds these binary packages:
> bardecode - command-line barcode decoder
> e2mtiff- any to multi-page TIFF converter
> econvert - Fast Imagemagick convert clone
> edentify - Fast Imagemagick identif
Hi
Dne Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:43:58 -0800
Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> [...]
> > - debian/README.source content should be rather in debian/README.Debian
> >
>
> I think this is not entirely true:
> - First paragraph in there is ok (dhcp-probe for Debian)
But it IMHO does no
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 19:12, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/11/2008):
>> yes it it: you have to provide a programmatical way to
>> retrive/generate the orig.tar.gz […]
>
> FSVO "have to". It is clearly tagged as optional in Policy §4.9.
Thanks Ki
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 02:32, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am seeking a sponsor for my package webcpp
Here a review:
debian/compat
- has 5 while you declare versioned build-dep on debhelper >=7
debian/rules
- don't export DH_VERBOSE
- you can remove the co
Hello Gudjon,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 07:25, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>I am trying to package software that contains code with different BSD
> licenses. However, none of the licenses are similar to
> /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD
So simply include those licenses i
21 matches
Mail list logo
