Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-11 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Eric Cooper writes: > What is the best way to register a daemon under inetd with a > user-chosen port? (I am packaging a daemon that is run by inetd, but > does not have a standard port number.) > > Currently I am prompting the user for the port via debconf, grepping > /etc/inetd.conf to make su

RFS: redmine

2009-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "redmine". * Package name: redmine Version : 0.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Jean-Philippe Lang * URL : http://www.redmine.org * License : GPL-2 Section : web It builds these binary packages: redmin

Re: RFS: redmine

2009-03-11 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi Jérémy, Rather than installing vendor/plugins, all of the plugins should be packaged. Gunnar Wolf did will_paginate, you can look at that for an example. Also in debian/copyright, what does "License: none" mean? Does that mean that it can't be distributed? It needs a license.. There's also t

Re: RFS: redmine

2009-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 11/03/2009 15:54, Ryan Niebur wrote: Hi Jérémy, Rather than installing vendor/plugins, all of the plugins should be packaged. Gunnar Wolf did will_paginate, you can look at that for an example. ok, i'm going to have a look Also in debian/copyright, what does "License: none" mean? Does th

Re: RFS: redmine

2009-03-11 Thread Ryan Niebur
also, shouldn't Richard be mentioned as a copyright holder for the debian packaging? It looks like you based your package off of his.. -- _ Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: nedit (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi It has been a month since my last mail. Although the files at mentors seem to attract reasonable traffic, I have not heard back from anybody. Would somebody be interested in commenting on my work (target experimental) on packaging a release candidate of nedit (lesstif2 based text editor) which

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-11 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Eric Cooper writes: What is the best way to register a daemon under inetd with a user-chosen port? (I am packaging a daemon that is run by inetd, but does not have a standard port number.) Currently I am prompting the user for the port via debconf, grepping /etc/inetd.conf to make sure it's n

Re: RFS: nedit (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Tony Mancill
Hi Paul, I must have missed your previous email. I'm a long-time nedit user, and so am happy to see it continue to be supported. Give me a little time to get a few other things taken care of on my side and I'll review it and prepare an upload. Thank you, Tony On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:45 +0100,

RFS: lynkeos.app (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-4 of my package "lynkeos.app". It builds these binary packages: lynkeos.app - Tool to process planetary astronomical images for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean. (Actually, there are two linitan warnings -- postinst

Re: RFS: lynkeos.app (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Barry deFreese
Yavor Doganov wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-4 of my package "lynkeos.app". It builds these binary packages: lynkeos.app - Tool to process planetary astronomical images for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean. (Actually, there are two linit

debian/rules

2009-03-11 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello, I just going through "New Maintainers' Guide" and editing debian/rules file. In NMG is sentence: "If your package is an `Architecture: all' one, you need to include all the commands for building the package under the `binary-indep' rule, and leave the `binary-arch' rule empty instead."

RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 of my package "tmux". It builds these binary packages: tmux - terminal multiplexer The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread René Mayorga
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:35:38PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 > of my package "tmux". > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you c

Re: debian/rules

2009-03-11 Thread Daniel Moerner
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hello, > > I just going through "New Maintainers' Guide" and editing debian/rules file. > > In NMG is sentence: > "If your package is an `Architecture: all' one, you need to include all the > commands for building the package under the `bin

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Hi, Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:35:38PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 > > of my package "tmux". > > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package wa

Re: debian/rules

2009-03-11 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
< That is the correct approach, as far as I know. Be aware that you < should remove the commented "dh_*" commands prior to attempting to < upload the package or getting a sponsor, see the minor issues section < of http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html Thanks for advice and link it can r

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-11 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Giacomo A. Catenazzi [Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:56:20 +0100]: > how to had new services in /etc/services database? By filing a bug like #353835 (against netbase). -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.o

RFS: libmx4j-java (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi Varun, On Tuesday 10 March 2009 23:30:20 Varun Hiremath wrote: > Hi Damien, > > On Tue, 10 Mar, 2009 at 12:13:49AM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0.2-5 > > of package "libmx4j-java" : > > Looks good. Uploaded. It's t

Re: RFS: nbc

2009-03-11 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Sebastian, > > Would you mind explaining why lazarus-ide is required to build this > > package? I'd > > strongly dislike installing all kinds of X libraries to build a package > > that is > > completely unrelated to X/GTK. > > > > Thanks, > > Michael > > Hi Michael, > > I also strongly dis

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Ben Finney
Karl Ferdinand Ebert writes: > Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: > > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been > > uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you > > changelog entry for the first release, it is only state «Closes: > > #

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 23:23:39 schrieb Ben Finney: > Karl Ferdinand Ebert writes: > > Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: > > > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been > > > uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you > > > chang

dpkg-buildpackage -S error

2009-03-11 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello, having this error running sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. /usr/bin/make PREFIX = /usr clean make: *** empty variable name. Stop. make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)

RFS: clewn

2009-03-11 Thread Remy Dautriche
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clewn". * Package name: clewn Version : 1.14-1 Upstream Author : xdeg...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://clewn.sourceforge.net * License : GPLv2 Section : devel It builds these binary pack

Re: RFS: libmx4j-java (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Varun Hiremath
Hi Damien, On Wed, 11 Mar, 2009 at 10:45:30PM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Hi Varun, > > On Tuesday 10 March 2009 23:30:20 Varun Hiremath wrote: > > Hi Damien, > > > > On Tue, 10 Mar, 2009 at 12:13:49AM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > I am looking for a sp

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -S error

2009-03-11 Thread Ben Finney
Jaromír Mikeš writes: > having this error running sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S So, you're trying to build a source package. > debian/rules clean > dh_testdir > dh_testroot > rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp > # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. > /usr/bin/make PREFIX = /usr

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > tmux       - terminal multiplexer This sounds very much like 'screen', what advantages does it have over 'screen'? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Paul Wise wrote: > This sounds very much like 'screen', what advantages does it have over > 'screen'? Just quoting from the FAQ: * How is tmux different from GNU screen? What else does it offer? tmux offers several advantages over screen: - a clearly-de

Re: debian/rules

2009-03-11 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:50:01PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš a écrit : > build-stamp: configure-stamp > $(MAKE) -C source/ PREFIX=/usr > > clean: > -$(MAKE) -C source/ PREFIX=/usr clean > > install: build > $(MAKE) -C source/ PREFIX=/usr DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/jkmeter install Dea

Re: RFS: redmine

2009-03-11 Thread Albert Lash
I'm not a DD but I've been quite interested in trying out redmine. Thanks for packaging it! > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "redmine". > > * Package name: redmine >Version : 0.9.0-1 >Upstream Author : Jean-Philippe Lang > * URL : http:

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 > of my package "tmux". Here are some comments: - add FAQ to docs - add CHANGES file as upstream changelog - ITP bug will be closed by the first upload not the first packaging attempt