Re: RFS: elgg

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Brett Profitt wrote: > I have to respectfully disagree that this is a sign of code quality. > I can agree that allowing multiple sites is good practice, but it is a > feature of the software, not an indication of code quality.  Many--if > not most--of the PHP appli

Re: RFS: valkyrie

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 21:53, Hai Zaar wrote: > -- > Zaar > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, LI Daobing wrote: >> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 20:16, Hai Zaar wrote: >>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:59 AM, LI Daobing wrote: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: 2. no watch file

Re: RFS: sysvbanner (updated package)

Ryan Niebur wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.15 of my package "sysvbanner". It builds these binary packages: sysvbanner - System-V banner clone The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 526847(FTBFS), 527153(ITA) The pack

Update on "MyOS" and scim-waitzar/libwaitzar (Attn. Paul Wise)

Good evening, Paul, a while ago, you suggested that the Burmese community should have something like KhmerOS. The purpose of this email is to update the Debian developers on how the Burmese community responded to this idea, and to ask for advice on submitting scim-waitzar (again) for review,

Re: RFS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors

On Wed, 6 May 2009 20:44:49 -0400 Andrew wrote: > I have a more general question on debian/copyright. Obviously all of > the above needs to be resolved, but upstream has mentioned in the past > that they are simply interested in having a free license and are not > tied to GPL-3. So I wonder if the

RFS: sysvbanner (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.15 of my package "sysvbanner". It builds these binary packages: sysvbanner - System-V banner clone The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 526847(FTBFS), 527153(ITA) The package can be found on m