Re: RFS (resent): libdumbnet

2009-05-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Jan C. Nordholz j...@gmx.net wrote: If you're still willing to sponsor libdnet: upstream is not very active (wrt. source changes), but responds quickly. Review below. Upstream location has changed, too. Argh, there is no indication at the sf.net page that it

RFS: alarm-clock (updated package, adoption, targetted for experimental)

2009-05-13 Thread Ryan Niebur
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0a2-1 of my package alarm-clock. It builds these binary packages: alarm-clock - Alarm Clock for GTK Environments The package appears to be lintian clean. For experimental because it's a rewrite in C and doesn't yet have all of the

RFS: storebackup (updated package, adoption, for experimental)

2009-05-13 Thread Ryan Niebur
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.1~rc1-1 of my package storebackup. It builds these binary packages: storebackup - fancy compressing managing checksumming hard-linking cp -ua The package appears to be lintian clean. I am wanting it to be uploaded to experimental

RFS: dhttpd (updated package)

2009-05-13 Thread Ryan Niebur
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.02a-18 of my package dhttpd. It builds these binary packages: dhttpd - minimal secure webserver without cgi-bin support The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 333553, 447580, 455410, 468845,

Re: RFS: gearmand

2009-05-13 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Monty Taylor schrieb: * Package name: gearmand Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : Eric Day and Brian Aker * URL : http://launchpad.net/gearmand * License : BSD Section : web Which programming languages? It builds these binary packages: gearman

Should clean revert everything to pristine source?

2009-05-13 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On many of my packages, the configure phase modifies some files (e.g. Makefile). The lines which are overwritten are totally irrelevant: they reflect the particular set-up on which the upstream developer has packaged the original source.

Re: Should clean revert everything to pristine source?

2009-05-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Thibaut, On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:32, Thibaut Paumard paum...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On many of my packages, the configure phase modifies some files (e.g. Makefile). The lines which are overwritten are totally irrelevant: they reflect the particular set-up on which the upstream

Re: Should clean revert everything to pristine source?

2009-05-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Thibaut Paumard paum...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On many of my packages, the configure phase modifies some files (e.g. Makefile). The lines which are overwritten are totally irrelevant: they reflect the particular set-up on which the upstream developer

Re: RFS: sphinxsearch

2009-05-13 Thread Tom Simnett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jérémy Lal wrote: On 12/05/2009 19:56, Tom Simnett wrote: Ben Finney wrote: Jérémy Lalje...@edagames.com writes: These command names are rather too generic. Perhaps they should be prefixed with ‘sphinx-’? These all look like installing the

Re: RFS: sphinxsearch

2009-05-13 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 13/05/2009 13:40, Tom Simnett wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jérémy Lal wrote: On 12/05/2009 19:56, Tom Simnett wrote: Ben Finney wrote: Jérémy Lalje...@edagames.com writes: These command names are rather too generic. Perhaps they should be prefixed with

Re: RFS: sphinxsearch

2009-05-13 Thread Tom Simnett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jérémy Lal wrote: Well, you should try http://www.sphinxsearch.com/downloads.html :) exemple of line in the watch file (although maybe the regexp part is wrong) : # Compulsory line, this is a version 3 file version=3

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-13 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:35 -0700, Monty Taylor wrote: 3. consider remove the .la file if you already have a .pc file. Is that a policy/best practice for library packages? I've uploaded a new copy to mentors with 1 and 2 fixed. I'd like to know more about 3 before making that change.

RFS: scrot (updated package)

2009-05-13 Thread William Vera
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-9 of my package scrot. It builds these binary packages: scrot - command line screen capture utility The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 469914 The package can be found on

RFS: recoverjpeg (updated package)

2009-05-13 Thread William Vera
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.4-1 of my package recoverjpeg. It builds these binary packages: recoverjpeg - tool to recover JPEG images from a filesystem image The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

how package app selinux policy?

2009-05-13 Thread AndreMachado
Hello, I am trying to find docs teaching how to package (the right debian way) an application SELinux custom policy. Could you point some urls to study this packaging procedure (policy, dev helper scripts, etc)? At the [1], I found somewhat vague instructions (for a newbie) regarding custom

RFS: libnet (updated package)

2009-05-13 Thread Stefanos Harhalakis
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.3-2 of my package libnet. It builds these binary packages: libnet1- library for the construction and handling of network packets libnet1-dbg - debugging symbols for libnet libnet1-dev - development files for libnet libnet1-doc

Re: RFS: sphinxsearch

2009-05-13 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
I'm not a DD just wanted to see how to used docbase... But here are my 2 russian kopejkas. 2009/5/13 Tom Simnett t...@initforthe.com: Hope I'm not missing anything else now :) (New version uploaded again) Tom 1) rules - have you though of using dh7 style? (just %: dh @ with overrides) Or is

Re: RFS: alarm-clock (updated package, adoption, targetted for experimental)

2009-05-13 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/5/13 Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com: For experimental because it's a rewrite in C and doesn't yet have all of the features of the python version. Upstream recommended leaving the python version in unstable for now. I thought upstream was dead. Is it same upstream Also with

RFS: hwinfo (updated package)

2009-05-13 Thread William Vera
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 15.3-2 of my package hwinfo. It builds these binary packages: hwinfo - Hardware identification system libhd-dev - Hardware identification system library and headers libhd-doc - Hardware identification system library documentation