RFS: nautilus-image-converter (updated package)

2009-05-24 Thread Julien Lavergne
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.0-3 of my package "nautilus-image-converter". It's mostly an upload to unstable of the package for now in experimental, following GNOME migration. It builds these binary packages: nautilus-image-converter - nautilus extension to mas

RFS: NEW: dico 2.0-1

2009-05-24 Thread أحمد المحمودي
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dico". This package is NEW to Debian. The ITP number is: 522368 * Package name: dico Version : 2.0 Debian Revision : 1 Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff * URL : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/software/dico

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-converter (updated package)

2009-05-24 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:33:34 +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.0-3 > of my package "nautilus-image-converter". > It's mostly an upload to unstable of the package for now in > experimental, following GNOME migration. This package

RFS: kde-plasmoid-yawp

2009-05-24 Thread Kai Wasserbäch
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plasma-widget-yawp". * Package name: plasma-widget-yawp Version : 0.2.3-1 Upstream Author : Pierpaolo Vittorini , Marián Kyral , Ezequiel Aguerre , Ruan Strydom *

Re: How to get rid of dir-or-file-in-var-run?

2009-05-24 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-05-23 12:23] Daniel Moerner > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:05 AM, markus schnalke wrote: > > > >I maintain masqmail, a mail transfer agent. It stores files in > >/var/run. Now I have this lintian warning: dir-or-file-in-var-run. > > > >Unfortunately, I dont know how to get the warning disappe

Re: How to get rid of dir-or-file-in-var-run?

2009-05-24 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-05-23 20:52] Russ Allbery > markus schnalke writes: > > > I maintain masqmail, a mail transfer agent. It stores files in > > /var/run. Now I have this lintian warning: dir-or-file-in-var-run. > > > > Unfortunately, I dont know how to get the warning disappear. > > > > I checked the init sc

Both dpkg-source -x foo.dsc and lintian seems to ignore trustedkeys.gpg keyring

2009-05-24 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
Hi, before filing bugs and doing it wrong, I need to ask: A few hours ago, after upgrading my system, I got a new warning from lintian in my packages (I'm not on debian-maintainers.gpg keyring): $ lintian -i -I subtitlecomposer_0.5.2-1.dsc I: subtitlecomposer source: tar-errors-from-source gpgv:

Re: Both dpkg-source -x foo.dsc and lintian seems to ignore trustedkeys.gpg keyring

2009-05-24 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 José Manuel Santamaría Lema schrieb: > Hi, before filing bugs and doing it wrong, I need to ask: > > > A few hours ago, after upgrading my system, I got a new warning from > lintian in my packages (I'm not on debian-maintainers.gpg keyring): > > >

Re: Both dpkg-source -x foo.dsc and lintian seems to ignore trustedkeys.gpg keyring

2009-05-24 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
On Domingo, 24 de Mayo de 2009 18:45:08 Patrick Matthäi escribió: > José Manuel Santamaría Lema schrieb: > > Hi, before filing bugs and doing it wrong, I need to ask: > > > > > > A few hours ago, after upgrading my system, I got a new warning from > > lintian in my packages (I'm not on debian-maint

RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-05-24 Thread krzysztof
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.5-1 of my package "poco". It builds these binary packages: libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components libpococrypto8 - The C++ Portable Components Crypto library libpococrypto8-dbg - The C++ Portable Com

Re: Both dpkg-source -x foo.dsc and lintian seems to ignore trustedkeys.gpg keyring

2009-05-24 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-05-24 18:45] Patrick Matthäi > José Manuel Santamaría Lema schrieb: > > > > A few hours ago, after upgrading my system, I got a new warning from > > lintian in my packages (I'm not on debian-maintainers.gpg keyring): > > > > > > $ lintian -i -I subtitlecomposer_0.5.2-1.dsc > > I: subtitle

Re: RFS: kde-plasmoid-yawp

2009-05-24 Thread Chris Bannister
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:57:51PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kde-plasmoid-yawp". > > * Package name: kde-plasmoid-yawp > Version : 0.2.3-1 > Upstream Author : Pierpaolo Vittorini , > Marián Kyral ,

Re: Both dpkg-source -x foo.dsc and lintian seems to ignore trustedkeys.gpg keyring

2009-05-24 Thread Russ Allbery
José Manuel Santamaría Lema writes: > A few hours ago, after upgrading my system, I got a new warning from lintian > in my packages (I'm not on debian-maintainers.gpg keyring): > > $ lintian -i -I subtitlecomposer_0.5.2-1.dsc > I: subtitlecomposer source: tar-errors-from-source gpgv: Signature m

Re: RFS: kde-plasmoid-yawp

2009-05-24 Thread Kai Wasserbäch
Hello Chris, Chris Bannister schrieb: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:57:51PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: >> kde-plasmoid-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid fetches weather forcasts >> for you > > The correct spelling is forecasts. I know, and if you have a look at [0] (and the m.d.n page [1]),

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-05-24 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Elimar Riesebieter [090521 15:55 +0200] > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.7.0-1 > of my package "ripit". > > It builds these binary packages: > ripit - Textbased audio cd ripper Is uploaded. #grml cooperated very flexible. Elimar -- The path to

RFS: masqmail (updated package)

2009-05-24 Thread markus schnalke
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6 of my package "masqmail". It builds these binary packages: masqmail - mail transport agent for intermittently connected hosts The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 174975, 416237, 417842,

RFS: osgppu (3rd try)

2009-05-24 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osgppu". There are no changes in packaging since the first RFS I sent almost three months ago, I keep trying to find someone interested in sponsoring this package :-) * Package name: osgppu Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author :

Re: RFS: osgppu (3rd try)

2009-05-24 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 24 May 2009 23:33:06 +0200 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osgppu". There are no > changes in packaging since the first RFS I sent almost three months > ago, I keep trying to find someone interested in sponsoring this > package :-

About get-orig-source - latest or always the same?

2009-05-24 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Dear mentors I have a question about policy with respect to get-orig-source and it's use with the DFSG tarballs. The policy 4.9 says: "This target fetches the most recent version of the original source package from a canonical archive site (via FTP or WWW, for example), does any necessary rearra

Confused by .dirs, .install etc

2009-05-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I have a problem building a library, starting with a dh_make template. The basic problem seems to boil down to files don't get moved from DESTDIR (debian/tmp) into the actual packages, so the final *.deb packages are empty. It seems like the .dirs and .install files in debian/ are something to do

Re: Confused by .dirs, .install etc

2009-05-24 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/5/24 Richard W.M. Jones : > I have a problem building a library, starting with a dh_make template. > The basic problem seems to boil down to files don't get moved from > DESTDIR (debian/tmp) into the actual packages, so the final *.deb > packages are empty. > > It seems like the .dirs and .ins

Re: Confused by .dirs, .install etc

2009-05-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:28:10PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > You are using debhelper to get there so read debhelper documentation > > # general > man debhelper > man dh > > # about debian/*.dirs > man dh_installdirs > > # about debian/*.install > man dh_install > > # also read for a few

Re: RFS: osgppu (3rd try)

2009-05-24 Thread Rogério Brito
On May 24 2009, Neil Williams wrote: > It would help if you included the long descriptions - I have no idea > what GLSL is meant to mean and the package name makes even less sense. (...) > The Programming Language is also missing, as are details of whether > this is an updated package, a new packag

Re: Confused by .dirs, .install etc

2009-05-24 Thread Jack Kelly
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I have a problem building a library, starting with a dh_make template. > The basic problem seems to boil down to files don't get moved from > DESTDIR (debian/tmp) into the actual packages, so the final *.deb > packages are empty. > > It

Re: Confused by .dirs, .install etc

2009-05-24 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> I have a problem building a library, starting with a dh_make template. >> The basic problem seems to boil down to files don't get moved from >> DESTDIR (debian/tmp) into the actual packages, so the fi

Re: Confused by .dirs, .install etc

2009-05-24 Thread Jack Kelly
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly wrote: >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones >> wrote: >>> I have a problem building a library, starting with a dh_make template. >>> The basic problem seems to boil down to files don't get moved f

Re: About get-orig-source - latest or always the same?

2009-05-24 Thread Andres Mejia
On Sunday 24 May 2009 18:15:25 Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > Dear mentors > > I have a question about policy with respect to get-orig-source and > it's use with the DFSG tarballs. > > The policy 4.9 says: > > "This target fetches the most recent version of the original source > package from a canonical

Re: Confused by .dirs, .install etc

2009-05-24 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote: >> On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly wrote: >>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones >>> wrote: I have a problem building a library, starting with a dh_make template. The basic problem seem

Re: Confused by .dirs, .install etc

2009-05-24 Thread Daniel Moerner
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Jack Kelly wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote: >> On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly wrote: >>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones >>> wrote: I have a problem building a library, starting with a dh_make template. The

Re: Confused by .dirs, .install etc

2009-05-24 Thread Jack Kelly
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Daniel Moerner wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Jack Kelly wrote: >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote: >>> On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I have a problem

Re: RFS: osgppu (3rd try)

2009-05-24 Thread Paul Wise
2009/5/25 Rogério Brito : > What happened to my proposal for a new template of packages to be > sponsored? The reactions seemed to be that it was an improvement over > what mentors.d.n offers currently. The maintainers of mentors.d.n don't nessecarily follow this list, please contact them directl

Re: Questions about packaging nautilussvn (adapting upstream debianisation, restarting nautilus)

2009-05-24 Thread Jason Heeris
> 2. The upstream tarball is 'nautilus_0.12-beta1-2.tar.gz', and the > changelog version in their packaging is '0.12-1ubuntu1'. I changed > this to '0.12.beta1.2', but now I realise that it will be detected as > an NMU (at least, lintian thinks it is). This was due to a typo in the changelog, sill