On 09/05/27 13:41 -0700, Russ Allbery said ...
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag app...@debian.org writes:
I read that part of policy (only likely to be useful if you already
know what they are) as there is an optional package that has been
built out of the same source package, but this one is built
Dear mentors,
This is a repost, since my RFS of a week ago may have slipped through
the cracks. I am looking for an inspection (and eventual sponsorship)
for my package libfake437.
* Package name: libfake437
Version : 0.4-3
Upstream Author : Jack Kelly endgame@gmail.com
* URL
Hello,
i'm trying to build an libary package from my sourcecode.
At first i build an regular package with dh_make and single binary included the
libary. Everything is fine and works.
Now i want to build an libary and an binary package, but as i read the manual i
can build only an libary
Hello,
i'm trying to build an libary package from my sourcecode.
At first i build an regular package with dh_make and single binary included the
libary. Everything is fine and works.
Now i want to build an libary and an binary package, but as i read the manual i
can build only an libary
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:59:35PM +0200, yo...@gmx.net wrote:
Can somebody point me to a step by step documentation for libraries. I can
only find doc for normal binary packaging. Is it possible to build lib and
program with one command (build)?
The Debian Library Packaging Guide is
Hi Jonathan,
The Debian Library Packaging Guide is best:
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
I founded this guide, but there are no commands with debuild etc. Do I don't
need that?
yonah
--
Der Langsamste, der sein Ziel nicht aus den Augen verliert,
geht
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:10:52PM +0200, Yonah Brendon Franklin wrote:
I founded this guide, but there are no commands with debuild etc. Do I don't
need that?
Your package is still built in the normal way (see [1]) but there are
specific details you need to pay attention to when packaging
On 2009-05-28 14:06 +0200, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:59:35PM +0200, yo...@gmx.net wrote:
Can somebody point me to a step by step documentation for libraries. I can
only find doc for normal binary packaging. Is it possible to build lib and
program with one command
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:24:33PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
I cannot claim to have much expertise in library packaging, but would
like to warn that this document gives bad advice regarding the name of
-dev packages. See http://bugs.debian.org/493951.
In general, -dev packages should not
On 2009-05-28 14:38 +0200, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:24:33PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
I cannot claim to have much expertise in library packaging, but would
like to warn that this document gives bad advice regarding the name of
-dev packages. See
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.3-1 of my
package libdebug. This is an attempt to adopt the package,
turn it into a non-native one, become upstream, bring the Debian
packaging up to the current standards and best practices, and
fix the single outstanding bug.
Hi, Alexander.
On May 27 2009, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
* Package name: agedu
Version : 8442-2
Upstream Author : Simon Tatham ana...@pobox.com
* URL : http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/
* License : MIT
Section : utils
(...)
[2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6
of my package masqmail.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who?
The mail from mentors does not contain a name and
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 05:21:12PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who?
The mail from mentors does not contain a name and I found no upload
logs or a similar source.
The signature on the uploaded .dsc says it was bubulle:
gpg: Signature made Tue 26
markus schnalke wrote:
[2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6
of my package masqmail.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who?
The mail from mentors
On 09/05/28 17:21 +0200, markus schnalke said ...
[2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6
of my package masqmail.
Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who?
The mail from mentors does not contain a name and I
Hello,
I recently got an RC bug (#530653) which turned out to be a change
in dpkg's update-alternative (the string and output channel of an
error message was changed which is used in the preinst). So I
prepared a new package, but this of course will only work with the
dpkg in unstable (not the
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de wrote:
I recently got an RC bug (#530653) which turned out to be a change
in dpkg's update-alternative (the string and output channel of an
error message was changed which is used in the preinst). So I
prepared a new
Am 28.05.2009 um 19:34 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
I recently got an RC bug (#530653) which turned out to be a change
in dpkg's update-alternative (the string and output channel of an
error message was changed which is used in the preinst). So I
prepared a new package, but this of course
Hello Sven,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
I don't know why this preinst script is necessary, but if you need to
insure that the new update-alternatives script is run in it, you have to
use Pre-Depends rather than Depends. See Policy § 7.2.
Thanks, I missed the
Am 28.05.2009 um 20:16 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
I don't know why this preinst script is necessary, but if you need to
insure that the new update-alternatives script is run in it, you have to
use Pre-Depends rather than Depends.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package skanlite.
* Package name: skanlite
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Kåre Särs kare.s...@iki.fi
Arseniy Lartsev receive-s...@yandex.ru
* URL :
[2009-05-28 22:25] Y Giridhar Appaji Nag app...@debian.org
On 09/05/28 17:21 +0200, markus schnalke said ...
[2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6
of my package masqmail.
Now, someone did ... but how can I
Hello Sven,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:01:32PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
Am 28.05.2009 um 20:16 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
The reason is the following in the preinst (which I inherited, so if
it is wrong, I gladly
[Rince, 2009-05-28]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gddrescue/gddrescue_1.10+nmu2.dsc
* shold not be a native package
* wrong distribution
* wrong version
* Update standards and compat settings to latest sid. doesn't tell me
much about what and why changed
[stopped checking here]
On torsdagen den 16 april 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
2009/4/16 Laurent Léonard laur...@open-minds.org:
So .dfsg is a bad suffix ? And +dfsg should be used in priority ? If
1.2+dfsg/1.2-dfsg/1.2dfsg sort before 1.2.1 why are there different
suffixes ? I don't find clear informations about that
Hello,
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
* Package name: agedu
Version : 8442-2
Upstream Author : Simon Tatham ana...@pobox.com
* URL : http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/
* License : MIT
Section : utils
It builds
Thanks for taking a look at the package!
I believe I addressed all the issues correctly in the version I just
uploaded now. See below for details :)
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean.
Appearances are deceptive. :-) Run a recent version of lintian with
the
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag app...@debian.org writes:
I agree with this particular example. But I could argue if would
reasonbly want to install Kerberos if I Didn't know what it was.
I've not seen ftp-master enforce the distinction between optional and
extra, not even in the cases where it is
Hello,
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 19:50, أحمد المحمودي
aelmahmo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dico.
This package is NEW to Debian. The ITP number is: 522368
* Package name : dico
Version : 2.0
Debian Revision : 1
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:48:35PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
uploaded.
---end quoted text---
Thanks !
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 (@ subkeys.pgp.net)
GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
--
To
31 matches
Mail list logo
