Re: RFS: gtklp (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Zak B. Elep
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 22:48 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote: > Note that I'm not closing the door on separating patches as files > altogether; I may go back to simple-patchsys style when I have more than > a handful of patches to keep. And go back, I did. ;) I've updated my gtklp to 1.2.7-2, here's the

Re: Need help for xiterm+thai on s390 compilation failed

2009-08-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Neutron Soutmun wrote: > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=xiterm%2Bthai&ver=1.09-2&arch=s390&stamp=1249926993&file=log > > The issue is the link fail to the function getutmpx(), I'm not sure about the > different definition about this function on this archi

Re: RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.2 (Lenny security bug fixes)

2009-08-27 Thread Ben Finney
Felipe Sateler writes: > I believe packages with updates to stable debian releases are versioned > -+lenny1 or something like that. Felipe Sateler writes: > BTW, I know this is not a hard requirement, but it is to easily detect > stable updates. Okay. Given that the release team has approve

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Zak B. Elep
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 18:38 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Zak B. Elep schrieb: > > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:48 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:22 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >>> Okay, please report it against CDBS. >

Re: how to upload a debian binary for lyx

2009-08-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:55:40PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Hi, > There's a team maintaining the lyx package. You can reach it by e-mail > via Debian LyX Maintainers . > Please ask them if you can help them / join their team. Yes you can. ;) We maintain a wiki page http://wiki.de

Re: RFS: logiweb

2009-08-27 Thread Jens Peter Secher
Hi Klaus! 2009/8/27 Klaus Grue : > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logiweb". > I will take a look at the package. Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it

Need help for xiterm+thai on s390 compilation failed

2009-08-27 Thread Neutron Soutmun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=xiterm%2Bthai&ver=1.09-2&arch=s390&stamp=1249926993&file=log The issue is the link fail to the function getutmpx(), I'm not sure about the different definition about this function on this architecture (s390) wh

Re: RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.2 (Lenny security bug fixes)

2009-08-27 Thread Felipe Sateler
Felipe Sateler wrote: > Ben Finney wrote: > >> Howdy mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new release 0.4.3-2.2 of my package >> ‘burn’ in Lenny. > > I believe packages with updates to stable debian releases are versioned > -+lenny1 or something like that. BTW, I know this is not

Re: RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.2 (Lenny security bug fixes)

2009-08-27 Thread Felipe Sateler
Ben Finney wrote: > Howdy mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new release 0.4.3-2.2 of my package > ‘burn’ in Lenny. I believe packages with updates to stable debian releases are versioned -+lenny1 or something like that. -- Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-me

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zak B. Elep schrieb: > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:48 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:22 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >>> Okay, please report it against CDBS. >> I have, waiting for the ticket. > > Its Debian Bug #543916. > > In t

Re: RFS: ttt (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony Palma schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7-4 > of my package "ttt". > > It builds these binary packages: > ttt- A standalone program for local traffic-monitoring > tttprobe - A probe to collec

RFS: ttt (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Tony Palma
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7-4 of my package "ttt". It builds these binary packages: ttt- A standalone program for local traffic-monitoring tttprobe - A probe to collect traffic-data and send it to a viewer tttview- A graphical viewer for remote c

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Zak B. Elep
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:48 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:22 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > Okay, please report it against CDBS. > > I have, waiting for the ticket. Its Debian Bug #543916. In the meantime, I've uploaded 0.8.0-4 building with the workaround (declaring DE

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:52:43 +0300, George Danchev написа: > But those diffs are applied in a combined fashion to the upstream source > (not very helpful for people actually interested to understand the > code), while they might be extremely interested to understand how many > *logical* changes hav

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Zak B. Elep
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:22 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Zak B. Elep schrieb: > > Hmm, I built that package earlier today and it was fine (both in and out > > cowbuilder.) I noticed a new CDBS version up just now and upgraded, and > > now I get the same result as above, confirming the FTBFS. W

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zak B. Elep schrieb: > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 13:46 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Your build ftbfs: >> /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools-files.mk:49: *** insufficient number >> of arguments (1) to function `if'. Stop. >> dpkg-buildpackage: error: de

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Zak B. Elep
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 13:46 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Your build ftbfs: > /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools-files.mk:49: *** insufficient number > of arguments (1) to function `if'. Stop. > dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 > E: Failed autobuilding of pack

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zak B. Elep schrieb: > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 08:36 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote: >> Thanks, all in all, that was a better take on why separate patching >> should be done. I'll take a look at topgit (and quilt, too) and will >> probably rebuild the package

Re: how to upload a debian binary for lyx

2009-08-27 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
[ Keeping full quote for added Cc: ] [ Keeping you in copy, since I assume to don't read the mentors list ] Hi Bela! There's a team maintaining the lyx package. You can reach it by e-mail via Debian LyX Maintainers . Please ask them if you can help them / join their team. Best Regards, Alexa

Re: Bug#543741: ettercap: should this package be orphaned?

2009-08-27 Thread Murat Demirten
I mean taking required action when I refer to close bugs. 2009/8/27 Sandro Tosi > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:25, Murat Demirten wrote: > > I'm planning to close all bugs related to ettercap. Ettercap authors > don't > > work on this project anymore > > Why would you close bugs (I suppose Debian

Re: Bug#543843: gqview -- simple image viewer using GTK+

2009-08-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michal Čihař [2009.08.27.1224 +0200]: > Please note that there is geeqie, which took gqview code and now > provides active upstream for it. There is also pending patch for > geeqie package to provide gqview, which we will integrate once geeqie > will get out of beta phase. And then it

Re: how to upload a debian binary for lyx

2009-08-27 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
You want the debian-mentors list. Setting Mail-Followup-To and keeping the full text below. Please upload your package somewhere for the mentors to review, and drop the other lists when you reply. On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:24:47AM +0100, belahcene wrote: > Hi, > > I generate a debian package for

Re: Bug#543843: gqview -- simple image viewer using GTK+

2009-08-27 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:48:57 +0200 martin f krafft napsal(a): > also sprach Daniel Baumann [2009.08.27.0944 +0200]: > > I am orphaning gqview. > > > > Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this > > package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it

Re: Bug#543843: gqview -- simple image viewer using GTK+

2009-08-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Daniel Baumann [2009.08.27.0944 +0200]: > I am orphaning gqview. > > Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this > package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it. I'd be willing to sponsor anyone who will take up maintenance of this packag

Re: Bug#543825: acct -- The GNU Accounting utilities for process and login accounting

2009-08-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Daniel Baumann [2009.08.27.0931 +0200]: > I am orphaning acct. > > Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this > package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it. I'd be willing to sponsor anyone who will dedicate to maintaining acct. --

Re: Bug#543741: ettercap: should this package be orphaned?

2009-08-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:25, Murat Demirten wrote: > I'm planning to close all bugs related to ettercap. Ettercap authors don't > work on this project anymore Why would you close bugs (I suppose Debian ones) if they are still valid? > but it is good to have this package at least a few years mor

Re: Bug#543741: ettercap: should this package be orphaned?

2009-08-27 Thread Zak B. Elep
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 10:48 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > *If* this package becomes orphaned, I'll happily sponsor someone willing to > maintain it. Maybe there's someone on debian-mentors who would be willing to > adopt it if it's orphaned. Any volunteers? I'm taking a look at it, although e

Re: Bug#543741: ettercap: should this package be orphaned?

2009-08-27 Thread Murat Demirten
I'm planning to close all bugs related to ettercap. Ettercap authors don't work on this project anymore but it is good to have this package at least a few years more, it runs very well on most scenario. 2009/8/27 Andreas Henriksson > Hello Lucas! > > Adding debian-mentors list to the discussion.

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Zak B. Elep
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 11:52 +0300, George Danchev wrote: > Quoting "Zak B. Elep" : > > Wait, a giant budget excluding a non-internetworked environment? Then > > again, with the government where I come from, its not too far off to > > imagine that. :P > > It simply boils down to the (strange) secu

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Zak B. Elep" : Hi, On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 20:49 +0200, George Danchev wrote: Nice argumentation, but not bullet proof ;-) Was never really an argument. Remember that I did use separate patching in the previous version (if you read my response in the other thread I made it quite clea

Re: Bug#543741: ettercap: should this package be orphaned?

2009-08-27 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Lucas! Adding debian-mentors list to the discussion... On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 06:28:29PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: ettercap [...] > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that > should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: [...] > [ To Andrea

RFS: logiweb

2009-08-27 Thread Klaus Grue
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logiweb". * Package name: logiweb Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Klaus Grue * URL : http://logiweb.eu/doc/0.2.0/download/debian.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : a syst

Re: RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.2 (Lenny security bug fixes)

2009-08-27 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Hi Ben, Ben Finney ha scritto: > Ben Finney writes: > >> The debdiff against the version currently in Lenny is online at >> http://paste.debian.net/45120/>. > > The syntax highlighter at that site is munging the display of some > characters. (I've reported this issue to the site maintainer.) Th