Hi,
are .mo file considered source, i.e. is an upstream tarball containing
.mo files ok?
Or is it necessary to have .po files?
If .po files are necessary, but available only via Mercurial, should I
get the source from SCM, remove the .hg* file and repackage it?
Thanks,
Ludovico
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Ludovico
Cavedonludovico.cave...@gmail.com wrote:
are .mo file considered source, i.e. is an upstream tarball containing
.mo files ok?
Or is it necessary to have .po files?
If .po files are necessary, but available only via Mercurial, should I
get the
Dear mentors,
I'm still looking for a sponsor for my package oval-interpreter.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Pavel
Vinogradovpavel.vinogra...@nixdev.net wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.5.25-1 of my package
oval-interpreter.
It builds these binary
On 2009-09-02 08:08 +0200, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
Hi,
are .mo file considered source, i.e. is an upstream tarball containing
.mo files ok?
Yes and no. They are not source, but shipping them is perfectly fine as
long as you also ship the .po files. If you don't modify the .po files,
you can
Il giorno mer, 02/09/2009 alle 14.12 +0800, Paul Wise ha scritto:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Ludovico
Cavedonludovico.cave...@gmail.com wrote:
are .mo file considered source, i.e. is an upstream tarball containing
.mo files ok?
Or is it necessary to have .po files?
If .po
Hi,
One of my packages, gforth, is having a weird FTBFS on hppa and
a not-so-weird FTBFS on s390. A couple of weeks ago I asked here
about help with a mips/mipsel problem, and two people kindly pointed
out qemu as a way to (slowly, but still something) test things on
different architectures.
Hi.
IANADD and have not seen the package, but something has bugged me once
when I was looking for some terminal programs:
On Sep 02 2009, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Description: an VTE based super lightweight terminal emulator
Shouldn't the field start with a
Hi.
On Aug 29 2009, Rogério Brito wrote:
I just updated the package mondo and this fixes an RC bug.
This was kindly sponsored by Li Daobing.
Thanks, Rogério Brito.
--
Rogério Brito : rbr...@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8
http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito :
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:06:48 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Description: an VTE based super lightweight terminal emulator
Shouldn't the field start with a VTE... instead?
Actually it should start without an article :)
Short descriptions are supposed to work as noun phrases or is a
phrase, i.e.
Hi, Hideki.
On Sep 01 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:29:44 -0300
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote:
Architectures: all [! kfreebsd-i386, ! kfreebsd-amd64, ! hurd-i386]
^^^any?
Yes, of course.
That's what I want! What is needed to do so? Who can do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.3-1
of my package abr2gbr.
It builds these binary packages:
abr2gbr- Converts PhotoShop brushes to GIMP
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.34-2 of my new package
of windowlab. It builds this binary package:
windowlab - Small and simple Amiga-like window manager
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package iceweasel-useragentswitcher.
* Package name: iceweasel-useragentswitcher
Version : 0.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Chris Pederick moz...@chrispederick.com
* URL : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/59
*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gerix-wifi-cracker-ng.
* Package name: gerix-wifi-cracker-ng
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Emanuele Gentili
* URL : http://backtrack.it/~emgent/
* License
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dojo.
* Package name: dojo
Version : 1.3.2-1
Upstream Author : Alex Russell a...@dojotoolkit.org
* URL : http://dojotoolkit.org
* License : BSD
Section : web
It builds these binary packages:
I'm not a Debian Developer, but I have the impression I was able to
compile perfectly your package without the need to install python-dev...
which indeed is not needed by ordinary _python_ programs, but only by
(C) extensions.
So I think you could remove the unnecessary python-dev from
I don't pretend to be a packaging guru, but I have the slight impression
that your package is lintian clean thanks to some bug in lintian:
- version is 1.0.0 ... and it is not a native package. But moreover, it
seems like on the original page (which is
2009/9/2 Pietro Battiston too...@email.it:
- if I was in you (and though I'm Italian!), I'd make some huge pressure
on upstream to ask translation of README-DEV and changelog (and, why
not, the funny project page) in English
It is there:
The source package is named dojo and the binary package produced is
named jslib-dojo. This follows the naming scheme used by the other
jslib packages. However, if the naming policy has changed regarding
these types of packages, I will be more than happy to oblige.
Please let me know, thank you.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kartik Mistry wrote:
2009/9/2 Pietro Battiston too...@email.it:
- if I was in you (and though I'm Italian!), I'd make some huge pressure
on upstream to ask translation of README-DEV and changelog (and, why
not, the funny project page) in English
Hi,
please name your package
libjs-dojo
Regards,
Jérémy Lal.
On 02/09/2009 16:33, Jason Morawski wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dojo.
* Package name: dojo
Version : 1.3.2-1
Upstream Author : Alex Russella...@dojotoolkit.org
* URL
You are totally correct, I can't believe I overlooked that. Also, with
regards to the chmod line in rules, I mainly added that to remove the
lintian warning that was produced. Should I instead supply a lintian
override?
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 17:41 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
You just mixed up jslib
Jason Morawski a écrit :
The source package is named dojo and the binary package produced is
named jslib-dojo. This follows the naming scheme used by the other
jslib packages. However, if the naming policy has changed regarding
these types of packages, I will be more than happy to oblige.
You just mixed up jslib and libjs.
There are no package name starting with jslib.
They all start with libjs :
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libjs
On 02/09/2009 17:37, Jason Morawski wrote:
The source package is named dojo and the binary package produced is
named jslib-dojo. This
On 02/09/2009 17:46, Jason Morawski wrote:
You are totally correct, I can't believe I overlooked that. Also, with
regards to the chmod line in rules, I mainly added that to remove the
lintian warning that was produced. Should I instead supply a lintian
override?
the trouble is the place of the
Quoting Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net:
Hi,
One of my packages, gforth, is having a weird FTBFS on hppa and
a not-so-weird FTBFS on s390.
for hppa assistance you may want to get in touch with these people:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2009/09/msg6.html
gforth was mentioned at the
Hello,
This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some debian packages,
and would like to put them onto a personal package repository so that I can
include them in a liveCD I maintain.
Is there somewhere I can create/maintain such a repository without putting
these packages into
Hello,
As a maintainer of a LiveCD, I have built the cd based on lenny 5.0.2, and want
to stay with that as my base system, however, there are several packages I
would like to be able to pull from sid/squeeze. I realize these are not
stable packages, but they are stable enough for my purposes.
I demand that gregor herrmann may or may not have written...
[snip]
In this case VTE based super lightweight terminal emulator or maybe
lightweight terminal emulator based on VTE might work.
The latter's fine, IMO, but the former should be VTE-based
[snip]
--
| Darren Salt|
Also please note that
/usr/share/javascript
will be accessible on the web server, e.g.
http://localhost/javascript
so in your debian/rules :
chmod +x
debian/jslib-dojo/usr/share/javascript/dojo/dojox/storage/buildFlashStorage.sh
might be a bad place and idea.
Regards.
Jérémy.
On 02/09/2009
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Raikes schrieb:
Hello,
As a maintainer of a LiveCD, I have built the cd based on lenny 5.0.2, and
want to stay with that as my base system, however, there are several packages
I would like to be able to pull from sid/squeeze. I realize
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:19:15 -0700, Don Raikes wrote:
This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some debian
packages, and would like to put them onto a personal package
repository so that I can include them in a liveCD I maintain.
You can create your own repo with mini-dinstall
2009-09-02, gregor herrmann:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:19:15 -0700, Don Raikes wrote:
This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some debian
packages, and would like to put them onto a personal package
repository so that I can include them in a liveCD I maintain.
You can
Pietro Battiston wrote:
I don't pretend to be a packaging guru, but I have the slight impression
that your package is lintian clean thanks to some bug in lintian:
- version is 1.0.0 ... and it is not a native package. But moreover, it
seems like on the original page (which is
Sven Joachim wrote:
Yes. And try to convince upstream to ship the .po files in their
tarballs.
Clear, thank you all,
Ludovico
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Updated package has been uploaded to mentors.
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 18:03 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 02/09/2009 17:46, Jason Morawski wrote:
You are totally correct, I can't believe I overlooked that. Also, with
regards to the chmod line in rules, I mainly added that to remove the
lintian
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:19:15AM -0700, Don Raikes wrote:
This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some
debian packages, and would like to put them onto a personal
package repository so that I can include them in a liveCD I
maintain.
[...]
I do this (assumed apt-ftparchive is
Pietro Battiston wrote:
I'm not a Debian Developer, but I have the impression I was able to
compile perfectly your package without the need to install python-dev...
which indeed is not needed by ordinary _python_ programs, but only by
(C) extensions.
So I think you could remove the
Here's some lintian warnings you can take care easily :
W: dojo source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.3)
no comment
W: dojo source: patch-system-but-no-source-readme
Means you need to add a debian/README.source explaining why you needed a patch.
Also i understand that
On Sep 02 2009, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
if i remove python-dev from dependence i have a litian error
N:The package appears to use Python as part of its build process in
N:debian/rules but doesn't depend on Python.
Do you need python or python-dev? Perhaps just python would work,
2009/9/1 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Thanks.
Thank you! Would you upload poco-doc too?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco-doc/poco-doc_1.3.5-1.dsc
Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1.1+dfsg1-3
of my package anubis.
It builds these binary packages:
anubis - an SMTP message submission daemon
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix FTBFS on ia64 [1].
The package can be found on
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-keyring.
* Package name: python-keyring
Version : 0.1+hg66-1
Upstream Author : Kang Zhang jobo...@gmail.com
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/keyring
* License : PSF (Python Software Foundation
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Sep 02 2009, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
if i remove python-dev from dependence i have a litian error
N:The package appears to use Python as part of its build process in
N:debian/rules but doesn't depend on Python.
Do you need python or python-dev? Perhaps just
Hi
Dne Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:56:21 +0200
Carl Chenet cha...@ohmytux.com napsal(a):
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-keyring.
* Package name: python-keyring
Version : 0.1+hg66-1
Is it really necessary to package some vcs snapshot?
Otherwise the
Sorry to bother, but :
find . -name *.php
./dojox/analytics/logger/dojoxAnalytics.php
./dojox/analytics/logger/JSON.php
./dojox/form/resources/RecieveFile.php
./dojox/form/resources/cLOG.php
./dojox/form/resources/UploadFile.php
./dojox/resources/explore.php
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package jfauth.
* Package name: jfauth
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Avery Pennarun apenw...@gmail.com
* URL : http://github.com/apenwarr/jfauth
* License : GPLv2
Section : net (better suggestions?)
Le jeudi 03 septembre 2009 à 00:02 +0200, Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:56:21 +0200
Carl Chenet cha...@ohmytux.com napsal(a):
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-keyring.
* Package name: python-keyring
Version :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.2-2.1 of
the package nd. It builds these binary packages:
nd --- Tiny little command line WebDAV interface
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix this bug: 408084
The package can be found on
I think that some of these files should go
in /usr/share/doc/libjs-dojo-dojox/examples and others should be
excluded from the package.
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 23:50 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Sorry to bother, but :
find . -name *.php
./dojox/analytics/logger/dojoxAnalytics.php
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gregor herrmann wrote:
In this case VTE based super lightweight terminal emulator or maybe
lightweight terminal emulator based on VTE might work.
Rogério Brito wrote:
Now, the point with the problem: it is not, from a user's perspective,
clear
51 matches
Mail list logo
