On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:05:55AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > On 2009-09-07 12:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> >> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
> >
> > Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
>
> As Neil would have poi
On 2009-09-08 06:05 +0200, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2009-09-07 12:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>>> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
>>
>> Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
>
> As Neil would have pointed out if he were s
Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-09-07 12:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
>
> Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
As Neil would have pointed out if he were still subscribed to -mentors,
DEB_BUILD_* is almost always th
Hello Jeffrey,
Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.1-1
> of my package "ocropus".
Here's my review:
- debian/copyright: you don't need list the files with the same license but
with different copyright years into the different clauses,
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wixi".
Package name: wixi
Version : 1.09-1
Upstream Author : Kees Remmelzwaal
URL : http://wixi.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL >=2
Section : utils
It builds these binary packages:
wixi
Hello Alice,
Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.3-1
> of my package "abr2gbr".
Here's my review:
- I didn't see 1.0.3 version on upstream site;
- debian/compat: 'dpkg-source: warning: file abr2gbr-1.0.3/debian/compat has
no final newline
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "srcml".
* Package name: srcml
Version : 20061109
Upstream Author : Dr. Michael Collard
* URL : http://www.sdml.info/projects/srcml/
* License : GPL
Section : utils
It builds these binary package
Hi, Damien.
On Sep 07 2009, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Faifa is a network tool to configure, inspect
> flash, collect statistics on HomePlug 1.0/AV
> devices.
> .
> It sends all private and public ethernet management
> frames to the devices.
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> faifa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "faifa".
* Package name: faifa
Version : 0.2~svn41-1
Upstream Author : Xavier Carcelle
Florian Fainelli
Nicolas Thill
* URL : https://dev.open-plc.org/
* License
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 03:09:55PM -0300, Mauro Lizaur wrote:
> 2009-09-02, gregor herrmann:
>
> > On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:19:15 -0700, Don Raikes wrote:
> >
> > > This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some debian
> > > packages, and would like to put them onto a personal package
Hello mentors,
I am preparing package of library lv2dynparam1.
http://download.gna.org/lv2dynparam/
My problem is that source actually building two libraries:
liblv2dynparamhost1-1
liblv2dynparamplugin1-0
If make just two packages liblv2dynparam1 and liblv2dynparam1-dev then I have
this warnin
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
>> Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
>
> Cool, the version in unstable is the key.
This is nice, indeed.
$ dpkg-architecture -qD
I've updated the package to the new upstream version 2009.1.2.
> I've updated the package to the new upstream version 2009.1.1.
>
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php-ezcomponents".
> >
> > * Package name: php-ezcomponents
> > Version : 2009.1-1
>
* George Danchev , 2009-09-05, 11:40:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvigraimpex/libvigraimpex_1.6.0-2.dsc
[...]
Unfortunately, I will get a chance to work on that package possibly during the
next weekend, since I'm currently busy taking care of nasty RC-bugs in some of
my packa
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
>
> Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
Cool, the version in unstable is the key.
Thanks for the hint
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Klarmach
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 10:50:54AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> I guess that you're looking for:
>
>dpkg --print-architecture
No. The result is equivalent to
dpkg-architecture | grep -w DEB_BUILD_ARCH
I'm locking for something that responds with 0 for 32 bit architectures
and 1 for 64 b
On 2009-09-07 12:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
On 2009-09-07 12:32 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the new version of arb I want to package requires to set a variable
>
>ARB_64=0/11=>compile 64 bit version
>
> to specify whether it will be compiled on 32 or 64 bit architecture. Is
> there any safe way to set this variabl
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:32:27 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
Hello Andreas :)
> the new version of arb I want to package requires to set a variable
>
>ARB_64=0/11=>compile 64 bit version
>
> to specify whether it will be compiled on 32 or 64 bit architecture. Is
> there any s
Hi,
the new version of arb I want to package requires to set a variable
ARB_64=0/11=>compile 64 bit version
to specify whether it will be compiled on 32 or 64 bit architecture. Is
there any safe way to set this variable automatically from environment?
I expected dpkg-architecture
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> > Yes peter I do agree but this package is maintained in a git clone
> > repository and not a upstream website and the rules file already has the
> > upstream target based on git clone
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> Yes peter I do agree but this package is maintained in a git clone
> repository and not a upstream website and the rules file already has the
> upstream target based on git clone repo..
Add dummy debian/watch file explaining this.
> Here
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2009-09-06, Rogério Brito wrote:
>>> - I doubt that many sponsors will be happy DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
>>>on a NEW package.
>> While I understand that you mentioned this regarding a NEW package, I'm
>> a slightly bit confused about the "best current practices"
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Isn't the watch file also useful for keeping track of the packages
> using the Debian External Health System - http://qa.debian.org/ ?
> I personally find it very, very useful for the packages I maintain -
> keeping my developer QA page alwa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.04-3
of my package "ttf-staypuft".
It builds these binary packages:
ttf-staypuft - The Stay-Puft free TrueType font
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 454082, 521501
The package can be found o
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.01-7
of my package "ttf-isabella".
It builds these binary packages:
ttf-isabella - The Isabella free TrueType font
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 521502
The package can be found on mentors
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:11:21AM +0100, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Kartik Mistry wrote:
>
> > Some points:
>
> + There are couple of Lintian info/messages you may want to fix.
> >
>
> There is already upstream target in rules file (apt-get orig-source) and I
>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.31.1-15
of my package "autotrace".
It builds these binary packages:
autotrace - bitmap to vector graphics converter
libautotrace-dev - bitmap to vector graphics converter, development files
libautotrace3 - bitmap to vector graphics c
28 matches
Mail list logo
