Re: A few questions after my first upload (sponsored)

2010-01-11 Thread Ben Finney
Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au writes: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:22:19 +0100 Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote: When building/uploading packages for unstable, you *must* use an unstable environment (including lintian). If you're running testing on your machine, then the build/verification

Re: A few questions after my first upload (sponsored)

2010-01-11 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: For such a package, you must build and test using the latest packages from Debian ‘unstable’ suite (== ‘sid’), and nothing else suffices. This of course is relative to whichever suite of Debian one is uploading the package to. If one is uploading

Re: A few questions after my first upload (sponsored)

2010-01-11 Thread Reinier Haasjes
Hi, Christoph Egger wrote: At Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:57:14 +0100, [...] Regards Christoph Thanks for all the answers. And everybody else (include Christoph) thanks for pointing out that I should use unstable/sid for developing. This isn't a problem because I'm using a virtual

Re: A few questions after my first upload (sponsored)

2010-01-11 Thread Karl Goetz
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:25:30 +0800 Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote: I assume when you say 'unstable environment' you don't exclude the possibility of using a backported lintian on (say) stable. I'd specifically exclude

Re: A few questions after my first upload (sponsored)

2010-01-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote: I was thinking of a case where the package is built in a sid pbuilder (I should probably have clarified that). Ah, ok. Sadly testing it only has one option - run sid :/ Strictly speaking you should test on whatever

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

2010-01-11 Thread Michal Čihař
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:42:49 +0200 Nanakos Chrysostomos nana...@wired-net.gr napsal(a): - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpg321/mpg321_0.2.11-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Help is

Re: RFS: ITA of giflib

2010-01-11 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:15:58 +0100 Thibaut GRIDEL tgri...@free.fr napsal(a): I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1.6-9 of orphaned package giflib. It closes ITA #543841 which I updated earlier this week-end. It builds these binary packages: giflib-dbg - library for GIF

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

2010-01-11 Thread Michal Čihař
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:50:36 +0100 Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org napsal(a): - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpg321/mpg321_0.2.11-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Help is appreciated

RFS: graphy (2nd try)

2010-01-11 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Hello mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package graphy. * Package name: graphy Version : 1.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Google Inc. * URL : http://code.google.com/p/graphy/ * License : Apache-2.0 Section : python It builds these binary packages:

RFS: namebench (2nd try)

2010-01-11 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Hello mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package namebench. * Package name: namebench Version : 1.1+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Thomas R. Stromberg thomas.r.stromb...@google.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/namebench/ * License : Apache-2.0 Section

Re: RFS: ITA of giflib

2010-01-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org wrote: Also please don't write your surname in capitals, I see no reason for that. There was a short conversation about this practice on pkg-fonts-devel and planet.d.o recently:

Re: RFS: easymp3gain

2010-01-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi again! Bug #563236 has been fixed, easyMp3Gain should build now. Regards Matthias Klumpp The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/easymp3gain - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib

Re: RFS: easymp3gain

2010-01-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi again! Bug #563236 has been fixed, easyMp3Gain should build now. Regards Matthias Klumpp The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/easymp3gain - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib

Re: RFS: easymp3gain

2010-01-11 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthias Klumpp schrieb: Hi again! Bug #563236 has been fixed, easyMp3Gain should build now. Regards Matthias Klumpp The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/easymp3gain - Source

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

2010-01-11 Thread Nanakos Chrysostomos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/1/2010 17:02, Michal Čihař wrote: Hi Dne Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:50:36 +0100 Michal ihaY ni...@debian.org napsal(a): - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpg321/mpg321_0.2.11-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded

Re: RFS: easymp3gain

2010-01-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! P: easymp3gain source: source-contains-svn-control-dir lang/.svn - - Just notify and punch upstream, to remove the .svn dirs with his next release tarballs prop. Woops! Why wasn't this information shown to mee too? Maybe I should update my lintian... W: easymp3gain-gtk:

Re: RFS: easymp3gain

2010-01-11 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, Mattias. On Jan 11 2010, Matthias Klumpp wrote: easyMp3Gain is a GUI application, it does not have any command line arguments. Then, please just state it for people using the manpages. The first thing that I do when I get a new package is to look at the manpage of the main executable.

Re: RFS: easymp3gain

2010-01-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:28:55 -0200, Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote: Hi, Mattias. On Jan 11 2010, Matthias Klumpp wrote: easyMp3Gain is a GUI application, it does not have any command line arguments. Then, please just state it for people using the manpages. The first thing

RFS: tesseract-eng (updated package)

2010-01-11 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.00-2 of my package tesseract-eng. It builds these binary packages: tesseract-ocr-eng - tesseract-ocr language files for English text The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 562195 The package can

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

2010-01-11 Thread Barry deFreese
Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, debian/changelog fixed. debian/watch file added. That piece of code was there from 0.2.10.3 version, my mistake. Now uses postinst from 0.2.10.6 (the latest one). Uploaded again in mentors website [0]. Thanks, Chris. [0]:

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

2010-01-11 Thread Nanakos Chrysostomos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/1/2010 23:48, Barry deFreese wrote: Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, debian/changelog fixed. debian/watch file added. That piece of code was there from 0.2.10.3 version, my mistake. Now uses postinst from 0.2.10.6 (the latest one).

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

2010-01-11 Thread Nanakos Chrysostomos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/1/2010 23:48, Barry deFreese wrote: Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, debian/changelog fixed. debian/watch file added. That piece of code was there from 0.2.10.3 version, my mistake. Now uses postinst from 0.2.10.6 (the latest one).

Re: original package changelogs

2010-01-11 Thread Tim Retout
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 14:00 +, Seger, Mark wrote: Is there any standard (or desired format). Since I intend to include both my release notes and an automatically generated changelog, it should be pretty easy to create the log headers in any format people would like to see. As an

Re: RFS: collectl

2010-01-11 Thread Tim Retout
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 09:43 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Bernd Schubert bernd.schub...@fastmail.fm wrote: Lintian -pendantic complains with: I: collectl source: build-depends-without-arch-dep bash ... I'm not sure what to do about the new

RFS: acetoneiso

2010-01-11 Thread Nick Andrik
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package acetoneiso. * Package name: acetoneiso Version : 2.2.1-0ubuntu1 Upstream Author : Fabrizio Di Marco and Marco Di Antonio * URL : http://www.acetoneteam.org/ * License : GPLv3 Section : otherosfs

RFS: gracie 0.2.10-2

2010-01-11 Thread Ben Finney
Howdy mentors, I am seeking a sponsor for release 0.2.10-2 of my package, ‘gracie’. It builds the following binary package: gracie - OpenID server for local PAM accounts This release fixes the following bugs: 519623 557089 It also updates the source package format to “3.0 (quilt)”.

Re: RFS: collectl

2010-01-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk writes: This is correct; however, having read bug #552200, I'm not yet personally convinced that it deserved to be removed. If the package later added some arch-dependent binary packages, it would be nice to be consistent. The basic problem is that while there's

Re: RFS: collectl

2010-01-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: The basic problem is that while there's potentially some use to the idea of separating out architecture-independent build requirements, Lintian wasn't really checking that.  In order to support this, you have to very

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

2010-01-11 Thread Barry deFreese
Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: On 11/1/2010 23:48, Barry deFreese wrote: Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, debian/changelog fixed. debian/watch file added. That piece of code was there from 0.2.10.3 version, my mistake. Now uses postinst from 0.2.10.6 (the latest one). Uploaded again in

Re: RFS: collectl

2010-01-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: The basic problem is that while there's potentially some use to the idea of separating out architecture-independent build requirements, Lintian wasn't really checking that.  In order to

Re: RFS: collectl

2010-01-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Doesn't that break regular builds?  Or does calling the binary target then clean it up by going back to run build-indep? The in mapserver back then binary-indep/install-indep targets depended on build-indep and the buildds

Re: RFS: collectl

2010-01-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: When that change occurs, there will be 2 kinds of buildds; the one that builds the arch all and arch any packages and the ones that builds. These will obviously be different for different packages, I imagine the fastest arches will be chosen for the

Re: RFS: collectl

2010-01-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Hm, isn't the obvious and simple way of implementing this change to just create a second class of buildds that do exactly what the current ones do but then throw out all the arch-dependent packages and only keep the