RFS: joystick (updated package)

2010-04-07 Thread Stephen Kitt
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20051019-10 of my package joystick. It builds these binary packages: evtest - utility to monitor input device events inputattach - utility to connect serial-attached peripherals to the input subsystem joystick - set of testing

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper

2010-04-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 05 Apr 2010, Osamu Aoki wrote: On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:30:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: The commands listed below are run twice, once with the -a option (in binary-arch) and once with the -i option (in binary-indep): Actually, it doesn't. dh binary just runs whatever

RFS: nall

2010-04-07 Thread Benoît Rouits
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nall. * Package name: nall Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Benoît Rouits brou...@free.fr * URL : http://herewe.servebeer.com/nall/ * License : gpl Section : x11 It builds these binary

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper

2010-04-07 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:21:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: And if one wanted to be picky, you could note that the sequence for binary-indep does not include dh_strip, dh_makeshlibs and dh_shlibdeps. Good points. FEW files missing in the following chapter are: NEWS TODO Also .ex

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper

2010-04-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Osamu Aoki wrote: What is needed is documentation on dh_listpackages and its usage to sort out binary-indep and binary-arch difference for override commands. Otherwise, buildd may fail if they only install Build-Depends: (I vaguely remember, they install

RFS: mbuffer (updated package, DMUA candidate)

2010-04-07 Thread Peter Pentchev
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20100327-1 of my package mbuffer. This is a new upstream release with several Debian packaging updates (see below for the full changelog entry). Also, I'd be grateful if a kind mentor would set the DM-Upload-Allowed flag before

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper

2010-04-07 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 02:57:41PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Osamu Aoki wrote: What is needed is documentation on dh_listpackages and its usage to sort out binary-indep and binary-arch difference for override commands. Otherwise, buildd may fail if they only

Re: RFS: mbuffer (updated package, DMUA candidate)

2010-04-07 Thread Hector Oron
Hi, [...] I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Done. (c: It's been a pleasure to work with you and I hope you become DD ASAP. :-) Cheers, -- Héctor Orón Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar System, which one day will disconnect us. --

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper

2010-04-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Osamu Aoki wrote: But are you sure this holds for dh_auto_build. If buildd only install Build-Depends and dh_auto_build initiate doc building using latex listed in -indep, then we are in trouble. As I understand, it usually run $(MAKE) for any case. So if doc package

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper (still confused)

2010-04-07 Thread jmroth+deb
Guys, I am still confused about my initial question when which binary-* target in debian/rules is called. This also concerns: - http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-dreq.en.html#s-rules - http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules which seem to be out of sync. The

Re: RFS: django-auth-ldap

2010-04-07 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 08:19:10PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:39:09PM +0200, Fladischer Michael wrote: [actually, Christoph Egger wrote...] * I've found it quite good to have package + packaging under the same license. Of course that's totally up to your

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper (still confused)

2010-04-07 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:19:33PM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote: Guys, I am still confused about my initial question when which binary-* target in debian/rules is called. Very simple: binary-arch to build all arch-dependent packages from that source and binary-indep to build all

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper

2010-04-07 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:24:44PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: And it's a know limitation of dpkg-buildpackage that we have only debian/rules build when we should have build-arch and build-indep just like for binary. OK. Somehow I was expecting too much. I now reread that section of

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper (still confused)

2010-04-07 Thread jmroth+deb
I am still confused about my initial question when which binary-* target in debian/rules is called. Very simple: binary-arch to build all arch-dependent packages from that source and binary-indep to build all arch-independent packages. The binary target should then depend on binary-arch and

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper (still confused)

2010-04-07 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:13:25PM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote: I am still confused about my initial question when which binary-* target in debian/rules is called. Very simple: binary-arch to build all arch-dependent packages from that source and binary-indep to build all

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: ttf-takao (NEW)

2010-04-07 Thread Jun Kobayashi
Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Jun Kobayashi (jk...@ubuntu.com): If OK, then feel free to provide us with your login on alioth.debian.org (of course, create one if you don't have one already). To answer another question of yours in this thread, the source and patches for otf-ipafont can

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper (still confused)

2010-04-07 Thread Russ Allbery
jmroth+...@iip.lu writes: Yeah but I was talking about a debian/rules like binary-indep: cmd1 cmd2 %: dh $@ Here, you can be sure that binary-indep is ignored. It's not if you explicitly do an architecture-independent build with dpkg-buildpackage -A. But if you do a

Re: RFS: ttf-takao (NEW)

2010-04-07 Thread Jun Kobayashi
Hideki Yamane wrote: I met some IPA folks at Red Hat Tokyo and talked some time ago, I wished Please use open ticket system and forum or mailing list. If you think it is huge task for you, please use sourceforge.jp. Release often more and more to them. And, now they act on

RFS: conquest

2010-04-07 Thread Jonathon
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package conquest. * Package name: conquest Version : 8.4.1i-1 Upstream Author : Jon Trulson j...@radscan.com * URL : http://www.radscan.com/conquest.html * License : Artistic (contained at

Deleting files from .orig on unpack?

2010-04-07 Thread Jonathan Niehof
I'm working with a package where upstream uses a flat Makefile and the Debian package has been converted to automake. This means the Makefile from the .orig.tar.gz gets clobbered in the build process, and then removed entirely on clean. So build; clean isn't a no-op. I see several ways to deal

RFS: libspring-ldap-java

2010-04-07 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Hi mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libspring-ldap-java. * Package name: libspring-ldap-java Version : 1.3.0.RELEASE-1 Upstream Author : SpringSource Inc. * URL : http://www.springsource.org/ldap * License : Apache-2.0 Section :

Re: Deleting files from .orig on unpack?

2010-04-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Jonathan Niehof jtnie...@gmail.com wrote: Suggestions on the best approach (or a 5?) Upstream seems dormant, so convincing them to switch to automake is probably not on the agenda. If it is a sf.net project there is a procedure to take over the project. If it is

Re: RFS: conquest

2010-04-07 Thread Paul Wise
You don't seem to have joined the Debian Games Team and updated the SVN repository. I'd suggest joining the Debian Games Team, you will find sponsors and testers there. In exchange, we would hope you could help maintain other games in Debian. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise --