Re: RFS: notorious-women

Sorry for the damage caused by my message about the package being "sexist". I just wished to point out this to you, since I very well know that, in order to get packages accepted in Debian, the package name must be well-formed. Just take the case of my package gnome-media-player. I submitted the R

Re: RFS: notorious-women

On 06/17/2010 11:21 PM, benoît tuduri wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "notorious-women". The last time you sent this, Joachim Reichel said: [1] > Why is this a separate package at all? Have you contacted the fortunes-fr > maintainer and asked him to include t

RFS: luma (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am the maintainer of "luma", looking for a new sponsor. My current sponsor (mornfall) told me that he is very busy and that I should look for a more responsive one. It builds these binary packages: luma - gui utility for accessing and managing LDAP database The package app

Re: RFS: notorious-women

Hi, Benoît, On Jun 18 2010, benoît tuduri wrote: > I launched to build my package the debuild command in a command line. > The only errors which are reported for my last upload are : > W: notorious-women: new-package-should-close-itp-bug > W: notorious-women: wrong-bug-number-in-closes l3:# >

Re: RFS: notorious-women

Bilal Akhtar writes: > Isn't this a sexist package? Yes, by definition: it discriminates on the basis of sex. There's nothing wrong with discrimination as such; any act of choosing is an act of discrimination. The more interesting question is: Is it unfairly sexist? I don't think so; it's mere

Re: RFS: notorious-women

Hello, Thanks you for your answer. I discovered this mailing list recently because i not see some references on it on mentors.debian.net website. So, I'm working on ubuntu system. Some errors/warning errors are not to be strict. I chrooted a debian sid with debootstrap to be able to notice theses

Re: RFS: notorious-women

On Thursday 17 June 2010 12:51:47 benoît tuduri wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "notorious-women". There have been a number of replies each time you sent this message. Perhaps you are not receiving them. I am CC'ing you on this reply, in case you are not s

Re: RFS: notorious-women

Hi Benoît, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "notorious-women". > > * Package name: notorious-women [...] since this is the third RFS message for this package and most issues pointed out in the initial reply haven't been addressed: When you post repeated RFS messages, can you plea

Re: RFS: notorious-women

On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:16:08 Bilal Akhtar wrote: > Isn't this a sexist package? Sexist against women? Maybe. At the very least, "notorious" has a had a negative denotaion since the 1600s, and probably shouldn't be applied without good justification. I'd prefer a more neutral or positive

RFS: egroupware (fixes critical bug)

Dear Mentors, we are looking for a sponsor for the packages egroupware and egroupware-egw-pear. EGroupware (www.egroupware.org) is a groupware server written in PHP. Beside a web interface it also supports SyncML, CalDAV and CardDAV. EGroupware was part of Debian since it's foundation in 2003: h

Re: RFS: notorious-women

Isn't this a sexist package? Just my 2 cents, Bilal Akhtar. On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 19:51 +0200, benoît tuduri wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "notorious-women". > > * Package name: notorious-women > Version : 0.1-1 > Upstream Author : TUDURI B

RFS: notorious-women

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "notorious-women". * Package name: notorious-women Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : TUDURI Benoît * URL : * License : Creative Commons Attribution

[uploaded] RFS: nc6 (updated package)

Am 16.06.2010 22:17, schrieb Guillaume Delacour: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0-6 > of my package "nc6". Uploaded. Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@

Re: RFS: sunpinyin -- An input method engine for Simplified Chinese

2010/3/27 Kov Chai : > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sunpinyin". > Hi, Kov, Are you still working on sunpinyin ? Thanks, -- Liang Guo http://bluestone.cublog.cn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info (updated package)

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > I was curious to see if I could find any issues since Kartik had no > comment on the upload at all. Agree with all points! Thanks Paul. -- Cheers, Kartik Mistry Debian GNU/Linux Developer 0xD1028C8D | Identica: @kartikm | IRC: kart_ Blo

Re: RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info (updated package)

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Kartik Mistry wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Bhavani Shankar R > wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20100616-1 > >> of my package "mobile-broadband-provider-info". > >> ...

Re: RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info (updated package)

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20100616-1 >> of my package "mobile-broadband-provider-info". >> ... >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mobile-broadband