Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:53:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: 16 packages use it, there should be none. May I ask why ? It should be pretty obvious: less work for Debian and others: less work for ... ... But more work for package maintainers because these redirectors are quite useful to

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man’.

2010-07-14 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 14/07/2010 6.50, Charles Plessy ha scritto: Does anybody know how a more convenient to display a manpage the same way as users will get it by using ‘man’ ? groff -T ascii -man manpage zcat /usr/share/man/manX/XXX | groff -T ascii -m man -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna

Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: But more work for package maintainers because these redirectors are quite useful to keep your watch file simple (and thus less error prone). For me the reasoning to not have a googlecode redirector while having sf and

Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread David Paleino
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:48:52 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: David Paleino wrote: On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:02:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working. Sounds

Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread David Paleino
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:53:20 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org wrote: Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 15:48:52, Raphael Geissert a écrit : http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/ Please do not continue spreading the use of that

Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:31:26AM +0200, David Paleino wrote: If Google changes again, I find it better to change code in one place than in tons of debian/watch files. Well, 16 (+1 in NEW queue now ;-)) are not really tons. IMHO the main advantage of redirectors in general (or equivalently a

Re: Unknown architecture linux-any

2010-07-14 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 14.07.2010 04:09, schrieb Paul Wise: Yes, it seems that it is bug: #582804, but the mentors site does not have an updated lintian version. Always run lintian from sid over your .changes file before uploading to mentors. BTW: As ftp-master uses lintian, too, there's (nearly) always

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man’.

2010-07-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
14.07.2010 09:01, Russ Allbery wrote: [] You can just run man directly on the *roff file, but if you want to stick with the zcat pipeline, just add the -t flag to nroff to say to run the output through the tbl preprocessor first. This is the most close of all suggestions. But even closer is:

Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread David Paleino
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:43:36 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:31:26AM +0200, David Paleino wrote: If Google changes again, I find it better to change code in one place than in tons of debian/watch files. Well, 16 (+1 in NEW queue now ;-)) are not really tons. From

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘ nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man ’.

2010-07-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:57:12AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: Il 14/07/2010 6.50, Charles Plessy ha scritto: Does anybody know how a more convenient to display a manpage the same way as users will get it by using ‘man’ ? groff -T ascii -man manpage zcat /usr/share/man/manX/XXX | groff

Re: RFS: subversion (updated package) [lenny-backports, 1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2]

2010-07-14 Thread Michael Diers
On 2010-07-06 02:58, Michael Diers wrote: On 2010-07-03 05:54, Matt Taggart wrote: Hi Michael, Just a couple comments based on the changelog, I haven't looked at the packages. Matt, thanks a bundle for having a look. subversion (1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2) lenny-backports; urgency=medium

RFS: rsplib-2.7.4 (implementation of the IETF RSerPool framework and example applications)

2010-07-14 Thread Thomas Dreibholz
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package rsplib. RSPLIB is the Open Source implementation (GPLv3) of the IETF's new framework for Reliable Server Pooling (RSerPool), which is described in RFC 5351 to RFC 5356. If you a looking for a Grid compution solution which is simple, easy

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man’.

2010-07-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
14.07.2010 13:14, Roger Leigh wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:57:12AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: Il 14/07/2010 6.50, Charles Plessy ha scritto: Does anybody know how a more convenient to display a manpage the same way as users will get it by using ‘man’ ? groff -T ascii -man manpage

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man’.

2010-07-14 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi Charles, On Wednesday 14 July 2010 06:50:57 Charles Plessy wrote: Dear all, before updating a package, I wanted to look at the new upstream manpage, but realised that ‘nroff -man’ does not produce the same output as ‘man’ itself. Let's take the example of samtools(1) from the samtools

Re: RFS: acetoneiso (updated package)

2010-07-14 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 13.07.2010 19:29, schrieb Nick Andrik: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Many thanks! If you have time, could you please take a look also at this package: myspell-el-gr (I adopted it and updated it after years that had been left)? Package page:

RFS: sisc

2010-07-14 Thread David Banks
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sisc. Package name: sisc Version : 1.16.6-1 Upstream Author : Scott G. Miller sgmil...@gmail.com URL : http://sisc-scheme.org/ License : MPL or GPL-2 Section : interpreters It builds these binary

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man’.

2010-07-14 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Mittwoch, den 14.07.2010, 15:48 +0200 schrieb Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo: On Wednesday 14 July 2010 06:50:57 Charles Plessy wrote: [..] The workaround I found was to copy the new manpage in /tmp/man/man1, and call ‘man -M /tmp/man samtools’. Does anybody know how a more convenient to

Re: RFS: acetoneiso (updated package)

2010-07-14 Thread Nick Andrik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, looks good, uploaded! Thanks again! But you should fix in your next release this one: I: myspell-el-gr: conflicts-with-version openoffice.org (= 1.0.3-2) Just move this from conflicts to breaks. OK, I changed it, it will be ready for

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, On 06/26/2010 05:10 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package zathura. * Package name: zathura Version : 0.6.3-1 Upstream Author : ML m...@pwmt.org * URL :

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Sebastian Ramacher s.ramac...@gmx.at, 2010-07-15, 00:19: I am still looking for a sponsor for zathura. I'd really like to see zathura in Debian, since it offers a nice and minimalistic interface. zathura's main focus is a vim-like interaction and experience. How does zathura compare to

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there, Sebastian. On Jul 15 2010, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: I am still looking for a sponsor for zathura. Unfortunately, I can't sponsor your upload, but the packaging looks fine at a first brief look (I have not yet tried to compile it---I am reading the packaging side of things for the

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/15/2010 12:32 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Sebastian Ramacher s.ramac...@gmx.at, 2010-07-15, 00:19: I am still looking for a sponsor for zathura. I'd really like to see zathura in Debian, since it offers a nice and minimalistic interface.

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On 07/15/2010 12:42 AM, Rogério Brito wrote: I would just suggest that you add a line to the control file putting a Provides: pdf-reader and adding something like the update-mime stuff to register it with the system, so that it is picked up

RFS: mediadownloader

2010-07-14 Thread deimos
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mediadownloader. * Package name: mediadownloader Version : 1.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Marco Bavagnoli lil.dei...@gmail.com * URL : http://googleimagedown.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPLv3 Section

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/15/2010 01:08 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: On 07/15/2010 12:42 AM, Rogério Brito wrote: I would just suggest that you add a line to the control file putting a Provides: pdf-reader and adding something like the update-mime stuff to

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there. On Jul 15 2010, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: I've updated the package. Did I do something wrong here? I got this: , | tmp$ dget -xu http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zathura/zathura_0.0.7-2.dsc | (...) | dget: removing zathura_0.0.7.orig.tar.gz (md5sum does not match) |

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On 07/15/2010 02:23 AM, Rogério Brito wrote: Did I do something wrong here? I got this: , | tmp$ dget -xu http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zathura/zathura_0.0.7-2.dsc | (...) | dget: removing

My pending RFSs (xpdf, ushare, protoaculous, gordon, checksec)

2010-07-14 Thread Michael Gilbert
Hi, I have the following packages currently prepared and am waiting for review by interested sponsors. Some of these have been pending since December 2009). xpdf (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpdf): - I adopted this package a few months ago since it needed a security-minded

Re: RFS: subversion (updated package) [lenny-backports, 1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2]

2010-07-14 Thread Simon Horman
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:24:01PM +0200, Michael Diers wrote: Dear mentors and backporters, here's another attempt at soliciting sponsorship for my update to the Subversion package in lenny-backports. As it stands, the package is a straightforward update to my previous backport