Re: Subject: RFS: testng (updated package)

2010-08-18 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Asheesh Laroia wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.11+dfsg-2 of my package testng. (Still looking BTW...) Have you talked with the Debian Java team about this? If not, take a look at http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/JavaPackaging

RFS: lowpan-tools

2010-08-18 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lowpan-tools. * Package name: lowpan-tools Version : 0.2.2-1 Upstream Authors: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov and Sergey Lapin * URL : http://linux-zigbee.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPLv2 Section :

Re: RFS: poppler (updated package)

2010-08-18 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 05:52:48PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.4-1.2 of my package poppler. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poppler - Source

Re: RFS: poppler (updated package)

2010-08-18 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:03:08 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: Hi, On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 05:52:48PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.4-1.2 of my package poppler. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

Re: RFS: poppler (updated package)

2010-08-18 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:20:23 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:03:08 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: Hi, On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 05:52:48PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.4-1.2 of my package poppler.

dfsg bit in the package name

2010-08-18 Thread Tomasz Muras
Hi Mentors, Is there any preference/reasoning for using any particular symbol that joins dfsg bit with the package name? I can see that different packages use a different format, here are some quick stats from packages in unstable (with the counts): 1179 +dfsg 1119 .dfsg 233 ~dfsg

Re: dfsg bit in the package name

2010-08-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:42:09 +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote: Is there any preference/reasoning for using any particular symbol that joins dfsg bit with the package name? I can see that different packages use a different format, here are some quick stats from packages in unstable (with the counts):

Re: dfsg bit in the package name

2010-08-18 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 18/08/10 18:23, gregor herrmann wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:42:09 +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote: Is there any preference/reasoning for using any particular symbol that joins dfsg bit with the package name? I can see that different packages use a different format, here are some quick stats

Re: Subject: RFS: testng (updated package)

2010-08-18 Thread Varun Hiremath
Hi Marcus, On Mon, 16 Aug, 2010 at 11:06:41AM +0200, Marcus Better wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.11+dfsg-2 of my package testng. It builds these binary packages: testng - testing framework for Java

Re: dfsg bit in the package name

2010-08-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org writes: And if there are any prospects of upstream cleaning up their tree, the ~ symbol makes it possible to re-release the same tarball without the offending files. Yes, either ~ or + will work provided that you haven't just realized that upstream has files

Re: RFS: glogg (third try, new version)

2010-08-18 Thread Varun Hiremath
Hi Nicolas, On Tue, 17 Aug, 2010 at 11:21:32AM +0100, Nicolas Bonnefon wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package glogg. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. I would upload the package if you fixed the following (minor) issues: 1/ lintian W: glogg