Doubts in Sigar packaging

2010-09-14 Thread Thiago Franco de Moraes
Hi all, I'm trying again to package a library called SIGAR [1] because it's a requirement in a free software help to develop called InVesalius [2]. During this trying some doubts occurred: * The Source is in git [3]. I'm not using the last stable version because I wasn't able to compile it.

RFS: matrixssl

2010-09-14 Thread zeus
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package matrixssl. * Package name: matrixssl Version : 3.1.2-2 Upstream Author : PeerSec Networks, Inc. supp...@peersec.com * URL : http://www.matrixssl.org/ * License : GPL Section : libs It builds

Re: Doubts in Sigar packaging

2010-09-14 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:51:22PM -0300, Thiago Franco de Moraes wrote: I'm trying again to package a library called SIGAR [1] because it's a requirement in a free software help to develop called InVesalius [2]. During this trying some doubts occurred: * The Source is in git [3]. I'm not

reprepro signing.

2010-09-14 Thread Ignacio Valdes
Hi all, I am trying to get repository signing going with reprepro. I have my key built with gpg, Signwith set to yes, Release.gpg gets generated. When I try to test it with apt-get update I receive: W: GPG error: http://software.astronautvista.com karmic Release: The following signatures couldn't

Re: reprepro signing.

2010-09-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Ignacio Valdes ival...@hal-pc.org writes: Hi all, I am trying to get repository signing going with reprepro. I have my key built with gpg, Signwith set to yes, Release.gpg gets generated. When I try to test it with apt-get update I receive: W: GPG error: http://software.astronautvista.com