On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
I want to realize the idea of a debian directory usable for Debian *and*
Ubuntu. It works with a switch in the clean target of debian/rules:
Great!
ifeq ($(shell dpkg-vendor --is Ubuntu echo yes),yes)
@echo modify changelog and control file
On 01/18/2011 03:13 PM, harish badrinath wrote:
Given that i was told that you can deterministically determine which
file would run first DEBIAN/control _or_ DEBIAN/preinst, I have this
following query.
I want to source a common file between these two scripts to ensure
that if the package
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 01/18/2011 03:13 PM, harish badrinath wrote:
Given that i was told that you can deterministically determine which
file would run first DEBIAN/control _or_ DEBIAN/preinst, I have this
following query.
Sorry i was told
harish badrinath, 2011-01-18 13:00:03 +0530 :
I want to source a common file between these two scripts
You can't be sure that the common file is present on the system when
config runs (since that may be before the package is unpacked). You
can, however, maintain the common part as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-17 22:04, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, Niels,
Hey
I have uploaded a new version of rman. Could you not, please, have a look?
It seems, that I have fixed all issues, which were suggested by you.
Sure; I have a question to the realloc
Hi, Niels,
I have re-uploaded that.
Thanks.
Anton
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-17 22:04, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, Niels,
Hey
I have uploaded a new version of rman. Could you not,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
[Arvind, I hope you don't mind if I publish quotes from your private
mail to the public list. I do not really consider the information very
private and it is important to share the information. Otherwise you will
not
Hello,
What should preferably be used for packaging-the sources from sourceforge
and the stable bazaar branch maintained at launchpad?
--
Arvind S Raj
Szanowni Państwo,
W związku z ustawą z dnia 18 lipca 2002 roku o świadczeniu usług drogą
elektroniczną (dz.U.nr144 z 9 września 2002 r.,poz1204), prosimy o wyrażenie
zgody na przesłanie drogą elektroniczną oferty dotyczącej:
DYSTRYBUCJI KRAJOWYCH I ZAGRANICZNYCH PRZESYŁEK KURIERSKICH
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 06:35:42PM +0530, Arvind S Raj wrote:
Their development happens in launchpad but they release new source packages
in sourceforge-at least the new version was released there. *Also, a new
version was released-2.0. It's no longer in beta. So, I will be packaging
that
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 06:43:28PM +0530, Arvind S Raj wrote:
What should preferably be used for packaging-the sources from sourceforge
and the stable bazaar branch maintained at launchpad?
You should not maintain the source but just provide some patches for the
simply downloaded released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-18 12:15, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, Niels,
I have re-uploaded that.
Thanks.
Anton
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
On 2011-01-17 22:04, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, Niels,
Hey
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-16 02:16, Fernando Mercês wrote:
Niels,
You're right in all points. Thank you for help. I've used the new tool
for DEP-5 and got no warnings. I've fixed the other issues too.
Please, can you check the package now (already
Ups, sorry.
Uploaded.
Anton
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-18 12:15, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, Niels,
I have re-uploaded that.
Thanks.
Anton
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:44 AM,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:20:29PM -0500, Scott Howard wrote:
Hello- non-DD review. I haven't built it yet but there are some quick
cosmetic things to do first:
Thanks so much for the feedback! I'll look into doing these next time
I get some spare brain cycles.
Standards-Version: 3.8.4
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote on 2011-01-18 09:03:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Now my questions:
1. is this a good way for switching contol file?
It must switch the maintainer lines because Ubuntu has another policy.
No. Ubuntu doesn't change
Hi, all!
I have received a valuable advices and suggestions from some
debian-developers (Ansgar Burchardt, Niels Thykier, Jakub Wilk and
others), working on other packages. So I need to modify yade-0.60 to
make it lintian clean completely.
After work is finished, I will reupload yade-0.60.
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Ok, but how should I manage the last changelog entry (in time frame and
in handling)?
Debian should have e.g:
lilo (1:23.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
and then Ubuntu should have e.g:
lilo (1:23.1-1ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low
lilo
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Ok, but how should I manage the last changelog entry (in time frame and
in handling)?
Debian should have e.g:
lilo (1:23.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
and then Ubuntu
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:12 PM,
travis+ml-debian-ment...@subspacefield.org wrote:
Standards-Version: 3.8.4 should be 3.9.1
I used the dh tools to make this, and I've seen debuild complain
about this, but really didn't know what I should be doing in this
case - funny thing is, both tools were
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote:
TOR not having their act together - does that mean that they haven't
released a stable version yet or that no stable package is in Debian?
Would you be interested in packaging and maintaining TOR in Debian?
Sorry, just
Hi,
I was wondering, why DEHS claims ncbi-tools6 as not 'uptodate' but rather
'error'.
The DEHS page[1] says for experimental
# Watch: view (comments below)
Too bad uscan doesn't actually honor downloadurlmangle for FTP urls. :-/
[would use downloadurlmangle=s|$|/ncbi.tar.gz|]
# Uscan
I've filed a bug against vte upstream which you may want to subscribe
to. I don't know if they'll take much notice, because the affected vte
function is deprecated and I think its replacement is OK, but somebody
there might know what's going on.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639900
Dies schrieb Nick Leverton (n...@leverton.org):
Every .c-file has to contain that header? Sure, possible, but seems very
awkward?
It helps, the Debian tool licensecheck can then scan and report on the
contents of the package. Also if a source is borrowed elsewhere, the
authorship is
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20110118-1
of my package mobile-broadband-provider-info.
It builds these binary packages:
mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband service providers
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can
25 matches
Mail list logo
