Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

2011-03-02 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:03:33 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:15:17AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > Note that I should soon be a DM, so if you do sponsor my package and deem > > it appropriate, I'd appreciate a DMUA field. (This is my third NMU of this > > package; I'll glad

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

2011-03-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Hi, first of all I've uploaded the package. Thanks for fixing it once again. I didn't test the evolution part so I hope that works as well. (flame me later if it breaks ...) > As far as I'm aware LUI Qi is MIA (mia have been notified)

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

2011-03-02 Thread LIU Qi
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:42:06AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > Hi, Hi Sven, > first of all I've uploaded the package. Thanks for fixing it once again. > I didn't test the evolution part so I hope that works as well. (flame me

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

2011-03-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:51:55PM +0800, LIU Qi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:42:06AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > Please follow up with mia@ to check the current state of the process. > > I didn't add the DMUA+Uploader flag because that should definitely not > happen > > in a NM

Re: Struggling to remove old config files.

2011-03-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Michael Lustfield wrote: > I know the correct way to remove these files is with dpkg-maintscript-helper. > I > tried my hardest to use this correctly. I had a few incorrect uses pointed out > to me that have since been corrected. However, I am still unable to remove > these in

Re: Struggling to remove old config files.

2011-03-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Please keep the discussion on debian-mentors. On Wed, 02 Mar 2011, Michael Lustfield wrote: > The reason I put it in nginx-common was because nginx-{full,light,extras} are > interchangeable packages. Someone could remove one and add another. An example > would be the upgrade made them install ngin

Re: RFS: ulatencyd - Daemon to minimize latency on a linux system using cgroups (2nd try)

2011-03-02 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ulatencyd". Hi Alessandro, here is my (promised) review, with some delay; please forgive me for that; life took over… > ulatencyd - Daemon to minimize latency on a linux system using cgroups > > The

Re: Struggling to remove old config files.

2011-03-02 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:18:56 +0100 Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Please keep the discussion on debian-mentors. Sorry, I didn't take notice of the email being replied to. > And? Purging a package removes the configuration files. So that's ok. I would like that but it's more likely to remove the packa

Looking for a sponsor/ package review : Bug#616126: ITP: authprogs -- A simple wrapper for SSH's resticted commands via pubkey auth

2011-03-02 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
Hello , I found this simple script quite useful . Would be nice if someone also would check it for the input sanitization and security concerns , for me it looks ok . debian directory available in the svn repository : https://elite.bshellz.net/svn/rsvn/authprogs/trunk/ or here : http://www.bi

nested ifeq in debian/rules (makefile)

2011-03-02 Thread Richard Ulrich
Hi, I'm new to debian mentors. A while ago I read a blog article about how to use only one branch for debian and ubuntu packages with different dependencies. http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/09/27/different-dependencies-between-debian-and-ubuntu-but-common-source-package/ I tried to implement it,

Re: nested ifeq in debian/rules (makefile)

2011-03-02 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Richard Ulrich , 2011-03-02, 22:13: ifeq ( $(shell [ -e /etc/dpkg/origins/default ]; printf $$?), 0) ifeq ( $(shell dpkg-vendor --derives-from Ubuntu && echo yes), yes) Remove spaces between "(" and "$". -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Re: nested ifeq in debian/rules (makefile)

2011-03-02 Thread Richard Ulrich
Hi Jakub, I played around with the spaces a lot. The result was always the same. ifeq ($(shell[-e /etc/dpkg/origins/default];printf $$?),0) ifeq ($(shell dpkg-vendor --derives-from Ubuntu && echo yes),yes) Rgds Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Re: nested ifeq in debian/rules (makefile)

2011-03-02 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Richard Ulrich , 2011-03-03, 00:29: ifeq ($(shell[-e /etc/dpkg/origins/default];printf $$?),0) How could this possibly work? $ [-e /etc/dpkg/origins/default];printf $? bash: [-e: command not found 127 I didn't tell you to remove space from every place you can think of, but only two particu

Re: nested ifeq in debian/rules (makefile)

2011-03-02 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Richard Ulrich wrote on 2011-03-02 22:13: > ifeq ( $(shell [ -e /etc/dpkg/origins/default ]; printf $$?), 0) > ifeq ( $(shell dpkg-vendor --derives-from Ubuntu && echo yes), yes) > @echo "ubuntu maverick" > else > @echo "debian squeeze" > endif > else >